He's going to trip over his words a bit but he needs to frame the foreign policy argument differently. Frame it in terms of the Constitution and the upcoming insolvency of the wars, not based on what OBL said (even though it's so silly to ignore what the supposed enemy says but I guess that's 'patriotic' to a lot of the GOP)
Say "I blame the terrorists for 9/11". And then say whatever else.
Because he'll try to explain how cause and effect works. And they everyone will boo, and say "he's blaming the US for 9/11"
And we can all say "What are you talking about? Ron Paul said "I blame the terrorists for 9/11" Are you stupid, or a liar?"
The key word is Blame.
He might just have to explain "Ron Paul's theory of Blame".
The Middle East is full of crazy terrorists who blow themselves up when they're pissed off.
They are to blame for 9/11.
9/11 is the fault of the crazy terrorists. The crazy terrorists are to blame.
Did we know there were crazy terrorists there? Yes.
Did we know that crazy terrorists were pissed off by what we did? Yes.
The people who do the thing are always at fault. The people who do the thing are always to blame.
But we shouldn't be so fucking stupid. We know that pissing off the crazy people, the people who
have been blowing themselves up when they get pissed since 1947, might cause them to come here and continue
to do what they've always been doing. It's not our fault that we're so foolish. Terrorism is always unacceptable.
The terrorists are always at fault. The terrorists are always to blame. People are dead. If we get attacked again,
the terrorists should be blamed. The terrorists are at fault. But I care more about saving lives than pointing fingers.
Or, Ron Paul could go truther.