BuddyRey
Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2007
- Messages
- 11,172
You may think it heretical of me to ponder correlations between the Communist Revolution and the Ron Paul Revolution, as the first was an effort to shackle mankind, while the latter is an effort to break those shackles. But, even if the two revolutions are complete ideological opposites of one another, there are some things we can learn from the tactics of our enemies.
As illustrated by the very informative videos G. Edward Griffin participated in on this topic (http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=Leninism+Vs.+Fabianism&hl=en&sitesearch=),
there was a sharp division in the mainstream of socialist thought near the dawn of the 20th century, resulting in the emergence of two distinct factions; Leninism and Fabianism.
The Leninists (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leninism) believed that the only way to secure their ideal society was with swift and violent overthrow of the government, to attack and topple it from the outside. The Fabian Socialists (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabianism) had a far more subtle plan; to clandestinely and incrementally enter the government power structure they loathed, to warp and subvert it from within.
So, what can we learn from the socialist divide? You can answer this question with remarkable ease by analyzing, in retrospect, who was more successful? The Leninists thrived for a time and accomplished their aim of setting up a despotic and oppressive regime in a relatively short period of time, but were soon mired in in-fighting, power struggles, betrayal, and eventual economic collapse.
The Fabianists are still working toward their ends, which have taken decades upon decades to advance to this point. Upon cursory examination, it would seem that the Fabianists failed. But a deeper analysis reveals the very opposite. Fabianists have attained levels of power with scope and influence far outreaching the Soviet States. One committed Fabian Socialist, Gordon Brown, is now the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom.
John Maynard Keynes, George Bernard Shaw, Bertrand Russel, and H.G. Wells, all of whom are still considered luminaries of modern thought, were members of the Fabian Society. This is not some whacked-out "Illuminati Lizard-Men" theory, but a real group, with a website you can visit yourself.
Nobody was around to stop the gradual march of the Fabianists, because nobody noticed them...until it was too late.
So, how do we undo the damage the Fabian Socialists have done, the extensive and unnoticed measures they've taken to insidiously unravel the tenets of Constitutional Government, Individual Liberty, and natural/God-given sovereignty of each human being equal among kings and heads of state? My opinion is, the best way to combat Fabianism is to adapt to it, not ideologically, but tactically.
I know it hurts, but at all costs, stay in the two-party system!!! We, as patriots and friends of liberty, cannot afford to let our understandable bitterness and disillusionment scatter us to the four winds. We need to take a lesson from our oppressors and reclaim our Republic in the same manner by which it was stolen from us!
As illustrated by the very informative videos G. Edward Griffin participated in on this topic (http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=Leninism+Vs.+Fabianism&hl=en&sitesearch=),
there was a sharp division in the mainstream of socialist thought near the dawn of the 20th century, resulting in the emergence of two distinct factions; Leninism and Fabianism.
The Leninists (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leninism) believed that the only way to secure their ideal society was with swift and violent overthrow of the government, to attack and topple it from the outside. The Fabian Socialists (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabianism) had a far more subtle plan; to clandestinely and incrementally enter the government power structure they loathed, to warp and subvert it from within.
So, what can we learn from the socialist divide? You can answer this question with remarkable ease by analyzing, in retrospect, who was more successful? The Leninists thrived for a time and accomplished their aim of setting up a despotic and oppressive regime in a relatively short period of time, but were soon mired in in-fighting, power struggles, betrayal, and eventual economic collapse.
The Fabianists are still working toward their ends, which have taken decades upon decades to advance to this point. Upon cursory examination, it would seem that the Fabianists failed. But a deeper analysis reveals the very opposite. Fabianists have attained levels of power with scope and influence far outreaching the Soviet States. One committed Fabian Socialist, Gordon Brown, is now the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom.
John Maynard Keynes, George Bernard Shaw, Bertrand Russel, and H.G. Wells, all of whom are still considered luminaries of modern thought, were members of the Fabian Society. This is not some whacked-out "Illuminati Lizard-Men" theory, but a real group, with a website you can visit yourself.
Nobody was around to stop the gradual march of the Fabianists, because nobody noticed them...until it was too late.
So, how do we undo the damage the Fabian Socialists have done, the extensive and unnoticed measures they've taken to insidiously unravel the tenets of Constitutional Government, Individual Liberty, and natural/God-given sovereignty of each human being equal among kings and heads of state? My opinion is, the best way to combat Fabianism is to adapt to it, not ideologically, but tactically.
I know it hurts, but at all costs, stay in the two-party system!!! We, as patriots and friends of liberty, cannot afford to let our understandable bitterness and disillusionment scatter us to the four winds. We need to take a lesson from our oppressors and reclaim our Republic in the same manner by which it was stolen from us!
Last edited:
