FaceBook to stifile political activism

[kahless]

Well, I think I owe you one to. I get that your position is to take that risk for the greater cause of liberty. That is something I can respect from those that lead but what about the followers. I do not want to see the followers of those in the liberty movement be wiped out or coerced into submission some day since they were foolish enough to provide their real names and that of all their connections to such sites.

 

[angelatc]

The only thing better than posting an article that's already been posted is posting an article that was posted months ago. I suppose there's not any point in bumping other people's threads, though.

 

[GunnyFreedom]

Well, I think I owe you one to. I get that your position is to take that risk for the greater cause of liberty. That is something I can respect from those that lead but what about the followers. I do not want to see the followers of those in the liberty movement be wiped out or coerced into submission some day since they were foolish enough to provide their real names and that of all their connections to such sites.

No worries, thing is we are all in this fight. The signers of the Declaration would have gotten nowhere without the soldiers in Washington's army. I can respect those who do not want to take the risk, and I can understand why...but for those who ARE willing to take the risk, I will do all that I can to empower them, and make certain that risk is not in vain.

If we lose this fight, then nobody is safe, period. So winning is really our only option. While I consider RP2012 to be the biggest battle in this fight, it is not the total extent of the fight. We MUST win this fight, even if we lose the RP2012 battle. Winning RP2012 will go a long, LONG way towards winning the fight, however.

 

[CaptainAmerica]

No worries, thing is we are all in this fight. The signers of the Declaration would have gotten nowhere without the soldiers in Washington's army. I can respect those who do not want to take the risk, and I can understand why...but for those who ARE willing to take the risk, I will do all that I can to empower them, and make certain that risk is not in vain.

If we lose this fight, then nobody is safe, period. So winning is really our only option. While I consider RP2012 to be the biggest battle in this fight, it is not the total extent of the fight. We MUST win this fight, even if we lose the RP2012 battle. Winning RP2012 will go a long, LONG way towards winning the fight, however.

OMG......don't compare this to Washington's Continental Army. There is a difference between being smart,clever,sneaky and being out and open like Richard Simmons when it comes to organizing peaceful protests and attending campaign events.Just because some of us refuse to be on spybook and GoogleBrother doesn't mean we don't communicate by other means.

 

[GunnyFreedom]

OMG......don't compare this to Washington's Continental Army. There is a difference between being smart,clever,sneaky and being out and open like Richard Simmons when it comes to organizing peaceful protests and attending campaign events.Just because some of us refuse to be on spybook and GoogleBrother doesn't mean we don't communicate by other means.

If you don't like them, then don't use them. Those who are willing to take the risks involved in order to help save our country are genuine patriots, and your derogation of them is insulting.

 

[kahless]

I can see both sides of it since not using Facebook at all would reduce the reach of the message and allow opponents to dominate Facebook.

The problem is most people do not see using it as a risk and act accordingly. They may be in for a rude awakening some day if this movement fails and their support of tea party values for example are considered a terrorist threat.