Does anyone on here think President Trump was a dictator or will become one if re-electe

[nobody's_hero]

Fraud so obvious that precisely zero people have been able to prove any in any court of law despite dozens of attempts?

Why do you keep repeating this MSM talking point? If the courts won't even hear a case, you don't get a chance to "prove it in a court of law".

Baseball game gets cancelled due to weather, do you just automatically count it as a win for your team?

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

Trump fan fiction be like...

eagles have elevated status.

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

Why do you keep repeating this MSM talking point? If the courts won't even hear a case, you don't get a chance to "prove it in court of law".

Baseball game gets cancelled due to weather, do you just automatically count it as a win for your team?

What if the game was cancelled by rain caused by climate change?

 

[nobody's_hero]

What if the game was cancelled by rain caused by climate change?

If the analogy isn't too hard to follow:

It was probably cancelled because the umpire was either a democrat or republican with TDS who can't defeat their unfavored team in an honest challenge, so they had to cancel the game "due to weather". The weather was fine the whole time.

 

[TheCount]

Why do you keep repeating this MSM talking point? If the courts won't even hear a case, you don't get a chance to "prove it in a court of law".

Ask yourself which is more likely:
- A legal team led by Rudy Giuliani got laughed out of 62 courtrooms

- Every judge, regardless of ideology and party, across nine states, the District of Columbia, and the Supreme Court, are all part of a vast conspiracy to keep Trump out of office

 

[CaptUSA]

Ask yourself which is more likely:
- A legal team led by Rudy Giuliani got laughed out of 62 courtrooms

- Every judge, regardless of ideology and party, across nine states, the District of Columbia, and the Supreme Court, are all part of a vast conspiracy to keep Trump out of office

Did they change the voting rules in multiple states just ahead of the election? Yes or no?
Did those changes result in Biden receiving more "votes" than Obama? Yes or no?
Did the government and big tech collude to censor opposition voices ahead of the election? Yes or no?

If you said yes to any of those, then you already believe that the 2020 election was rigged. It doesn't take a "conspiracy" to deny standing. Quit playing your little game. You know, we know, and the American public knows.

 

[acptulsa]

A legal team led by Rudy Giuliani...

That's the rub. The original line of Trump bull insisted that he only hires the best people. If we assume this to be true, then the fact that Fauci was employed straight through indicates that his vast experience sweet talking gay guys into swallowing poison was just what Trump wanted in an NIH head. And Rudy is proof positive that Trump wanted someone experienced in torpedoing legitimate investigations for his commission.

They have to believe it to believe Trump only hires the best. But it contradicts the soap opera that all these DAs are spinning for them. And they do love that soap opera. Gives them victim cards to play.

But the ugly truth is, impeding investigations is the only thing 9iu11ani ever proved good at, much less The Best People for.

 

[TheCount]

Did they change the voting rules in multiple states just ahead of the election? Yes or no?

No

Did those changes result in Biden receiving more "votes" than Obama? Yes or no?

No

Did the government and big tech collude to censor opposition voices ahead of the election? Yes or no?

No

If you said yes to any of those, then you already believe that the 2020 election was rigged.

And if I didn't?

It doesn't take a "conspiracy" to deny standing.

Denying standing isn't the only thing that happened in those courtrooms, and in addition yes, it would take a nationwide judicial conspiracy to agree to deny standing in the 60+ courtrooms that Trump's cases failed in.

 

[TheCount]

That's the rub. The original line of Trump bull insisted that he only hires the best people. If we assume this to be true, then the fact that Fauci was employed straight through indicates that his vast experience sweet talking gay guys into swallowing poison was just what Trump wanted in an NIH head. And Rudy is proof positive that Trump wanted someone experienced in torpedoing legitimate investigations for his commission.

They have to believe it to believe Trump only hires the best. But it contradicts the soap opera that all these DAs are spinning for them. And they do love that soap opera. Gives them victim cards to play.

But the ugly truth is, impeding investigations is the only thing 9iu11ani ever proved good at, much less The Best People for.

You're absolutely right, all of the myths of Trump cannot simultaneously be true.


To me the most glaring issue is: Why were nearly none of the hundreds of millions of dollars of post-election day donations used to fight the results of the election?

 

[CaptUSA]

No
No
No
And if I didn't?
Denying standing isn't the only thing that happened in those courtrooms, and in addition yes, it would take a nationwide judicial conspiracy to agree to deny standing in the 60+ courtrooms that Trump's cases failed in.

Delusional. They declared emergencies in 2020, masked everyone up, dropped ID requirements, expanded voting days, put drop boxes everywhere, expanded mail-ins and you think nothing changed? Nice rewrite of history there. No wonder you can believe your own BS.

And I suppose you think they made up the Twitter files, Facebook files, and CTIL files?? Who's the conspiracy nut now?!

 

[acptulsa]

Delusional.

Believing everything the government says used to qualify one as delusional, back when psychiatry concerned itself with patients. Since that time government has embedded its grubby fingers deeply into the so-called science, and now anyone who parrots the government line is protected from that accusation no matter how asinine the official government line is.

 

[TheCount]

Delusional.

K

They declared emergencies in 2020

Trump's conspiracy against himself, I suppose.

masked everyone up

I'd love to know how this generated votes.

dropped ID requirements

Sure?

expanded voting days

K

put drop boxes everywhere

K

expanded mail-ins

K

and you think nothing changed? Nice rewrite of history there. No wonder you can believe your own BS.

All of this is just handwaving in the complete and utter absence of any kind of actual proof of fraud.

If you're baffled by the fact that the number of voters changed between 2008 and 2020, I really don't know what to tell you.

And I suppose you think they made up the Twitter files, Facebook files, and CTIL files?? Who's the conspiracy nut now?!

Who is "the opposition" in 2020 and how does any of that have anything to do with how many votes Trump got in that year?


If your answer is that the Trump administration is "the opposition" to itself, censored by itself, silenced by an agency that Trump signed into existence, run by a person Trump appointed, created through a bill written and sponsored by Republicans, passed by a Republican house and a Republican senate, then I'm simply not going to agree with you on that.

The required conspiracy against Trump would have to be so large that it would include Trump himself.

 

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

Judging from the replies I would have to guess that the count is the only Yes vote.

 

[vita3]

Cap tip for Trump creating first NEW military branch in 75 years (space force)

Also increasing military budget every year...

Empire Rules

 

[ClaytonB]

K



K



K

 

[Anti Globalist]

Washington Post seems to be worried...

Nobody cares what the Washington Post thinks. There were probably hundreds of headlines 3 years ago that were saying the same thing. The whole purpose of those headlines is to build Trump up so that he can get destroyed.

 

[ClaytonB]

Nobody cares what the Washington Post thinks. There were probably hundreds of headlines 3 years ago that were saying the same thing. The whole purpose of those headlines is to build Trump up so that he can get destroyed.

OK then

Do you rent out your crystal ball? I'm interested in taking a peek at crypto prices 12 months from now...

 

[acptulsa]

They're being so damned obvious. Somebody's getting played. Hard.

 

[nobody's_hero]

Ask yourself which is more likely:
- Every judge, regardless of ideology and party, across nine states, the District of Columbia, and the Supreme Court, are all part of a vast conspiracy to keep Trump out of office

It's really not that unbelievable, honestly. I'll go with that one.

It's no secret that a lot of the old guard don't like Trump. They want to go back to coronating neocons in scripted conventions reading teleprompters, but since 2016 a lot of regular ol' voters have this crazy notion that they actually can choose the president.

 

[acptulsa]

It's really not that unbelievable, honestly. I'll go with that one.

It really, really isn't. Especially since I believe the majority of them were federal courts.

That said, Rudy was still obviously hired to shoot himself in the foot.