CNN reporter Dana Bash gets intellectually "Snowballed"

was this coordinated or spontaneous?

Regardless, she should just quit journalism if she really feels like she is in an arab-israel conflict with Ron Paul supporters.
 
This whole issue of her saying she's "worried" about Ron doing well is complete BULLSHIT. You clowns are not understanding what she said. Go back and look at the video. She said that John King was probably hearing these concerns from GOP party bosses, "Just like I am." You are making fools of us. PLEASE STOP.

I *have* looked at the video, several times.

And, I believe that *actions speak louder than words.*

I'm not judging Dana based solely on that one clip.

Her actions, and the actions of CNN, and the actions of the entire MSM has convicted them all.

Actions *do* speak louder than words.

The MSM is the enemy of the people of the US.
 
CNN and Bash's ilk just don't get it. We have proof (thanks to YouTube, etc) that the media whores have blacked Ron Paul out time and time again. And when they "might" be reporting (lose word) about Ron Paul, they are doing hit pieces on him or his supporters. Yet we are "blind?"




She's one of those "bobble heads." LOL
 
I *have* looked at the video, several times.

And, I believe that *actions speak louder than words.*

I'm not judging Dana based solely on that one clip.

Her actions, and the actions of CNN, and the actions of the entire MSM has convicted them all.

Actions *do* speak louder than words.

The MSM is the enemy of the people of the US.

*shakes head* Don't accuse her of saying things she did NOT SAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
For anyone who hasn't seen what most of these people are referring to:




guys, guys, guys...

she is not saying that she is worried about ron paul.

it was just a grammar slip. she is saying that she is sure that the anchor has talked to republicans that are are worried just like she is talking to republicans that are worried. not that she is also worried.

it was a slip up in the way that she spoke it. freudian? possibly, but a slip up nonetheless.
 
Yeah, she just made a poorly constructed sentence. It reminds me of the practice problems when I was preparing for the GMAT.
 
I've never heard her say "I'm sure you've talked to republicans who are worried, just like I have, that Mitt Romney will continue long into the...." And God knows they're out there. I'm one of them. Even if you take what she was trying to say it is BULL!!! RETALIATE!!
 
In that clip, whatever she said about being worried.. she still continued to say "nobody thinks, even if he does well here in New Hampshire, that he ultimately will be the nominee"

then later she asked him about some supposed Grandma to make him look like his inaccessible, she turned out to be working for McCain (ie Romney), but she never covered that angle, did she?

then days after that, she pointed out at his NH speech that he's using the same podium he had in Iowa to make him look cheap

then later that night, she implied all the Ron Paul supporters in NH after his speech were drunk

then earlier today, she submitted a piece about how Ron Paul isn't campaigning to win, and this is all really just to usher in his son Rand.

But she misspoke that first time, so it's all good.
 
Last edited:
I've never heard her say "I'm sure you've talked to republicans who are worried, just like I have, that Mitt Romney will continue long into the...." And God knows they're out there. I'm one of them. Even if you take what she was trying to say it is BULL!!! RETALIATE!!

Oh yeah - and that one time she asked Mitt Romney if he would run 3rd party.. oh wait.. that was Ron Paul too.. and she's asked it twice now..
 
guys, guys, guys...

she is not saying that she is worried about ron paul.

it was just a grammar slip. she is saying that she is sure that the anchor has talked to republicans that are are worried just like she is talking to republicans that are worried. not that she is also worried.

it was a slip up in the way that she spoke it. freudian? possibly, but a slip up nonetheless.

THANK YOU. A voice of reason.
 
There are plenty of legitimate reasons to criticize Bash, so why waste time on something that is NOT legit, and that makes us all look like fools and retards??
 
thanks Sal. I am so glad you have come here to tell us we are imagining what she is saying in the VERY CLIP we are watching.
And you post again and again that we don't understand her.

I just did a transcript:
--------------------------
But in terms of the long term, there is no question, I'm sure you've talked to Republicans who are worried as well, just like I am, that Ron Paul will continue on long into the spring and summer and even further, even if he runs as a Republican or as an Independent, he could really hurt whomever the Republican nominee is, because still, nobody thinks even if he does well in New Hampshire that he will ultimately be the nominee.
--------------------------

Yes, I understand that if you strangle the grammar textbook you can make her mean 'you're talking to people just as I am talking to people', but in doing so you're picking the harder reading, not the easy one. Furthermore, the entire sentence is pure propaganda that in and of itself is beyond the pale.
 
Last edited:
We are getting a lot better at psy-ops.

Long ways to go until the reporters 'just feel a strange urge' to say positve things about Dr Paul after drinking the tapwater though.
 
You are mis-hearing it. Stop this nonsense. It makes us all look like fools.

I'm not mis-hearing anything, Sal. I know exactly what she said.

Thanks, affa, for that transcription. Kinda shoots down the idea of a grammatical slip up IMO, since if Dana meant to reference having 'spoken with Republicans who are worried,' she would have said "just like I have" instead of "just like I am."

That one incident might not make the case, but when cumulative actions are reviewed, Bash is guilty.


In that clip, whatever she said about being worried.. she still continued to say "nobody thinks, even if he does well here in New Hampshire, that he ultimately will be the nominee"

then later she asked him about some supposed Grandma to make him look like his inaccessible, she turned out to be working for McCain (ie Romney), but she never covered that angle, did she?

then days after that, she pointed out at his NH speech that he's using the same podium he had in Iowa to make him look cheap

then later that night, she implied all the Ron Paul supporters in NH after his speech were drunk

then earlier today, she submitted a piece about how Ron Paul isn't campaigning to win, and this is all really just to usher in his son Rand.

But she misspoke that first time, so it's all good.
 
The piece she created out of the "junk" questions bit was overall positive to Paul.

The "as I am" bit is a simple misunderstanding by Paul supporters. She clearly meant "as I am talking to Republicans".

It's getting to be a bit childish now. But, that's Paul supporters for you.

What would Paul do?
 
She clearly meant "as I am talking to Republicans".

If it was as 'clear' as you seem to think it is, there wouldn't be an issue to begin with. I listened to it about 20 times to get that transcription exactly right, and i have to -force- myself to hear it the way you think is 'clear'. Because, to me, she clearly is saying she's worried.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top