Feds warn Texas not to enforce state-level immigration bill

Occam's Banana said:
https://twitter.com/kylenabecker/status/1750376456713031747
to: https://twitter.com/kylenabecker/status/1750397007384977486
M94DpYM.png


Montana:

https://twitter.com/GovGianforte/status/1749958694966640717
hIsIB97.png


Utah:

https://twitter.com/GovCox/status/1750380041312297360
elLM3oT.png
Click to expand...

Moral support is all well and good - and a very good start - but every state offering it needs to back that up with sending whatever assistance/NG/personnel they can.
 
Brian4Liberty said:
Is this all political theater?

https://twitter.com/RandyClarkBBTX/status/1750198199434813863
Click to expand...

It's certainly worth noting and everyone concerned about this issue has wondered what Abbott's deal is. Is Abbott just another RINO, weak, a globalist or were their other considerations? We don't know until we hear it from him. I do recal, however, previous rumblings of a showdown and the feds threatening to suspend flights to Texas so there's a lot those demons could do to cause more serious problems. That goes to that tweet I posted about Abbott so carefully worded his letter which is a big deal. He needs the support of other states. I'm also reminded of this when the question is posed, "What took so long?":

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient Causes; and accordingly all Experience hath shewn, that Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while Evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the Forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future Security. Such has been the patient Sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the Necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.
 
Anti Federalist said:
Hmmm...that's disappointing.

I should think orgs like that would be whole heartedly supporting this.

Unless they have just been part of Conservative Inc. all along.
Click to expand...

IIRC, The Tenth Amendment Center is one guy blogging from his apartment or house. At least that's how it started, and I see no evidence that it is any more than that now.
 
susano said:
It's certainly worth noting and everyone concerned about this issue has wondered what Abbott's deal is. Is Abbott just another RINO, weak, a globalist or were their other considerations? We don't know until we hear it from him. I do recal, however, previous rumblings of a showdown and the feds threatening to suspend flights to Texas so there's a lot those demons could do to cause more serious problems. That goes to that tweet I posted about Abbott so carefully worded his letter which is a big deal. He needs the support of other states. I'm also reminded of this when the question is posed, "What took so long?":

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient Causes; and accordingly all Experience hath shewn, that Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while Evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the Forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future Security. Such has been the patient Sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the Necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.
Click to expand...

If we were to assume that Abbott is under the control, either directly or indirectly, of the real globalist powers that be, then what is currently happening would be with their approval.

Clearly, the globalist agenda has been to destroy every major nation, via war, and in this case, immigration, starting with Europe and now the United States. The massive, rapid immigration serves to break down the national identities and culture, but that is still a tactic for a further end of breaking down the nations entirely.

In other words, massive, rapid immigration is just the means to create the civil war and break apart a nation.

In that light, what part of this is in opposition to that agenda?

What would Smedley Butler think?
 
Last edited:
Brian4Liberty said:
If we were to assume that Abbott is under the control, either directly or indirectly, of the real globalist powers that be, then what is currently happening would be with their approval.

Clearly, the globalist agenda has been to destroy every major nation, via war, and in this case, immigration, starting with Europe and now the United States. The massive, rapid immigration serves to break down the national identities and culture, but that is still a tactic for a further end of breaking down the nations entirely.

In other words, massive, rapid immigration is just the means to create the civil war and break apart a nation.

In that light, what part of this is in opposition to that agenda?

What would Smedley Butler think?
Click to expand...

I see those comments elsewhere, as well. Balkanization, the UN or Agenda 2021/30 plan of breaking the US into ten districts, etc. The thing is, what to do? If someone is punching you in the face to provoke a fight, do you just let them do it because you know that's their plan or do you fight back regardless of knowing you've been manipulated? If you don't fight back, you get destroyed. If do fight back you, at least, have a chance to make your own plan in the new set of circumstances which are beyond your control.
 
Add Kansas, Missouri, Alberta, Kentucky and Tennessee, none of which are unlikely, and it really shapes up. Divides Canada in twain and the U. S. in thrain.
 
Brian4Liberty said:
What would Smedley Butler think?
Click to expand...

He would say:

There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights.

Our homes and our Bill of Rights are, now, under direct, coordinated attack by enemies, both foreign and domestic.

We are, in fact, surrounded.

So then:

"We're surrounded. That simplifies our problem of getting to these people and killing them." Col. Lewis "Chesty" Puller - USMC
 
Last edited:
susano said:
Support is good but now they now they need to back that up with action and send their states guards to the Texas border. While this showdown is in Eagle Pass, it's also going to have to extend way beyond that! That's a long border.
Click to expand...

Better to make preparations to guard the border with enemy territory. Virginia and West Virginia, for example, have a dangerous border with the District of Columbia.
 
Anti Federalist said:
He would say:

There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights.

Our homes and our Bill of Rights are, now, under direct, coordinated attack by enemies, both foreign and domestic.

We are, in fact, surrounded.

So then:

"We're surrounded. That simplifies our problem of getting to these people and killing them." Col. Lewis "Chesty" Puller - USMC
Click to expand...

Yep. And I'd add that Gen Butler would be able to identify the plan and agenda being used right now to destroy America, and probably the players behind it.

The problem we have is the sophistication of the con-job being implemented. Many people don't even see that this is the time for "defense of our homes". They support the globalist plan because they have been deceived and conditioned.
 
cjm said:
I'm not going to say Virginia is great, but it's a far cry from DC. You might be thinking of Maryland.
Click to expand...

Okay thanks. I've never been to that area but thought everything touching DC was contaminated.
 
susano said:
I see those comments elsewhere, as well. Balkanization, the UN or Agenda 2021/30 plan of breaking the US into ten districts, etc. The thing is, what to do? If someone is punching you in the face to provoke a fight, do you just let them do it because you know that's their plan or do you fight back regardless of knowing you've been manipulated? If you don't fight back, you get destroyed. If do fight back you, at least, have a chance to make your own plan in the new set of circumstances which are beyond your control.
Click to expand...

Agree. The question is how to successfully oppose and defuse advanced Hegelian Dialectic?
 
Brian4Liberty said:
Yep. And I'd add that Gen Butler would be able to identify the plan and agenda being used right now to destroy America, and probably the players behind it.

The problem we have is the sophistication of the con-job being implemented. Many people don't even see that this is the time for "defense of our homes". They support the globalist plan because they have been deceived and conditioned.
Click to expand...

There the Marxists and globalists (sometimes the same, sometimes not) and the NPCs. I have three houses in my neighborhood who flew the Ukrainian flag. One still is. Another flew a Biden flag. I don't know how any kind of defense is mounted against that other than through education and we know who controls that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

PAF
Militarized Law Enforcement Reaches a New Level under Trump
Replies
17
Views
189
Invisible Man
I
Voluntarist
US Appeals Court Rejects Trump Bid To Revoke Thousands Of Migrants' Status
Replies
1
Views
35
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
PAF
Immigration-Control Tyranny
Replies
4
Views
111
acptulsa
acptulsa
PAF
Immigration Crackdown Hurting Ag, Labor Dept. Concedes
Replies
2
Views
36
TheTexan
TheTexan
Voluntarist
Immigration Detainments That Make You Say WTF
3 4 5
Replies
80
Views
716
nikcers
nikcers
Back
Top