Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (READ IT! 110 pages!)

I'm reading through it now...One thing to be on the look out for is gaps or holes that allow someone to take advatage of it. For instance:

Some corporations are created with an end date that they will disolve the corporation. Does the bill let those people that intend to disolve their corporation bail themselves out when they don't intend to be a corporation in a year or two?

Can foreign banks sell stuff to US banks that can apply for the relief from the treasury and resell them back?
 
I don't have the mental capacity to understand it all, but from what I've read so far, it seems to give a carte blanche to Henry Paulson and whomever he appoints to help him carry out this project.

Paulson and Bernanke are even in charge of the oversight! Correct me if I'm wrong, because I hope that I am!
 
This plan is much bigger than 700 billion, it's infinite. It's an authorization to buy 700 billion at a time and hold only that 700 billion in debt.

Section 115. Graduated Authorization to purchase.

A(3) If, at any time after the certification in paragraph (2) has been made, the President transmits to the Congress a written report detailing the plan of the Secretary to exercise the authority under this paragraph, unless there is enacted, within 15 calendar days of such transmission, a joint resolution described in subsection (c), effive upon the expiration of such 15-day period, such authority shall be limited to $700,000,000,000 outstanding at one time.
 
I don't think I've ever seen a law in Congress that the bill itself sets rules on how the Senate may vote on the bill. This is the wierdest piece of legislation outside of the patriot act.

This is under Fast Track consideration in the House and Senate where it spells out how they should vote on it. How can you follow rules in a bill that isn't passed yet?
 
Okay I left off on page 54...just the usual stuff outside of what I noted above. Need sleep for work.
 
". . . experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms [of government], those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny . . ."
Jefferson also expressed this traditional, American viewpoint in his famous writing known as the Kentucky Resolutions, as adopted in 1798 by the Kentucky legislature, in these words in part:
". . . it would be a dangerous delusion were a confidence in the men of our choice to silence our fears for the safety of our rights: that confidence is everywhere the parent of despotism: free government is founded in jealousy and not in confidence; it is jealousy and not confidence which prescribes limited Constitutions to bind down those whom we are obliged to trust with power: that our Constitution has accordingly fixed the limits to which and no further our confidence may go; . . . In questions of power then let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution."


And this "bailout", does it still make its actions exempt from the Judicial??? (if so then it is assuredly not Constitutional amongst other reasons).


 
Section 111. Executive Compensation and Corporate Governance.
Provides that Treasury will promulgate executive compensation rules governing financial institutions that sell it troubled assets. Where Treasury buys assets directly, the institution must observe standards limiting incentives, allowing clawback and prohibiting golden parachutes. When Treasury buys assets at auction, an institution that has sold more than $300 million in assets is subject to additional taxes, including a 20% excise tax on golden parachute payments triggered by events other than retirement, and tax deduction limits for compensation limits above $500,000.

So, if I understand this correctly, the golden parachutes will be taxed at 20%? Who cares? If you company is failing, give a huge bonus to the execs on the way out. What does it matter if you get $30 Million and get taxed 20% on it?
 
And this "bailout", does it still make its actions exempt from the Judicial???

No, they knew that wouldn't hold up. But Section 119 places limits on it. All these "compromises" are just meant to make us feel like we're getting our way, and divert our attention from the fact that this whole thing is nothing but a big power grab.

This bill is full of holes.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.
(9) TROUBLED ASSETS.—The term ‘‘troubled assets’’ means—
(A) residential or commercial mortgages and any securities, obligations, or other instruments that are based on or related to such mortgages, that in each case was originated or issued on or before March 14, 2008, the purchase of which the Secretary determines promotes financial market stability;

So I guess that means the government can purchase my mortgage, simply because it thinks it should.
 
And all this bullshit that "the taxpayers might even profit." Well, that's not a reason to do it. The government doesn't exist to make paper profits. Government is not a business. It exists to serve the people within the rules of the Constitution. And in any case, if anyone actually believes this line, then why is there a bailout in the first place? Why not just change mark to market accounting rules and be done with it?
 
Yeah, they gave us the insurance and suspension of mark-to-market accounting rules, but that suggestion was meant to be *instead of* the $700 billion. Just adding it to the bill kind of misses the point.
 
(9) TROUBLED ASSETS.—The term ‘‘troubled assets’’ means—
(A) residential or commercial mortgages and any securities, obligations, or other instruments that are based on or related to such mortgages, that in each case was originated or issued on or before March 14, 2008, the purchase of which the Secretary determines promotes financial market stability;



Gee....I wish they would tell the public at large how buying "assets" that no one wants at a PRICE that is above the market value is promoting "market stability".....

It is the EXACT opposite....it is UNDERMINING the market and REWARDING IDIOTS for their MISTAKES.

Don't you love how the title of this "bill" states:

"To provide authority for the Federal Government to purchase and insure
certain types of troubled assets for the purposes of....protecting taxpayers, and for other purposes."
I would love to see CHEAPER PRICES!!! so why do any of us want to BUY worthless assets to try to keep Prices HIGH???

This must be the same reasoning that the US is in IRAQ to "protect the IRAQIS" (never mind how many get killed, how their own MONIES were pilfered under the "provisional authority" and how we are pressuring them to sign OIL LAWS to benefit our Corporations).


Viva la REVOLUTION.....let's get it on and drive these FED folks and other corrupt minions OUTSIDE of our borders!!! Let them sh*t on some other "bananna republic" exclusively in a foreign land.

 
The major things I saw while skimming through this are:
  • The new national debt ceiling is $11.3 trillion
  • "Bailouts" could start as early as October 1st
 
I don't think people understand what this bill does.

It is putting the final nails in the coffin meant for the republic.

The greatest power congress has (greater than even impeachment, because new puppets can be put in place at anytime),
is the power of the purse, it was the one thing, the TPTB craves to take away and now they are moving in for the kill.

Once congress loses this power (and they will eventually give up economic management over to the executive branch and the fed),
the American People, have nothing left with which to manage their own destiny.
 
Last edited:
by the loose language of this bill, it could mean chinese authorities can take over us properties, since that is who we are indebted to.
 
(1) to immediately provide authority and facili-
ties that the Secretary of the Treasury can use to
restore liquidity and stability to the financial system

*

(5) FINANCIAL INSTITUTION.—The term ‘‘fi-
nancial institution’’ means any institution, including,
but not limited to, any bank, savings association,
credit union, security broker or dealer, or insurance
company
, established and regulated under the laws
of the United States or any State, territory, or pos-
session of the United States, the District of Colum-
bia, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Commonwealth
of Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, American
Samoa, or the United States Virgin Islands, and
having significant operations in the United States,
but excluding any central bank of, or institution
owned by, a foreign government.

*

The term ‘‘troubled
assets’’ means— residential or commercial mortgages
and any securities, obligations, or other instruments…
and any other financial instrument that the
Secretary, after consultation with the Chairman
of the Board of Governors of the Federal Re-
serve System, determines the purchase of which
is necessary
to promote financial market stability

*

The Secretary is authorized
to establish a troubled asset relief program (or
‘‘TARP’’) to purchase, and to make and fund com-
mitments to purchase, troubled assets from any fi-
nancial institution, on such terms and conditions as
are determined by the Secretary


*

Establish-
ment of the policies and procedures and other simi-
lar administrative requirements imposed on the Sec-
retary by this Act are not intended to delay the com-
mencement of the TARP.

*

INGENERAL.—The Secretary shall im-
plement any program
under paragraph
through an Office of Financial Stability, estab-
lished for such purpose within the Office of Do-
mestic Finance of the Department of the Treas-
ury, which office shall be headed by an Assist-
ant Secretary of the Treasury, appointed by the
President,


To what end does one strain one’s eyes and credulity to read the rest? Congress turns sweeping authority over to a man of dubious character as readily as a frightened pedestrian hands his wallet to a mugger. All else is mental masturbation after conference of title and crown upon a Money Czar.

Curiously, when I went to save Paulson’s Emergency Fund document as a PDF, its title came up as: ‹ u $ ∆ » Û : R B Ô } ( æ ¨ l ± ≤ … j ` R B ‰ W Ø · ¿ — Y w Í

That can't be good, nor is the Not In MY Portfolio Bailout.

Congress abrogates its responsibility and is derelict in its duty.


FLOOD THEM WITH LEGAL
 
I wonder how much $$ they are going to use to create this NEW gov. AGENCY????


Totally crazy. Maybe an Asteroid will Hit DC today or tomorrow and save us all.:D
 
Back
Top