Feinstein introduces Senate Gun Ban: 205 models to be banned, mags over 10 rnds.

[Anti Federalist]

Dianne Feinstein Introduces Ban on 205 Different ‘Assault Weapons’

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...roduces-ban-on-205-different-assault-weapons/

AWR Hawkins 12 Mar 2021

Following Thursday’s House passage of a Democrat gun control bill, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) introduced a ban on 205 “assault weapons.”

The legislation, called the “Assault Weapons Ban of 2021,” is co-sponsored by 34 Senate Democrats. It would also ban ammunition magazines holding more than ten rounds.

Feinstein’s ban would allow current owners of “assault weapons” to retain possession of them, but if the gun is transferred, a person must undergo an FBI background check before receiving the firearm.

Her “Assault Weapons Ban” also bans bump stocks, which have been illegal since March 26, 2019.

Feinstein announced her ban stating:

It’s been 17 years since the original Assault Weapons Ban expired, and the plague of gun violence continues to grow in this country. To be clear, this bill saves lives. When it was in place from 1994-2004, gun massacres declined by 37 percent compared with the decade before. After the ban expired, the number of massacres rose by 183 percent.

In contrast, the Department of Justice’s National Institute of Justice (NIJ) issued a report indicating the 1994 “assault weapons” ban did not reduce crime.

The Washington Times quoted University of Pennsylvania professor Christopher Koper, author of the NIJ report, saying, “We cannot clearly credit the ban with any of the nation’s recent drop in gun violence. And, indeed, there has been no discernible reduction in the lethality and injuriousness of gun violence.”

The NIJ report continued, “The ban’s effects on gun violence are likely to be small at best and perhaps too small for reliable measurement.”

 

[Anti Federalist]

A BILL

https://www.feinstein.senate.gov/pu...DFC5F9841B0C4.assault-weapons-ban-of-2021.pdf

To regulate assault weapons, to ensure that the right to keep and bear arms is not unlimited,

( the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. - AF)

...


6 ALB21406 F2PS.L.C.‘‘(III) Alexander Arms Overmatch1Plus 16.2‘‘(IV) Armalite M15 22LR Carbine.3‘‘(V) Armalite M15–T.4‘‘(VI) Barrett REC7.5‘‘(VII) Beretta AR–70.6‘‘(VIII) Black Rain Ordnance Recon7Scout.8‘‘(IX) Bushmaster ACR.9‘‘(X) Bushmaster Carbon 15.10‘‘(XI) Bushmaster MOE series.11‘‘(XII) Bushmaster XM15.12‘‘(XIII) Chiappa Firearms MFour ri-13fles.14‘‘(XIV) Colt Match Target rifles.15‘‘(XV) CORE Rifle Systems CORE1516rifles.17‘‘(XVI) Daniel Defense M4A1 rifles.18‘‘(XVII) Devil Dog Arms 15 Series ri-19fles.20‘‘(XVIII) Diamondback DB15 rifles.21‘‘(XIX) DoubleStar AR rifles.22‘‘(XX) DPMS Tactical rifles.23‘‘(XXI) DSA Inc. ZM–4 Carbine.24‘‘(XXII) Heckler & Koch MR556.25
7 ALB21406 F2PS.L.C.‘‘(XXIII) High Standard HSA–15 ri-1fles.2‘‘(XXIV) Jesse James Nomad AR–153rifle.4‘‘(XXV) Knight’s Armament SR–15.5‘‘(XXVI) Lancer L15 rifles.6‘‘(XXVII) MGI Hydra Series rifles.7‘‘(XXVIII) Mossberg MMR Tactical8rifles.9‘‘(XXIX) Noreen Firearms BN 3610rifle.11‘‘(XXX) Olympic Arms.12‘‘(XXXI) POF USA P415.13‘‘(XXXII) Precision Firearms AR ri-14fles.15‘‘(XXXIII) Remington R–15 rifles.16‘‘(XXXIV) Rhino Arms AR rifles.17‘‘(XXXV) Rock River Arms LAR–15.18‘‘(XXXVI) Sig Sauer SIG516 rifles19and MCX rifles.20‘‘(XXXVII) Smith & Wesson M&P1521rifles.22‘‘(XXXVIII) Stag Arms AR rifles.23‘‘(XXXIX) Sturm, Ruger & Co.24SR556 and AR–556 rifles.25
8 ALB21406 F2PS.L.C.‘‘(XL) Uselton Arms Air-Lite M–4 ri-1fles.2‘‘(XLI) Windham Weaponry AR ri-3fles.4‘‘(XLII) WMD Guns Big Beast.5‘‘(XLIII) Yankee Hill Machine Com-6pany, Inc. YHM–15 rifles.7‘‘(iii) Barrett M107A1.8‘‘(iv) Barrett M82A1.9‘‘(v) Beretta CX4 Storm.10‘‘(vi) Calico Liberty Series.11‘‘(vii) CETME Sporter.12‘‘(viii) Daewoo K–1, K–2, Max 1, Max 2,13AR 100, and AR 110C.14‘‘(ix) Fabrique Nationale/FN Herstal15FAL, LAR, 22 FNC, 308 Match, L1A116Sporter, PS90, SCAR, and FS2000.17‘‘(x) Feather Industries AT–9.18‘‘(xi) Galil Model AR and Model ARM.19‘‘(xii) Hi-Point Carbine.20‘‘(xiii) HK–91, HK–93, HK–94, HK–21PSG–1, and HK USC.22‘‘(xiv) IWI TAVOR, Galil ACE rifle.23‘‘(xv) Kel-Tec Sub-2000, SU–16, and24RFB.25
9 ALB21406 F2PS.L.C.‘‘(xvi) SIG AMT, SIG PE–57, Sig Sauer1SG 550, Sig Sauer SG 551, and SIG MCX.2‘‘(xvii) Springfield Armory SAR–48.3‘‘(xviii) Steyr AUG.4‘‘(xix) Sturm, Ruger & Co. Mini-14 Tac-5tical Rifle M–14/20CF.6‘‘(xx) All Thompson rifles, including the7following:8‘‘(I) Thompson M1SB.9‘‘(II) Thompson T1100D.10‘‘(III) Thompson T150D.11‘‘(IV) Thompson T1B.12‘‘(V) Thompson T1B100D.13‘‘(VI) Thompson T1B50D.14‘‘(VII) Thompson T1BSB.15‘‘(VIII) Thompson T1–C.16‘‘(IX) Thompson T1D.17‘‘(X) Thompson T1SB.18‘‘(XI) Thompson T5.19‘‘(XII) Thompson T5100D.20‘‘(XIII) Thompson TM1.21‘‘(XIV) Thompson TM1C.22‘‘(xxi) UMAREX UZI rifle.23‘‘(xxii) UZI Mini Carbine, UZI Model A24Carbine, and UZI Model B Carbine.25
10ALB21406 F2PS.L.C.‘‘(xxiii) Valmet M62S, M71S, and M78.1‘‘(xxiv) Vector Arms UZI Type.2‘‘(xxv) Weaver Arms Nighthawk.3‘‘(xxvi) Wilkinson Arms Linda Carbine.4‘‘(I) All of the following pistols, copies, dupli-5cates, variants, or altered facsimiles with the capa-6bility of any such weapon thereof:7‘‘(i) All AK types, including the following:8‘‘(I) Centurion 39 AK pistol.9‘‘(II) CZ Scorpion pistol.10‘‘(III) Draco AK–47 pistol.11‘‘(IV) HCR AK–47 pistol.12‘‘(V) IO Inc. Hellpup AK–47 pistol.13‘‘(VI) Krinkov pistol.14‘‘(VII) Mini Draco AK–47 pistol.15‘‘(VIII) PAP M92 pistol.16‘‘(IX) Yugo Krebs Krink pistol.17‘‘(ii) All AR types, including the following:18‘‘(I) American Spirit AR–15 pistol.19‘‘(II) Bushmaster Carbon 15 pistol.20‘‘(III) Chiappa Firearms M4 Pistol21GEN II.22‘‘(IV) CORE Rifle Systems CORE1523Roscoe pistol.24‘‘(V) Daniel Defense MK18 pistol.25
11ALB21406 F2PS.L.C.‘‘(VI) DoubleStar Corporation AR pis-1tol.2‘‘(VII) DPMS AR–15 pistol.3‘‘(VIII) Jesse James Nomad AR–154pistol.5‘‘(IX) Olympic Arms AR–15 pistol.6‘‘(X) Osprey Armament MK–18 pis-7tol.8‘‘(XI) POF USA AR pistols.9‘‘(XII) Rock River Arms LAR 15 pis-10tol.11‘‘(XIII) Uselton Arms Air-Lite M–412pistol.13‘‘(iii) Calico pistols.14‘‘(iv) DSA SA58 PKP FAL pistol.15‘‘(v) Encom MP–9 and MP–45.16‘‘(vi) Heckler & Koch model SP–89 pistol.17‘‘(vii) Intratec AB–10, TEC–22 Scorpion,18TEC–9, and TEC–DC9.19‘‘(viii) IWI Galil Ace pistol, UZI PRO pis-20tol.21‘‘(ix) Kel-Tec PLR 16 pistol.22‘‘(x) All MAC types, including the fol-23lowing:24‘‘(I) MAC–10.25
12ALB21406 F2PS.L.C.‘‘(II) MAC–11.1‘‘(III) Masterpiece Arms MPA A9302Mini Pistol, MPA460 Pistol, MPA Tactical3Pistol, and MPA Mini Tactical Pistol.4‘‘(IV) Military Armament Corp.5Ingram M–11.6‘‘(V) Velocity Arms VMAC.7‘‘(xi) Sig Sauer P556 pistol.8‘‘(xii) Sites Spectre.9‘‘(xiii) All Thompson types, including the10following:11‘‘(I) Thompson TA510D.12‘‘(II) Thompson TA5.13‘‘(xiv) All UZI types, including Micro-UZI.14‘‘(J) All of the following shotguns, copies, dupli-15cates, variants, or altered facsimiles with the capa-16bility of any such weapon thereof:17‘‘(i) DERYA Anakon MC–1980, Anakon18SD12.19‘‘(ii) Doruk Lethal shotguns.20‘‘(iii) Franchi LAW–12 and SPAS 12.21‘‘(iv) All IZHMASH Saiga 12 types, in-22cluding the following:23‘‘(I) IZHMASH Saiga 12.24‘‘(II) IZHMASH Saiga 12S.25
13ALB21406 F2PS.L.C.‘‘(III) IZHMASH Saiga 12S EXP–101.2‘‘(IV) IZHMASH Saiga 12K.3‘‘(V) IZHMASH Saiga 12K–030.4‘‘(VI) IZHMASH Saiga 12K–0405Taktika.6‘‘(v) Streetsweeper.7‘‘(vi) Striker 12.8‘‘(K) All belt-fed semiautomatic firearms, in-9cluding TNW M2HB and FN M2495.10‘‘

 

[Anti Globalist]

Feinstein needs to fucking retire already.

 

[Joe McCarthy]

Well, let's see.

The average magazine swap time for a non-expert shooter is 2-3 seconds. In the case of the Newtown Sandy Hook massacre, the murderer performed 10 magazine changes, or about 30 of the ~600 seconds that lapsed from him entering the building to when the police arrived. A 10-round restriction would have raised it to only 46 seconds and thus would have saved nobody.

As far as the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban goes: Murder rates were 19.3% higher when the Federal assault weapons ban was in force. Also, the ban covered only 1.39% of the models of firearms on the market, so the ban’s effectiveness is automatically limited.

And of course, the most important point: Shall NOT be infringed!

 

[oyarde]

Fucking commies everywhere .

 

[pcosmar]

$#@!ing commies everywhere .

But it is exactly why Kalashnikov designed a simple rifle,,that could be built anywhere.

that concept could benefit from new minds,, and inspiration.

 

[Occam's Banana]

3D printer go brrr

 

[TheCount]

It's fine because rubber bands exist

 

[TheCount]

The sub2000 is an AR rifle?


The list is completely nutty.

 

[ClaytonB]

Her “Assault Weapons Ban” also bans bump stocks, which have been illegal since March 26, 2019. useless since they were invented...

FTFT (Fixed That For Them)...

 

[TheTexan]

A lot of those are legitimately useful hunting rifles (hog hunting etc) and are thus protected under the 2nd amendment

 

[69360]

They can introduce all the bills they want. They won't get 60 votes.

 

[Joe McCarthy]

They can introduce all the bills they want. They won't get 60 votes.

Yeah, that is true. And that is why they have said they will pass it and other Bills by ending the filibuster or somehow sidestepping it using some technicalities.

 

[pcosmar]

A lot of those are legitimately useful hunting rifles (hog hunting etc) and are thus protected under the 2nd amendment

Hog Hunting=legitimate.

Noted.

 

[TheTexan]

Hog Hunting=legitimate.

Noted.

Some hog hunts, are more dangerous than others .

 

[oyarde]

A lot of those are legitimately useful hunting rifles (hog hunting etc) and are thus protected under the 2nd amendment

and goose hunting saiga 12

 

[pcosmar]

Some hog hunts, are more dangerous than others .

Understood.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Yeah, that is true. And that is why they have said they will pass it and other Bills by ending the filibuster or somehow sidestepping it using some technicalities.

Bingo...

It will "reconcile" with HR127 for instance:


HR127: It’s Your Money or Your Guns

https://www.rallyforourrights.com/hr127-your-money-or-your-guns/

Posted on February 4, 2021 by Mario Acevedo

HR127: It’s Your Money or Your Guns

HR 127 has been called “The Gun Apocalypse” and for good reason. Introduced by Congresswoman Sheila Jackson D-TX, this bill is formally known as the Sabika Sheikh Firearm Licensing and Registration Act. What HR127 ultimately does is wipe out the Second Amendment by making gun ownership unaffordable for all but the most affluent. Which is clearly the intent.

It’s ironic that the Democrats who preach criminal justice reform aren’t hesitating, with the stroke of a pen, to turn millions of law-abiding Americans into felons, punishing them with onerous fines and years of incarceration. Despite this, nothing in HR127 will disarm one violent criminal or reduce the gun homicide rampaging through our cities.

There is much about this bill that makes it unworkable and impractical but for the moment, I’ll focus the discussion on what it will cost your wallet.

Pony up, Mr. Gun Owner

This bill requires that every applicant for a gun license must first pay $800 to the US Attorney General for liability insurance. Never mind that as a gun owner, if you have homeowner’s or renter’s insurance, you already have gun accident insurance under the plan’s liability umbrella coverage. This requirement begs many questions such as, what experience does the AG have in managing insurance? How will claims be processed? Does this insurance protect a gun owner against law suits? Does this insurance cover legal expenses? There remain more questions and I’ll turn back to those later.

You’ll also be required to take 24 hours of training to include live firing training. Maybe you can find such training at $50 per hour so you’re talking $1200, minimum.

You want a gun? You must be crazy!

HR127 requires that every gun owner and member of the household undergo an evaluation by a licensed psychologist. Plus, this psychologist must interview any former spouses as well as at least two other family members or associates. Since the standards for these required evaluations are as yet not available, it’s difficult to determine how much they will cost but a reasonable estimate is $1000 each. Assuming three in your household, that’s at least $3000. Add another $1000 for the interviews—another estimate—and we’re talking $4000.

Also consider that HR127 mentions that these licensed psychologists must be approved by the AG. An Internet search shows about 100K licensed psychologists in the country and not every of them will be approved. Consider the evaluations required of gun owners and members of their households plus interviews with the ex’s and associates, that means less than 100K psychologists will be conducting hundreds of millions of evaluations and interviews. By what deadline? Those psychologists already have full schedules so we’re expecting them to take on such an avalanche of new clients on top of that? This situation will create a seller’s market of insane proportions. With that in mind, who knows what you’ll pay for a shrink’s time.

Speaking of pay…who will pay for these evaluations and interviews?

Not the AG, but you.

The psychological evaluation is offered with the premise it will be an accurate predictor of who should or shouldn’t have a gun. But in truth, those giving such evals, highly trained psychologists and psychiatrists, have a miserable record at protecting public safety. The shooters at Thousand Oaks, the Aurora Theater, and the Parkland high school had all been extensively evaluated for exhibiting dangerous behavior prior to the shootings, and yet nothing was done to prevent the ensuing massacres. And sadly, the increasing rate of suicides in this country shows that mental health professionals don’t have a firm grasp at preventing fatal self-harm.

If there is a hint that the AG’s licensed psychologists may bear any liability for a misdiagnosis, then expect the Catch 22 of HR127 to kick in:

We must keep the mentally disturbed from getting a gun

….and only the mentally disturbed would want a gun.

HR127: By the Number$$

How much will HR127 cost you, the law-abiding gun owner, to keep your property? Factor in fees (also unspecified) for the registration of each gun (don’t forget ammo), the permit application, and the permit itself so a lowball estimate for the first gun is:

Insurance: $800
Training: $1200
Psyche eval: $4000
Fees: ???

Total: $6000+

The AG’s Money Grab

Let’s return to the insurance. Assuming 75 million gun owners in this country, let’s say 25 million won’t pay this extortion and thus give up their guns. That means 50 million will jump through the financial hoops. The simple math of 50 million gun owners times $800 each means $40 billion of your money will slosh into the coffers of the AG. That’s a lot of cash. Substantially more than the entire 2020 budget for the US Department of Justice ($29.9B). What happens to all that money? Does it remain in an insurance portfolio…managed by whom? Or does that money get lost in a slush fund?

Currently, every state in the union is experiencing an alarming surge in gun homicide, mostly because of gang and drug-related shootings aggravated by the pandemic lockdowns. Is anyone naive enough to think that any criminal will subject themselves to the provisions of this bill considering they’re not supposed to have guns to begin with? Tragically, HR127 will do nothing to protect anyone from violent crime or make our streets any safer.

 

[Joe McCarthy]

Bingo...

It will "reconcile" with HR127 for instance:


HR127: It’s Your Money or Your Guns

https://www.rallyforourrights.com/hr127-your-money-or-your-guns/

Posted on February 4, 2021 by Mario Acevedo

HR127: It’s Your Money or Your Guns

HR 127 has been called “The Gun Apocalypse” and for good reason. Introduced by Congresswoman Sheila Jackson D-TX, this bill is formally known as the Sabika Sheikh Firearm Licensing and Registration Act. What HR127 ultimately does is wipe out the Second Amendment by making gun ownership unaffordable for all but the most affluent. Which is clearly the intent.

It’s ironic that the Democrats who preach criminal justice reform aren’t hesitating, with the stroke of a pen, to turn millions of law-abiding Americans into felons, punishing them with onerous fines and years of incarceration. Despite this, nothing in HR127 will disarm one violent criminal or reduce the gun homicide rampaging through our cities.

There is much about this bill that makes it unworkable and impractical but for the moment, I’ll focus the discussion on what it will cost your wallet.

Pony up, Mr. Gun Owner

This bill requires that every applicant for a gun license must first pay $800 to the US Attorney General for liability insurance. Never mind that as a gun owner, if you have homeowner’s or renter’s insurance, you already have gun accident insurance under the plan’s liability umbrella coverage. This requirement begs many questions such as, what experience does the AG have in managing insurance? How will claims be processed? Does this insurance protect a gun owner against law suits? Does this insurance cover legal expenses? There remain more questions and I’ll turn back to those later.

You’ll also be required to take 24 hours of training to include live firing training. Maybe you can find such training at $50 per hour so you’re talking $1200, minimum.

You want a gun? You must be crazy!

HR127 requires that every gun owner and member of the household undergo an evaluation by a licensed psychologist. Plus, this psychologist must interview any former spouses as well as at least two other family members or associates. Since the standards for these required evaluations are as yet not available, it’s difficult to determine how much they will cost but a reasonable estimate is $1000 each. Assuming three in your household, that’s at least $3000. Add another $1000 for the interviews—another estimate—and we’re talking $4000.

Also consider that HR127 mentions that these licensed psychologists must be approved by the AG. An Internet search shows about 100K licensed psychologists in the country and not every of them will be approved. Consider the evaluations required of gun owners and members of their households plus interviews with the ex’s and associates, that means less than 100K psychologists will be conducting hundreds of millions of evaluations and interviews. By what deadline? Those psychologists already have full schedules so we’re expecting them to take on such an avalanche of new clients on top of that? This situation will create a seller’s market of insane proportions. With that in mind, who knows what you’ll pay for a shrink’s time.

Speaking of pay…who will pay for these evaluations and interviews?

Not the AG, but you.

The psychological evaluation is offered with the premise it will be an accurate predictor of who should or shouldn’t have a gun. But in truth, those giving such evals, highly trained psychologists and psychiatrists, have a miserable record at protecting public safety. The shooters at Thousand Oaks, the Aurora Theater, and the Parkland high school had all been extensively evaluated for exhibiting dangerous behavior prior to the shootings, and yet nothing was done to prevent the ensuing massacres. And sadly, the increasing rate of suicides in this country shows that mental health professionals don’t have a firm grasp at preventing fatal self-harm.

If there is a hint that the AG’s licensed psychologists may bear any liability for a misdiagnosis, then expect the Catch 22 of HR127 to kick in:

We must keep the mentally disturbed from getting a gun

….and only the mentally disturbed would want a gun.

HR127: By the Number$$

How much will HR127 cost you, the law-abiding gun owner, to keep your property? Factor in fees (also unspecified) for the registration of each gun (don’t forget ammo), the permit application, and the permit itself so a lowball estimate for the first gun is:

Insurance: $800
Training: $1200
Psyche eval: $4000
Fees: ???

Total: $6000+

The AG’s Money Grab

Let’s return to the insurance. Assuming 75 million gun owners in this country, let’s say 25 million won’t pay this extortion and thus give up their guns. That means 50 million will jump through the financial hoops. The simple math of 50 million gun owners times $800 each means $40 billion of your money will slosh into the coffers of the AG. That’s a lot of cash. Substantially more than the entire 2020 budget for the US Department of Justice ($29.9B). What happens to all that money? Does it remain in an insurance portfolio…managed by whom? Or does that money get lost in a slush fund?

Currently, every state in the union is experiencing an alarming surge in gun homicide, mostly because of gang and drug-related shootings aggravated by the pandemic lockdowns. Is anyone naive enough to think that any criminal will subject themselves to the provisions of this bill considering they’re not supposed to have guns to begin with? Tragically, HR127 will do nothing to protect anyone from violent crime or make our streets any safer.

You hit the nail on the head. HR 8 is a walk in the park compared to HR 127. What I disagree with is the parts you consider to be the most dangerous. Now, the liability insurance and the psych evaluation is highly problematic, no arguments there. But the most objectionable parts of the this bill comes further ahead:

The law, HR 127, if passed and signed into law would, under §932 establish licensing of firearms and ammunition, as well as registration of firearms. This section would require the owner of a firearm to transmit to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, under section (b)(1):

(A) the make, model, and serial number of the firearm, the identity of the owner of the firearm, the date the firearm was acquired by the owner, and where the firearm is or will be stored; and

(B) a notice specifying the identity of any person to whom, and any period of time during which, the firearm will be loaned to the person.

The above information would be required within three months of the effective date of the bill for firearms already owned by that date, and on the date an owner acquires a firearm for any weapons acquired after the effective date.

Here’s the kicker about the above section. Read this carefully:

“The Attorney General shall make the contents of the database accessible to all members of the public [emphasis added], all Federal, State and local law enforcement authorities, all branches of the United States Armed Forces [emphasis added], and all State and local governments, as defined by the Bureau.”

So think about this for a minute. This law would publicize who owns guns, and where they store them. What a windfall for potential criminals…the ability to know who keeps guns in their homes (and by extension who does NOT) and where the guns are stored.

This is like putting a scarlet letter out there for where criminals can acquire guns. Or, where they don’t need to be worried about encountering an armed homeowner.

Secondly, why would the military need to know who has arms? For what purpose? The 2nd Amendment was included in the Bill of Rights in part to protect the people from a tyrannical government.

If there is anything we have seen with the current makeup of Congress and the current administration, it is that they do not seem to be shy about imposing tyrannical standards or rules upon the American people.

 

[PAF]

When enough Americans gun-toters stop worrying about bills and stop asking for permission please, perhaps the natural right [outlined in the 2nd Amendment] will mean something other than this-side that-side.