Eliminate women's suffrage?

Should we eliminate women suffrage?

  • Yes

    Votes: 47 25.0%
  • No

    Votes: 127 67.6%
  • I don't know because I have to consult a dictionary

    Votes: 14 7.4%

  • Total voters
    188
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, because it reinforces the idea that you need permission for your "group" in order to do something.
 
Eliminate women's suffrage?



Of course I'm (mostly) joking. :p


But has anyone ever noticed that our country started to turn really socialistic when women began to vote?

Correlation does not always = causation, however I think the coincidence is interesting.


Thoughts?
Barefoot, pregnant, and illiterate. Like God intended.
 
We live in a world where women are given 200 lashes and six months in prison for being gang raped. We live in a world where women are kicked like dogs in the street, kept illiterate, and violated in every way. Honor killings of rape victims. Women who are sentenced to gang rape by the city elders for crimes of their brothers. Child brides are sold at ages of 8 and 9. That is why this thread is disgusting. Where are the others calling out the members of this forum on this thread. Is there no decency?

In contrast, our country has risen to the level it has by and large by treating women as equals. This allows us to increase productivity and has many other benefits to society.
 
We live in a world where women are given 200 lashes and six months in prison for being gang raped. We live in a world where women are kicked like dogs in the street, kept illiterate, and violated in every way. Honor killings of rape victims. Women who are sentenced to gang rape by the city elders for crimes of their brothers. Child brides are sold at ages of 8 and 9. That is why this thread is disgusting. Where are the others calling out the members of this forum on this thread. Is there no decency?

In contrast, our country has risen to the level it has by and large by treating women as equals. This allows us to increase productivity and has many other benefits to society.

Uh... you do know that women weren't allowed to vote in America prior to 1920, right?
 
what kind of asswipe posts a poll like this?

this is just the kind of shit that get's ron paul's message relegated to the "Libertarian and Kooky" dung heap.
 
Uh... you do know that women weren't allowed to vote in America prior to 1920, right?

You can go back to the "good old days" HAH, Have fun! Look at what OUR society has accomplished since 1920. Look at what Societies that oppress women have accomplished since 1920. Get Real.
 
You can go back to the "good old days" HAH, Have fun! Look at what OUR society has accomplished since 1920. Look at what Societies that oppress women have accomplished since 1920. Get Real.

Look at what societies that "oppress" women accomplished prior to 1920: Beethoven, Newton, Plato, the Industrial Revolution, the US constitution, the Enlightenment, the Colossus of Rhodes, and much, much more.
 
Look at what societies that "oppress" women accomplished prior to 1920: Beethoven, Newton, Plato, the Industrial Revolution, the US constitution, the Enlightenment, the Colossus of Rhodes, and much, much more.

The USA has accomplished more in science, technology, and every other area exponentially since 1920. Healthcare, economics, production, communication, transportation, every single area and it has all been since women have had the right to vote. The gains in the eras prior are miniscule to the gains in knowledge made in the last one hundred years. If you don't want to let women vote, move to one of the backwords countries that don't let women vote. That should be evidence enough of what happens. I don't hope you get raped in the ass--by ten men. In fact, God bless you all. God bless those that speak evil against women in this forum to degrade, sexualize and insult them. God have mercy on this country despite what we have become and restore the nation. Let Ron Paul win, Lord. AMEN!
 
I can't say what NEW Ron Paul supports this of the misogyny on this thread but I know what one OLD Ron Paul supporter thinks. I am having second thoughts about supporting Ron Paul. To work with people who are called kooks by enemies are one thing. To be called what some here call women by fellow supporters is something else.
 
Not funny. My wife who has spent hundreds of hours supporting Ron Paul is now sobbing and threatening to withdraw from the campaign feeling rejected. For what? What do you get out of chasing women from this campaign? This is about Ron Paul winning or the alternative. Get serious. Think about what you are doing with everything you do in this campaign. If you want to reject women, do it as part of your personal life. It has no place in the Ron Paul campaign.
 
An afterthought. Tonight on the Glenn Beck program, Glen Beck showed some video footage to Ron Paul during the commercial break of a hostile Ron Paul supporter. Glen Beck said he had been maligned and threatened by Ron Paul supporters. Ron Paul had to spend some of his valuable air time on the defensive to compensate for the excesses of some of his supporters. It was a waste of his time and put RP into a negative association. I assume you meant no harm but as the saying goes, "loose lips sink ships". Iowa is just seventeen days away. We don't get a second chance. We all have to focus. Idle discussions belong on other websites.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top