it should be about getting existing supporters who haven't donated to put their money down. This works for rallying passionate supporters, but not more tentative supporters.
We would have no clear thematic element to really inspire people with it. The concept does not really communicate strongly what we are about.
I agree with this, so maybe a tittle that has more potential to grow with current events leading up to the donation date should be chosen. RE-VOTE! Poll has been spammed by Paul supporters

guilty I am.
Most uninvolved in the grassroots effort would find it pig-headed to insist Paul is the only candidate they should vote for in the presidential election.
Thats been considered, and NOBP has been spun not give any indication of the sort or sound like some type of ultimatum. Issue solved.
1. This concept has a strong unifying and dissident nature to it. People who have not donated are more likely to get excited by the general idea.
The only thing about SHH I don't like is there is no message, the establishment ignored so in response BTO, now the establishment is going after pauls supporters, were all potheads that don't know shit. it's so fucking insulting, and maybe we are all here overreacting with NOBP. Shhhh! May be a more tempered response, but it's just seems soo timid, I fear I will not as tittle inspire.
I agree with the rest of your comments good stuff, but I also believe we can spin, NOBP can help an idea whose time has come. Paul is quoting from Hugo.
Q. Are we at the tipping point? Maybe we can try and sell that too
Q. Or something about drawing a line in the sand? Ndaa soap etc?
Whats going on? WGO?
Anyway good post, just because there is majority for NOBP, doesn't guarantee the best results. But we shouldn't get stuck in debate either.