That answer assumes that the church fire was not a false flag attack.
I don't know whether it was a false flag attack or not. Nor does anyone else here. We probably all have guesses - some may be certain that it was a Trump supporter who did it, some may be certain that it was a false flag attack, but most of us are probably somewhere in between. To me (and what do I know?), it's probably about 50/50.
You would appear to be assuming (sorry if I am wrong) that Zippy thinks it was not false flag. But I don't know that, which is why I am asking Zippy.
You raise the bigger question of "counter balancing" and "showing both sides".
In order to know what the real picture is, I think there are at least four questions that need to be answered - and which I have no answers to:
1) Are attacks by Clinton supporters much more common than attacks by Trump supporters, or is it the other way around, or are they both about equally frequent?
2) Are attacks by Clinton supporters generally different in character to attacks by Trump supporters?
3) Are false flag attacks more common by anti-Trump people or anti-Clinton people - or is there little difference?
4) Does media reporting accurately represent what is happening with regard to these attacks - or does the media give a misleading impression that favors one side?