Does anyone on here think President Trump was a dictator or will become one if re-electe

[acptulsa]

Meanwhile, the prosecution tries to reinterest the public in Trump by turning the whole thing into a dramatic race against time.

 

[Todd]

You mean his attempts to point out a corrupt election???

I'm no fan of Trump, but let's be real here... the 2020 election was a farce. (most of them are - but that one took the cake)

Some people like their election fraud more covert I guess…. like using big tech and corporate power to censor information flow.

 

[acptulsa]

Or maybe they won't give it to him. Maybe they plan on repeating the steal, and making it even more obvious this time.

https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1735041021254234376

 

[Philhelm]

His corrupt attempts to overturn election results certainly suggest that he has that tendency.

C'mon, that election was shady as hell. Just the push for mass mail-in voting alone (with a lack of chain-of-custody) was enough to have doubts. Combine that with Biden not even campaigning, the Democrats rigging their own primary against Sanders, Buttigieg, Klobucher, etc., more than a week to get the election results, more black votes for Biden than there were for Obama, only key swing states being delayed, Biden failing to meet most of the bellwether statistics, stopping the votes in some states at midnight, censorship of people questioning the election results ("9/11 was an inside job" was never censored like that), and so on. It's circumstantial evidence, but it all stinks, and nothing the government has done has given me the impression that they want secure elections.

 

[CaptUSA]

C'mon, that election was shady as hell. Just the push for mass mail-in voting alone (with a lack of chain-of-custody) was enough to have doubts. Combine that with Biden not even campaigning, the Democrats rigging their own primary against Sanders, Buttigieg, Klobucher, etc., more than a week to get the election results, more black votes for Biden than there were for Obama, only key swing states being delayed, Biden failing to meet most of the bellwether statistics, stopping the votes in some states at midnight, censorship of people questioning the election results ("9/11 was an inside job" was never censored like that), and so on. It's circumstantial evidence, but it all stinks, and nothing the government has done has given me the impression that they want secure elections.

Even funnier was that leading up to the election, the calls on the left were so loud that because of all the changes, it would take weeks to examine results to make sure there was no fraud. They cautioned Biden not to concede too early because they needed time to get their lawyers involved to make sure they got the result they wanted.

BUT, as soon as the press called it for Biden, you were not allowed to question the results publicly - big tech would silence you. They had a narrative that couldn't be questioned. "Move on now - nothing to see here" was the modus operandi.

 

[Philhelm]

Even funnier was that leading up to the election, the calls on the left were so loud that because of all the changes, it would take weeks to examine results to make sure there was no fraud. They cautioned Biden not to concede too early because they needed time to get their lawyers involved to make sure they got the result they wanted.

BUT, as soon as the press called it for Biden, you were not allowed to question the results publicly - big tech would silence you. They had a narrative that couldn't be questioned. "Move on now - nothing to see here" was the modus operandi.

Oh yes, I remember the "Red Mirage" article and how they were priming the public for the obvious. I knew the fix was in with the push for mass mail-in voting.

 

[RJB]

I hate to take this route because it has a bit of a cheesy connotation these days in this atmosphere of America bad mentality, but here you have guys storming a beach under bullets for the right to vote in the two party sham and half the US population is too lazy to get off their asses to drive a few blocks and wait a few minutes in line to vote and demand mail in ballots.Those men on the beach should have done a mail in invasion.

 

[Anti Globalist]

Heres an idea: If its so obvious that Trump will be reelected president, then everybody supporting and backing him should bet their entire bank account. Refusal to do so is proof that deep down they know he's going to lose.

 

[Occam's Banana]

Heres an idea: If its so obvious that Trump will be reelected president, then everybody supporting and backing him should bet their entire bank account. Refusal to do so is proof that deep down they know he's going to lose.

Have you eaten your shoes yet?

 

[nobody's_hero]

Heres an idea: If its so obvious that Trump will be reelected president, then everybody supporting and backing him should bet their entire bank account. Refusal to do so is proof that deep down they know he's going to lose.

I don't think anyone is saying it's obvious that he's going to win.

I think it's obvious that he has way more support than he did in 2020, simply because people have utterly lost faith in the mainstream narratives about him. Even if they were true, they've done 'cried wolf' too many times. Eventually, people are gonna ask themselves "Is this guy, Trump, really as bad as they say he is?" The answer of course is "no." It doesn't mean he's good. But for most of American voters, 'not as bad' is usually 'good enough.' You don't have to like it. That's just how it usually works. The problem is not that people believe Trump. The problem is that they're no longer believing what the MSM tells them to believe about Trump. Trump isn't gaining 'honesty', the media is losing 'credibility.' If anyone tunes into Sec. Jean-Pierre's press conferences, they're probably just doing it to see if she's ever going to master the art of being able to look people in the eyes whenever she tells lies. She still can't. Worst press secretary ever. If you're gonna appoint someone go out and tell lies on your behalf, they gotta be able to sell it.

Why do you think Trump is leading (smashing the competition) in the primary polls even though he hasn't shown up for a debate? Those aren't (all) 'I think Trump is fantastic!' votes, those are 'f*ck you' votes.

There are legitimate complaints against Trump regarding just how well he does (or doesn't) understand liberty, the Constitution, etc. However, people who mindlessly bark debunked myths like: 'he incited a deadly riot in D.C. to overthrow the government', or 'Russia collusion', and the classic 'he's gonna get us into WWIII' (despite the fact that we are now closer to WWIII during the Biden administration, with a potato in chief, than we'd ever be if Trump ruled for 100 years), . . . oh, and don't forget: 'He's Racist!!!,' have either shut up (maybe they don't want to lose what little perceived credibility they have left), or they're wound-up tinker toys who are still helplessly repeating these narratives because it's all they have. You might as well, at this point, throw 'he's gonna become a dictator if he wins' right into that pile. Cry wolf.

 

[Occam's Banana]

Media Warn If Trump’s Re-Elected Every Bad Thing They Can Possibly Imagine Will Happen
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjYOddl-CCA
{Grabien | 12 December 2023}

 

[Occam's Banana]

https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1735428648146989416

 

[acptulsa]

https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1735428648146989416

Every bad thing they said in 2016 and 2020 that Trump would do, Biden has done. So, I assume all these alleged Trump threats are in reality Biden campaign promises?

 

[vita3]

no to biden

no to trump

100%

 

[Invisible Man]

Serious question because I know a lot of people on this site hate Trump and many support him. Given past results, does anyone here actually think that if re-elected that President Trump (Grover 2.0) would actually act like or become a dictator this time around?

Figured out how to make a poll. So the question is answered "Yes" if you think Trump was a dictator in his last term as well. Thanks!

What do you mean "this time around"? Did you sleep through the COVID lockdowns?

 

[acptulsa]

no to biden

no to trump

100%

All they really need to put the hammer down on us and watch us thank them for doing it, is for us to allow them to tell us what our only choices are just one more time. Allow them to choose our choices, and believe it makes a difference, and we're cooked. Ready to serve by 2025.

 

[Sonny Tufts]

No, the fact that it's the only thing of which it could be ultimately dispositive does not mean it's the only thing.

Huh? First you say that it's a fact that it's the only thing, and then you say it isn't. I don't understand you.

Look, I read the statement as saying that dismissing such cases on procedural grounds ultimately disposes of nothing, which of course is false: in terms of the proceedings in the trial court (which are subject to whatever an appellate court might do) it disposes of the case. It determines that the plaintiff has no standing, that limitations has run, that the court has no jurisdiction, or that some other procedural ground exists. Moreover, in the event the ground is standing or limitations, it means that the plaintiff can't relitigate the issue (this is the doctrine of res judicata). What it doesn't do is ever get to the merits of the case.

And when he then says "except...", that tells me he's saying that the only thing that was disposed of (i.e., established) was that the judge (if sane) didn't want to hear the case.

If you or he are reading the language in some other way, please explain. I honestly don't see how there's any other interpretation.

 

[acptulsa]

Huh? First you say that it's a fact that it's the only thing, and then you say it isn't. I don't understand you.

Are you really this dense a person or do you just play one on the internet? Try not cutting out the middle of the sentence and see if it doesn't make sense to any sentient being.

Look, I read the statement as saying that dismissing such cases on procedural grounds ultimately disposes of nothing, which of course is false: in terms of the proceedings in the trial court...

Well, that was a mistake, wasn't it? What if court trials let persecut--er, I mean DAs dispose of things, and let judges dispose of things, but leave the people looking for justice still looking?

 

[Occam's Banana]

CLIP from SYSTEM UPDATE #201:

SUPERCUT: The US establishment's long history of calling every one of their enemies, "HITLER!"

https://twitter.com/BidenHQ/status/1737138277914689823

 

[Snowball]

funny poll results but no big surprise if you know the posters here well enough.

21 posters: No, Trump won't be a dictator
3 posters -Yes, Trump WILL BE A DICTATOR: acptulsa, Invisible Man, PAF

Donald freaking Trump. American Dictator.