Donald Trump's 2024 POTUS campaign

[PAF]

A friend of mine sent me a post that seems to indicate Trump shooting his mouth off about the Medal of Honor not being worth much.

Oh, that Medal of Honor. At first I thought AF was referring to some voter out in the audience lol.

Well, now, $100 Million isn't anything to sneeze about.

Russian Israel collusion much? I mean, in the business world, ROI is always a priority. Right? Or was it just another nice gesture in addition to the neck tie.

But the Republican billionaire at the center of attention during the meal was not Mr. Trump — it was Dr. Miriam Adelson.

The former president, by then on a glide path to the Republican nomination, wanted financial support from Dr. Adelson.

She is poised to become one of the biggest donors in the presidential election — and, if Mr. Trump wins, one of the most powerful private citizens with a say in American foreign policy.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/25/us/politics/miriam-adelson-trump-israel.html

 

[Sonny Tufts]

"Bone Spurs" Trump should be the last person to denigrate military members, especially those who received the Congressional Medal of Honor. All MOH awardees are either dead or in bad condition?? Can anyone possibly be any dumber? Yes, Trump can.

 

[jmdrake]

Really, how is Trump screwing this up?

Kamala is not likelable. SHe's about an unlikelable ans Hillary. Trump just keeps shooting himself in the foot.

 

[Swordsmyth]

You haven't a clue what the issue with the PA process was. The PA Supreme Court had held that the PA Constitution's provision for free and equal elections required extending the deadline for submitting mail-in and absentee ballots. Texas's argument was based on the astonishing claim that in devising the rules for selecting electors a state legislature isn't bound by its state constitution. This theory, called the Independent State Legislature Doctrine, had been previously rejected by SCOTUS in Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, 576 U.S. 787 (2015), a case involving the authority of state legislatures under the Article I Elections Clause. It was rejected again in Moore v. Harper, 600 U.S. 1 (2023), another case involving the Article I Elections Clause. The reasoning in those cases would also apply to a case involving the Article II Elections Clause, such as Texas' complaint.



B.S. Texas wasn't injured at all; all of its electoral votes went to Trump, and that's all Texas and its voters were entitled to.

All three Trump appointees were of the view that Texas lacked standing. But Trump lemmings such as yourself would never consider for a second that those three and the other 4 in the majority just might know a bit more than you about the law of standing and that maybe, just maybe, they got it right. No, under your outlook they "chickened out", as if their lifetime appointments were meaningless.

You have no clue about all the different ways they cheated in PA.
The whole nation was injured by PA installing Joe Biden, Texas voters and all other voters had their votes made meaningless because their contribution was nullified by PA cheating.

 

[Swordsmyth]

A friend of mine sent me a post that seems to indicate Trump shooting his mouth off about the Medal of Honor not being worth much.

But there is doubt about the validity of it... so I withdrew it until I can confirm it...not to worry, it will be plastered all over the tubes in another 30 minutes reagrdless.

It's bunk, he said that getting the civilian award and being alive was better for the recipient than getting the MoH and being dead.

 

[acptulsa]

You have no clue about all the different ways they cheated in PA.
The whole nation was injured by PA installing Joe Biden, Texas voters and all other voters had their votes made meaningless because their contribution was nullified by PA cheating.

Republicans: Promoting federal tyranny by playing victim cards like snowflakes.

 

[acptulsa]

 

[Swordsmyth]

Republicans: Promoting federal tyranny by playing victim cards like snowflakes.

Glad to see you openly endorsing Demoncrat fraud, you get more and more open about your agenda all the time.

 

[acptulsa]

Glad to see you openly endorsing Demoncrat fraud, you get more and more open about your agenda all the time.

Speaking of our respective agendas, Shalom.

 

[Swordsmyth]

Speaking of our respective agendas, Shalom.

Pathetic propaganda.

 

[acptulsa]

Pathetic propaganda.

You've made that your screen name. Everyone thinks it when they see your avatar.

 

[unknown]

https://x.com/ImMeme0/status/1824790948859015461

 

[unknown]

 

[acptulsa]

I'm sure Kennedy would be glad to take her place. I wonder why Fox is just giving Trump free airtime instead? Not the Deep State's usual style to give a free hour of prime airtime to their enemies...

 

[Swordsmyth]

I'm sure Kennedy would be glad to take her place. I wonder why Fox is just giving Trump free airtime instead? Not the Deep State's usual style to give a free hour of prime airtime to their enemies...

They have no choice with Trump, and Trump doesn't want Kennedy to get a platform to steal his voters.

 

[acptulsa]

They have no choice with Trump...

Don't be asinine. It was a debate. Half the debaters quit. If things were as you claim they are, they'd have cancelled and called the whole thing off.

...and Trump doesn't want Kennedy to get a platform to steal his voters.

Suddenly what your great outsider who is hated by all the media wants has become important to the media?

And you don't consider that to be just the tiniest bit odd?

 

[Swordsmyth]

Don't be asinine. It was a debate. Half the debaters quit. If things were as you claim they are, they'd have cancelled and called the whole thing off.



Suddenly what your great outsider who is hated by all the media wants has become important to the media?

And you don't consider that to be just the tiniest bit odd?

They need Trump, they can't snub him without losing viewers, they already agreed to the debate.
If they invite RFKommie without Trump agreeing he'll cancel and they'll lose viewers.

Your fantasy about them wanting Trump died with the guy in the crowd at Butler.

 

[acptulsa]

They need Trump, they can't snub him without losing viewers, they already agreed to the debate.

If the fact that they agreed to air a debate was the problem they'd bring in another debater. If your Trumpy Bear refused to debate Kennedy -- again -- because he's scared to -- still -- then they could cancel without penalty.

I admit that after watching Trump tweet in support of both sides of nearly every issue throughout 2016, there's no doubt at all Trump could debate against himself. But it still doesn't qualify as a debate unless there are at least two podiums, and at least as many participants. Look the word up.

Losing viewers. A debate just turned into just another stump speech. They already lost viewers.

They don't have to give him an hour of prime airtime. But they're going to anyway. And you still insist they hate him. Sad!

Your fantasy about them wanting Trump died with the guy in the crowd at Butler.

Pollyanna. You care about Corey's life, and so do I. Neither Trump nor any other member of the Deep State gives a damn.

 

[Occam's Banana]

Dave Smith | Trump Is Shook | Part Of The Problem 1160
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47eqORGPJcc
{Dave Smith | 23 August 2024}

On this episode of Part Of The Problem, Dave is joined by co-host Robbie "The Fire" Bernstein for a discussion on the Elon Musk and Trump interview on X, what's lacking from Trump's campaign compared to 2016, Kamala Harris's staff ducking an interview question, and so much more!

Original air date: 8.13.24

 

[unknown]