Declare A National Emergency

Voluntarist

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2011
Messages
3,830
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115206570863756188 (I guess TruthSocial posts don't work with the "media" tags?)
The Federal Government, under my auspices as President of the United States of America, has stepped into the complete criminal mess that was Washington, D.C., our Nation’s Capital. Because of this, D.C. has gone from one of the most dangerous and murder ridden cities in the U.S.A., and even around the World, to one of the safest - In just a few weeks. The “place” is absolutely booming, with restaurants, stores, and businesses packed and, for the first time in decades, virtually NO CRIME. It has been a beautiful thing to watch but, now, under pressure from the Radical Left Democrats, Mayor Muriel Bowser, who has presided over this violent criminal takeover of our Capital for years, has informed the Federal Government that the Metropolitan Police Department will no longer cooperate with ICE in removing and relocating dangerous illegal aliens. If I allowed this to happen, CRIME would come roaring back. To the people and businesses of Washington, D.C., DON’T WORRY, I AM WITH YOU, AND WON’T ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN. I’ll call a National Emergency, and Federalize, if necessary!!! Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!! President DJT

I think they should have a website to document what the "National Emergency" of the day is. Maybe the best they can do though, is to get the National Guard in the streets informing everyone.



 
Doesn't this make us look authoritarian?

I do feel like maybe we need it to help reduce crime in this country. But when and where does it end?
 
Doesn't this make us look authoritarian?

I do feel like maybe we need it to help reduce crime in this country. But when and where does it end?

There are always consequences for actions taken but there are also consequences for inaction.

Probably the most consequential outcome will be a general reduction in threat perception.

This can be viewed as a positive as long as there are actual reductions in threats.

This is like if someone believes that their neighborhood is safe so they don't lock their doors. This is obviously an extremely bad thing if their neighborhood isnt safe though.

So thats probably the worst possible reaction to this policy-

People walking around their city thinking that they are safe but its really not safe and they don't take the precautions necessary to protect themselves and their loved ones.

Of course the most likely scenario is that they get a lot of criminals off the streets and prevent crimes that would otherwise happen which the media will simply say isn't happening because there is no alternative reality where those crimes were allowed to happen to compare to.

So the media will just say its not helping when it is helping no matter how much it's helping. So it's likely to help a lot of people but those same people will not believe its helping even though it is.

Those same people will scream and yell and demand that the government stop helping them because the media will make them believe it's not helping.

Trump doesn't care if they do that though. He just wants to help people it doesn't matter to him if people appreciate the help or not. He doesnt care if he gets credit for doing something as long as it helps people.
 
Last edited:
There is one demographic in this country that commits murder and mayhem at rates many times that of all other demographics.

There is a second demographic that encourages that murder and mayhem, that supports, funds and brings more of it into the country.

Separate from those demographics and you will have a nation at peace, with maximum liberty and with no need for authoritarian government measures.

Your choice.

 
Last edited:
There is one demographic in this country that commits murder and mayhem at rates many times that of all other demographics.

There is a second demographic that encourages that murder and mayhem, that supports, funds and brings more of it into the country.

Separate from those demographics and you will have a nation at peace, with maximum liberty and with no need for authoritarian government measures.

Your choice.



It should be pretty obvious prima facie that you are correct

Diversity causes strife - it always has and always will - and that strife will naturally result in government attempts to mediate the conflict

Less diversity, more peace, less government
 
There is one demographic in this country that commits murder and mayhem at rates many times that of all other demographics.

There is a second demographic that encourages that murder and mayhem, that supports, funds and brings more of it into the country.

Separate from those demographics and you will have a nation at peace, with maximum liberty and with no need for authoritarian government measures.

Your choice.


:rolleyes:

images


hq720.jpg
 
There is one demographic in this country that commits murder and mayhem at rates many times that of all other demographics.

There is a second demographic that encourages that murder and mayhem, that supports, funds and brings more of it into the country.

Separate from those demographics and you will have a nation at peace, with maximum liberty and with no need for authoritarian government measures.

Your choice.

You're forgetting the other demographic:

This nice lady in my liberty group who has good intentions but can't for the life of her come to understand or accept that central banking is a bad thing. She want "reforms". So every once in a while she texts me ideas that she has come up with, none of which make any sense. She thinks if the CB's go away the planet will go back to the stone age.

Another in my group truly believes that Trump needs a third term in office and that Alex Jones is going to see to it that Obama/Biden will get caught and jailed using green screen technology to make it look like Trump is doing those things. She insists AJ is going to succeed in time for the next election.

And then there are the ones who are looking forward to Vance 2028 who still don't like Ron Paul and Tom Massie because they are "kooks". And when I try to explain Stakeholder Capitalism he said he has no problems with it as long it isn't democrats who are doing it.

So now what?
 
You're forgetting the other demographic:

This nice lady in my liberty group who has good intentions but can't for the life of her come to understand or accept that central banking is a bad thing. She want "reforms". So every once in a while she texts me ideas that she has come up with, none of which make any sense. She thinks if the CB's go away the planet will go back to the stone age.

If we had separated from yet another demographic, would she still be brainwashed so?
 
If we had separated from yet another demographic, would she still be brainwashed so?

Well she's a dedicated republican. She hates anarchists [I have to identify as an Agorist so she'll at least converse with me]. If she had to choose between no central bank, and siding with democrats to retain it, what do you think?
 
Well she's a dedicated republican. She hates anarchists [I have to identify as an Agorist so she'll at least converse with me]. If she had to choose between no central bank, and siding with democrats to retain it, what do you think?

That applies to pretty much everybody in this country, including most of your immigrant friends who you say are more libertarian than I am

I would be very happy to get rid of the central bank however and yet I am an avowed fascist :up:
 
That applies to pretty much everybody in this country, including most of your immigrant friends who you say are more libertarian than I am

I would be very happy to get rid of the central bank however and yet I am an avowed fascist :up:

I've said this before during the '12 election. Had it not been for immigrants helping me, Ron Paul never would have won the congressional districts delegates that he did, which sent me to Tampa. It was the war veteran ball cap guys and the ladies with dyed-red-hair who put me through the GD wringer all in support of Romney. That's a fact. To this day they are in the good fight.
 
Last edited:
I've said this before during the '12 election. Had it not been for immigrants helping me, Ron Paul never would have won the congressional district delegates that he did, which sent me to Tampa. It was the war veteran ball caps guys and the ladies with dyed-red-hair who put me through the GD wringer all in support of Romney. That's a fact. To this day they are in the good fight.

The statistics don't at all line up with your experiences.

As an example, gun control. Coloreds are much more likely to support gun control laws

PP_2023.06.28_gun-violence_1-02.png
 
The statistics don't at all line up with your experiences.

As an example, gun control. Coloreds are much more likely to support gun control laws

Let me put it this way to you:

After all the support I got from the immigrants who helped during the Ron Paul revolution and who got me to Tampa, I'm not about to turn my back on them or kick them in the teeth, in favor of giving passes to those war vet ball cap wearers and ladies with dyed-red-hair who dis'd and hated on me and Ron Paul. Those immigrants are productive, have good businesses, and understand more than 'Merikan's what freedom truly means. See Post #9 for examples of the non-principled idiots.
 
Let me put it this way to you:

After all the support I got from the immigrants who helped during the Ron Paul revolution and who got me to Tampa, I'm not about to turn my back on them or kick them in the teeth, in favor of giving passes to those war vet ball cap wearers and ladies with dyed-red-hair who dis'd and hated on me and Ron Paul. Those immigrants are productive, have good businesses, and understand more than 'Merikan's what freedom truly means. See Post #9 for examples of the non-principled idiots.

If you want to blindly support an entire demographic because 12 people helped you do something 13 years ago,

that's fully your prerogative
 
If you want to blindly support an entire demographic because 12 people helped you do something 13 years ago,

that's fully your prerogative

I don't support or not support "entire demographics". I treat every individual as an individual and don't entertain "group thinking" like the lib-tards do.

It was far more than 12. 12 between 3 families perhaps, but this involved 3 large congressional districts. Granted there were whites, but there were a lot of immigrants who saw straight through the likes of Romney.
 
Back
Top