torchbearer
Lizard King
- Joined
- May 26, 2007
- Messages
- 38,926
...You just missed my point entirely.
your point is, you think there are better ways.
there may be, you should go do them.
...You just missed my point entirely.
Yup, Kokesh is gonna end up in jail. Hopefully he gets out before Rand becomes president. Probably not, though. Rand might have to pardon him.
Not necessarily my core point. What I was really trying to say was that this is a bad idea. A "nothing to gain, everything to lose" kind of deal.your point is, you think there are better ways.
there may be, you should go do them.
Not necessarily my core point. What I was really trying to say was that this is a bad idea. A "nothing to gain, everything to lose" kind of deal.
Oh, I should go do them? Right, because I guess it's totally unethical to point out something that I think is rather pointless and subject to disaster. How hypocritical!
First of all I must ask how you see Obama winning over Romney is a gain. Quit politics man...it gains in the same way obama winning over romney is a gain....
the people in louisiana will be agitated by a show of federal force against open carry protestors.
and i don't think this state is the only one.
this event will agitate. the pigs are playing their part as expected.
the pigs could neutralize kokesh by allowing him to march around without a fuss, or even act like- they don't even know what his problem is.. he can protest all he wants. then kokesh looks like a fool and the situation dies out.
that isn't happening is it.
you have no rights, only the privileges granted to you by a certain jurisdiction.
d.c. says you can't carry a firearm. therefore, you don't have the right.
that notion is false.
First of all I must ask how you see Obama winning over Romney is a gain. Quit politics man...
http://lewrockwell.com/orig13/matson-k1.1.1.htmlwhat did the conservative movement and republican congress do during Bush's 8 years?
Romney's win would neutralize most of the opposition we have to this bullshit right now. It would have been disastrous. Same policies. little opposition.
...And, miss my point all over again, why don't you? I already stated that if your goal is a political revolution, you may very well succeed in that regard. But in the long run, you won't be doing anything that hasn't been done a thousand times before. It's an age-old mistake, committed by loads of people missing the point.agitation builds opposition.
maybe you should read some history.
You're right. I shouldn't bother sharing information with people who are obviously resistant to it.i'm not even going to click on the link. either type what you want to say, or don't bother with a response.
You're right. I shouldn't bother sharing information with people who are obviously resistant to it.
...And, miss my point all over again, why don't you? I already stated that if your goal is a political revolution, you may very well succeed in that regard. But in the long run, you won't be doing anything that hasn't been done a thousand times before. It's an age-old mistake, committed by loads of people missing the point.
I suppose I can't talk about Lockean property rights, or reference his writings in any way, because then I wouldn't have "the mental capacity to make an argument myself." Right.i'm not clicking on a link, you can post text here. i assume you don't have the mental capacity to make an argument yourself, so you have to use someone else's argument.
that's fine. just post it here.
I suppose I can't talk about Lockean property rights, or reference his writings in any way, because then I wouldn't have "the mental capacity to make an argument myself." Right.
Apparently not, as when I attempted to share a link to an article with you on why you should quit politics, you immediately assumed that I didn't have a "mental capacity" for making coherent arguments (which I find rather ironic due to how you never really seem to respond to my posts in whole and/or miss the point entirely of what I'm trying to say, taking it in a whole different direction). All I have seen from you so far are bizarre, cryptic responses with the occasional ad hominem thrown in. I think here would be a good place to stop in an effort to prevent myself from sounding like a broken record attempting to try to get you to actually understand what it is I'm speaking about.you haven't done it yet. i'm a skeptic, but you producing your own ideas in debating my ideas are welcomed.