Rick Santorum DRUDGE: "Santorum's Satan Warning" (attacks mainline Protestantism)

Rick Santorum is crazy. Its quite ironic that neo-cons such as Santorum always have a boogieman to blame.They can never look in the mirror and say "wow,we really messed up didn't we". Santorum should take the plank out of his own eye.

Yeah, but the boggie man this time is Protestantism :eek::eek::eek:

The White House contender described how Satan is even taking hold of some religions.

"We look at the shape of mainline Protestantism in this country and it is in shambles, it is gone from the world of Christianity as I see it."

Developing...
 
Yep, if 3rd party was viable for even a decent percentage of Americans, then clearly Dr. Paul would have gone in that direction, but we're fighting a two-party system. It's easy to marginalize a segment like they did with the "tea party", but it is far harder for them to stop our momentum when we're working within their party, by their rules, and winning over their voters.

This. I think I'm finally starting to understand why people are so adamant about Ron not running third party. Even though I honestly do believe he would win if he did. It's because it would instantly reverse all the progress we have made in taking over the GOP. And in the long run, that would be a very bad thing. I'm just not so sure we have a long run without Ron getting elected in 2012.
 
Meh. Saying Satan is out to destroy America will resonate with many fundamentalists. But this is a bit disturbing.

"We look at the shape of mainline Protestantism in this country and it is in shambles, it is gone from the world of Christianity as I see it."

Isn't Santorum Catholic?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rick_Santorum#Catholic_Online_article_regarding_sexual_abuse_incidents

The Catholic Rick Santorum attacking mainline protestant churches as "not being Christian"....now that could hurt him.

You would think so, but Mainline Protestantism is so weak-wristed and non-judgmental these days, the consensus would be, "Meh, whatever...."
 
He will blow up the world.

I don't think he's crazy, he's just another flavor pushed by the establishment. He has a group that appeals to his rhetoric... the rest just follow whoever has momentum and is being pushed by the media. Santorum came on Becks show the other day and basically thanked Beck for laying the groundwork and promotion. They want anybody but Paul, I'm convinced it's really that simple.
 
You would think so, but Mainline Protestantism is so weak-wristed and non-judgmental these days, the consensus would be, "Meh, whatever...."

Mainline Protestantism is a bunch of dispensationalist, rapture-ready garbage. Having said that, it's still infinitely preferable to Rick Santorum's deluded interpretation of Scripture. Can it be any more obvious why the establishment is pushing Rick? It's to discredit REAL Christianity by lumping it together with Pharisee Santorum and is gaggle of idiot followers.
 
It'll galvanize their support if anything. The GOP has gone off the deep end...

On the money. More to the point, large swaths of the national population have gone off the deep end at either extreme. On the one side you have these religious nuts who buy into this sort of frothing insanity. On the other hand you have the materialists including socialists, progressives and other psychologically unsound sorts grasping after equally insane desires.

and isn't going to be a viable party any longer.

I disagree. It is exactly the resonant match between the GOP and the vast hoards of ignorant, stupid, and insane lunatics that strongly ensures the GOP's future. Besides, the way things are going, if there is in fact an endgame afoot, the GOP may likely last just long enough to serve its purpose, after which it will no longer matter what happens to it.

It is grievous folly in this day and age to adopt assumptions about the character of the general public, particularly when giving it undeserved credit for intelligence, integrity, industry, and knowledge of the basics such as human freedom. On the whole people are either bat-shit crazy, dumber than posts, crooked as the day is long at the poles, or hopelessly ignorant. I have observed a disturbingly common tendency for people to exhibit two or more of these individually frightening flaws. One should exercise extreme care in evaluating the population when taken as a single statistical entity.

Santorum is insane. I do not think this could be refuted by any honest clinician psychologist given the opportunity to examine him. But Santorum is largely a product of his environment This alone speaks volumes about American culture, which I will suggest is a major contributor to his world view. He and the people who support him are his analogs and number in the many tens of millions. The central question, then, is why are all these people cleaving to insane candidates who stand to only perpetuate and advance insane visions of humanity's future in a demented utopia? It is because of the current culture - the values with which they have been inculcated through a process of creeping advancement.

People want what they are taught to want, for the most part. This poses no danger up to the point that fundamental lines are not crossed. For example, if a bunch of people, even a great and overwhelming plurality wish to live in a socialist utopia, they should be free to do so. The problems begin when those people become willing to cross the boundaries of interpersonal respect by forcing those not interested to toe their line of lifestyle. This is the age old failing of humanity.

Unless the fundamental environment at large is kept "pure", for lack of a better term, we will face these problems. I see no way to keep it pure due to the very nature of things. That is why I believe that the choice between capitulation of the individual to collectivism or a fight to the death (literally) is all but inevitable.

Pandora's box is very real. Today we call it the human psyche.
 
Yeah, but the boggie man this time is Protestantism :eek::eek::eek:

The White House contender described how Satan is even taking hold of some religions.

"We look at the shape of mainline Protestantism in this country and it is in shambles, it is gone from the world of Christianity as I see it."

Developing...
Santorum is such a phony, or he has a "God" complex.
 
I wonder if the Gop really wants to win the election? it seems like the gOP's top priority is keeping Ron Paul pushed down.
 
I wonder if the Gop really wants to win the election? it seems like the gOP's top priority is keeping Ron Paul pushed down.
The interests have bought both sides of the aisle, so yes, they'll gladly concede 4 more years of Obama, than let Paul anywhere near the White House to mess up their corrupt gravy train.
 
The interests have bought both sides of the aisle, so yes, they'll gladly concede 4 more years of Obama, than let Paul anywhere near the White House to mess up their corrupt gravy train.

True, Obama has made an excellent Republican. The GOP still wins if Obama wins. They get four more years of one of their own and yet get to harness the anger of ignorant voters. It's a win-win.
 
Every time the other candidates say something in this vane, encourage it, nothing says silly more than the guy saying it.
 
Since Santorum is seemingly such a devout Catholic and "running as" a conservative, I would be very curious to hear what he says about the Catholic church being sanctuaries for illegal immigrants. Come to think of it, I'm not sure what Dr. Paul's position is on that ... does religious liberty and right of conscience trump rule of law? Anyone know the answer, from Dr. Paul's perspective? Obviously this question applies to cities that are not sanctuary cities.

I saw and episode on the tv show "In the Heat of the Night" that covered this. A Catholic church was giving sanctuary to a man from El Salvador at a time when there were still death squads in that country. Under those circumstances it is a time for civil disobedience since that's not much different from hiding Jews from the Nazis in Germany. The constitution doesn't protect you. (At least I can't think of a plausible argument). But sometimes you have to obey God rather than man. That said, I don't feel that economic refugees fit the same category. If you care that much you can always open a new mission south of the border.
 
Also, just want to add my perspective, as a Catholic. I would not say I'm devout, by any measure, but all my kids attend a Catholic school and, from that perspective, Rick Santorum is EXTREME. Not only for this, but for saying insurance shouldn't cover amnio procedures... that's CRAZY!!!! Without an amnio, I wouldn't have known I was having twins b/c my doc didn't catch the extra heart beat (maybe TMI here, sorry -- just trying to illustrate how CRAZY this guy is). Santorum says amnio shouln't be covered because it is used by doctors to recommend abortions for babies with downe synrome. Now maybe some holy rollers might love what he's selling, but no catholics I know!!!!

Interesting. Our doctor missed the 2nd heartbeat on the first ultrasound too, but this was picked up on the second ultrasound. Regardless, your point is 100% valid. Maybe the parents of a downe syndrome baby would be better prepared if they knew what they were having? What's done with the information isn't the fault of the information.
 
Rick Santorum: "Satan has his sights on the United States of America!"

Link
Another Link

Satan has his sights on the US just as he's had his sights on every part of the world with human souls since the beginning. So? That's something that we have to deal with as individuals or by coming together of our own free will with friends, family and those in our churches. The federal government is not the institution to fight Satan with, become a missionary Rick.
 
I don't see how this is news. Isn't this pretty much the same type of thing fanatical Christians say all the time?

I agree on the "Satan wants to destroy America" part. It's the "mainline protestants aren't Christians" part that could hurt him since most of the idiots voting for this man are mainline protestants.

You would think so, but Mainline Protestantism is so weak-wristed and non-judgmental these days, the consensus would be, "Meh, whatever...."

These "non-judgemental" protestants seemed happy to "judge" Ron Paul for being too much like Jesus when it comes to other countries. And they're happy to judge anyone who isn't up in arms about "radical Islam" and "sharia law". That's all they care about these days. You can support appointing gays to your cabinet as long as you make it about fighting "sharia law".

 
It was amusing listening to Hannity while out doing errands trying to defend Santorum with basically saying "What, we can't talk about evil?" Not mentioning the whole anti-protestant part of what he said. It's quite entertaining listenting to these spinmasters trying to fit this into their narrative.
 
It was amusing listening to Hannity while out doing errands trying to defend Santorum with basically saying "What, we can't talk about evil?" Not mentioning the whole anti-protestant part of what he said. It's quite entertaining listenting to these spinmasters trying to fit this into their narrative.

That's why we have to make this about attacking protestantism. I hate to play the "sectarian" card, but he's the one that went there.
 
Yep, if 3rd party was viable for even a decent percentage of Americans, then clearly Dr. Paul would have gone in that direction, but we're fighting a two-party system. It's easy to marginalize a segment like they did with the "tea party", but it is far harder for them to stop our momentum when we're working within their party, by their rules, and winning over their voters.

I completely agree. Ron Paul did try with a 3rd party, the strongest 3rd party at the time, in the 80s and got less than 0.5% of the vote.
 
Back
Top