Trump Places DC Police Under FEDERAL CONTROL, Deploys National Guard

TheCount said:
Anyone tyrannized by violent crime rates at their lowest since 1970 needs to stop watching the news.
Click to expand...

Because obviously it's being overblown on purpose to convince idiots to trade liberty for "security".

Obviously.

Obviously.

spudea said:
Tyranny is living in fear that you can't walk down the street without being killed, that puts a cage on your mind where you can't even hope to dream of liberty and safety, and society completely succumbs to chaos.
Click to expand...

the-clit-has-around-8000-nerve-endings-and-its-still-not-as-sensitive-as-a-conservative-man-on-the-internet.jpg
 
unknown said:
Click to expand...

A full breakdown of who Nick Fuentes is, who’s backing him and why.This is very detailed with clips of him describing all of my claims. The dude openly promotes pedophelia and honey pots his listeners.Over and over again. I don’t think he’s a fed.It’s way way worse.

Code: 
https://x.com/OwenBenjamin/status/1955162173044560276

 
Dave Smith | The Feds on the Street | Part Of The Problem 1294
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zXJMLJ2fdjo
{Dave Smith | 13 August 2025}

On this episode of Part Of The Problem, Dave is joined by Robbie "The Fire" Bernstein to discuss the national guard being deployed in DC, Dave seeing Tulsi Gabbard at Ron Paul's birthday, Trump's agreement with China regarding Nvidia, and more.

 
Trump Slashes D.C Gun Permit Wait List as Part of Violent Crime Crackdown

Code: 
https://slaynews.com/news/trump-slashes-dc-gun-permit-wait-list-violent-crime-crackdown/

slaynews.com

Trump Slashes D.C Gun Permit Wait List as Part of Violent Crime Crackdown - Slay News

President Donald Trump’s sweeping law-and-order crackdown in Washington, D.C., is delivering a major win for law-abiding residents seeking the right to protect themselves.
slaynews.com slaynews.com
 
Occam's Banana said:
DC Police CAUGHT Faking Crime Data
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZ8wkiXnwCo
{Actual Justice Warrior | 11 August 2025}

In this video, I discuss the recent scandal that the DC metro police have been manipulating crime data to make the city seem safer.

Sources:
Click to expand...

Occam's Banana said:
I see no particularly compelling reason to think that the motivated and deliberate underreporting & undercharging of violent crimes is somehow isolated to D.C. (In fact, that sort of thing is widespread enough that police even have a "term of art" for it: they call it "juking the stats".)

Among the variety of techniques they use to downplay crimes (especially violent crimes) is to discourage victims from filing reports, and to undercharge perpetrators when they are caught. Both of those techniques were employed to downplay the rash of random women being randomly punched in NYC last year (see, for example, @9:35-11:15 in the video quoted below).

Given the explicitly soft-on-crime social policies of the progressive left - "defund the police", bail "reform", minimizing or eliminating jail time or prison sentences (even for violent offenders), etc. - I'd be amazed if they weren't doing it in most "blue" venues (i.e., almost all large cities) to one degree or another.
Click to expand...

A man went to prison for assaulting me. DC Police crime stats show he was never arrested
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...me-dc-crime-stats-show-he-was-never-arrested/
{Anna Giaritelli | 14 August 2025}

Five years ago, I was violently attacked and sexually assaulted in broad daylight in Washington, D.C., by a homeless man. He served time in federal prison for what he did to me. But if you look for evidence that the attack happened in the city’s crime statistics, you won’t find it.

The truth of what happened to me and the D.C. government’s role in it is as much a public scandal as it is a personal trauma. D.C. police covered up the unspeakable wrong that the stranger did to me. Even though a judge sentenced my attacker to hard time in prison, D.C. police leadership would rather deceive the public and appear less dangerous than list mine and countless other sexual assaults on their website.

The extent of crime in D.C. has been debated by the Left and Right since President Donald Trump announced on Monday that he would take federal action to crack down on problems in the District of Columbia.

But if the public wants to have an honest conversation about crime in D.C., the MPD will first have to be honest about how prevalent crime is. Without MPD’s honesty about the crimes that it has chosen to hide from its public-facing stats page, the White House cannot get an accurate picture of how bad the problem actually is and adequately fix it.

For me, the story began long before that attack. I was a Washingtonian for seven years. I was saving up money to buy a condo and planned to spend the next few decades in Washington, the intersection of politics and media. D.C.’s crime problem was something you lived with. You took Ubers and Lyfts, told others if you were walking after dark so they knew when you were home, and knew to be aware of your surroundings, almost to the point of paranoia. (Ladies?)

On a Saturday morning in 2020, I walked out of my apartment on Capitol Hill to mail a package at a post office several blocks from the U.S. Capitol. I put on my black sweatshirt and black sweatpants then headed out the door.

I never made it to the post office.

Just one block from my apartment building’s entrance, I was attacked by a large man well over six feet tall. He charged at me for a reason that I still do not understand. In broad daylight and on well-traveled 2nd Street NE next to Union Station, I fought to get away as he sexually assaulted me. If it had not been for others in the vicinity, including a construction worker named Donny who heard my screaming and ran to my rescue, I don’t know if I would be here today.

Despite my background working with federal law enforcement, it was only through my experience as a victim that I learned personally of two ways that D.C. police and the courts fail the public. I share those now with the hope that they inform the public and leaders to improve how crime is handled and prevented.

My attacker was arrested on the street months later, charged, and pleaded guilty to a sex abuse charge nearly two years later. MPD’s “Crime Cards” online statistics page omits mentioning it, though. Do you know what that communicates to a victim? How invalidating that is?

When I asked MPD in 2020 why my incident was not on its crime map, an MPD spokesman said the city only includes 1st degree felonies under its crime stats. That would mean that for every person robbed, assaulted, or sexually abused in anything less than egregious ways, you have not been counted into the total tally. The pain you suffered was not severe enough, according to MPD’s standards.

In a follow-up email to the MPD this week, an MPD spokesperson stated after a back-and-forth exchange that the map includes some sex abuse charges, but not all of them. In my case, my attacker’s crime against me, which landed him in prison, is still not listed.

“In an effort to provide more clear information about the most serious sex assaults that are most closely aligned with the public’s perception of rape and attempted rape, the most serious sex abuse categories are included in the reports of DC Code Index Violent Crimes,” the MPD Crime Cards website states in the bottom right corner at the bottom of a scroll within the page.

The Left and out-of-touch elite reporters have purported this week that things are fine in Washington because crime is trending down, while the Right has maintained that the Metropolitan Police Department’s statistics have been manipulated to paint a rosier picture of the situation. Turns out, it is actually worse than they knew.

The D.C. Police did do something right. The day of my attack, the police collected my clothes for DNA evidence. About two months later, they contacted me to say they had had a match to the DNA of a homeless man who had been previously arrested.

Police arrested him, but he was immediately released from jail by the judge who presided over the case. The assistant U.S. Attorney who prosecuted my case told me it was to keep the D.C. jail from overcrowding.

Here I was, a single woman who was attacked a block from my front door. Not jailing him until trial felt like a death sentence. How could I leave my home with him out on the streets, living in a tunnel a few blocks from where I lived?

Trial proceedings were set to begin in the fall of 2020, but amid the George Floyd riots in downtown Washington, it was delayed until early 2021. Then, the early 2021 start was delayed until the end of 2021. The U.S. Attorney’s office assured me it was not because the federal prosecutors were busy bringing hundreds of cases against January 6th offenders.

But all the while, the man who attacked me in April 2020 was out there. I moved across town to try to reclaim my life in the city.

The U.S. Attorney’s office would inform me through mail notifications and phone calls of updates to my case.

He was arrested in five separate incidents after being released, and after each arrest, the judge permitted his immediate release, even when he was caught in public with a machete.

The D.C. police officers on patrol must have been as aggravated as I was. Over and over again, they arrested a man with a previous criminal history only to have him right back on the street a day later.

I have thought about these failures by the police and courts for the past five years, but I have not been sure how to bring attention to them. Right now, we have a rare chance to bring meaningful change.

I have shared my story. Will anyone hear it and respond?

Anna Giaritelli is a homeland security reporter for the Washington Examiner. This is her first op-ed.
 
Occam's Banana said:
Despite my background working with federal law enforcement
Click to expand...

Hmmm...

Occam's Banana said:
I have shared my story. Will anyone hear it and respond?

Anna Giaritelli is a homeland security reporter for the Washington Examiner. This is her first op-ed.
Click to expand...

I read it, and I'll respond. My solution might seem oversimplistic, but typically, addressing the root of the problem yields the best results.

1. If attacks are that prevalent [or prevalent at all], perhaps it is time to revisit the 2nd Amendment. Seriously. Making a statement:
"Despite my background working with federal law enforcement" without mentioning or revisiting the 2nd Amendment makes me second guess everything else that you write.

2. After addressing step 1., see how it goes before moving to step 3. It just may save tax payers money, and protect more lives - including your own.
 
PAF said:
Hmmm...



I read it, and I'll respond. My solution might seem oversimplistic, but typically, addressing the root of the problem yields the best results.

1. If attacks are that prevalent [or prevalent at all], perhaps it is time to revisit the 2nd Amendment. Seriously. Making a statement:
"Despite my background working with federal law enforcement" without mentioning or revisiting the 2nd Amendment makes me second guess everything else that you write.

2. After addressing step 1., see how it goes before moving to step 3. It just may save tax payers money, and protect more lives - including your own.
Click to expand...

The people want law enforcement not everyone dueling eachother with guns.

The second amendment is for protecting our liberty from a corrupt government- oh I see what you did there.

The answer to every problem isn't 1776.

To you 1+1=1776.

You know we could have avoided a civil war if people didnt have your attitude and all of those people wouldn't have had to die.

We could have just debated it over and over like we did the decades proceeding the civil war I know that debate didnt work but perhaps another 30 years of debate would have just changed their hearts and minds.
 
Last edited:
nikcers said:
You know we could have avoided a civil war if people didnt have your attitude and all of those people wouldn't have had to die.
Click to expand...

Yea it's a shame all those people had to die. The North had no choice really. Not invading the South really wasn't an option :up:
 
Occam's Banana said:
DC Dems Begged for POLICE, Trump Sent Them—Now They Fake Crime Stats & Cry Racism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-l3rfrUlMyU
{Nate The Lawyer | 18 August 2025}

Click to expand...


Left - Right - March in Lockstep.

Whether legal or not, both sides scream for government to "do something".

What the video did not cover was the fact that [even if legal] 3 other states have already deployed their National Guard to D.C. The problem with that is that those states can potentially decide to hire even more National Guard to make up the difference for future deployments, which can/will lead to an increase of goons in uniform.

Are there any activist boots on the ground in the D.C. area who are advocating for the 2nd Amendment, so that individuals can address their own problems?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

PAF
Trump deploys National Guard to Memphis, calls it ‘replica’ of Washington crackdown
Replies
0
Views
13
PAF
PAF
PAF
3 states sending 700 National Guard troops to DC
2 3
Replies
51
Views
272
acptulsa
acptulsa
PAF
How Trump’s DC Takeover Could Supercharge Surveillance
Replies
0
Views
9
PAF
PAF
PAF
Trump Wants To Bring Back Department of War
Replies
9
Views
55
acptulsa
acptulsa
PAF
The Police State Has a New Playbook: Martial Law, One City at a Time
Replies
1
Views
24
PAF
PAF
Back
Top