CNN reporter Dana Bash gets intellectually "Snowballed"

I'm not mis-hearing anything, Sal. I know exactly what she said.

Thanks, affa, for that transcription. Kinda shoots down the idea of a grammatical slip up IMO, since if Dana meant to reference having 'spoken with Republicans who are worried,' she would have said "just like I have" instead of "just like I am."

yes, very good. you have just given an example of a grammatical slip up.

she said that's not what she meant. the appropriate response to her is "ok, but please be careful with the way you phrase things in the future." and then politely invite her to consider ron's message. no need for harsh words.
 
What "behavior?"

I don't recall anyone yelling at Dana in that video.

I don't have a problem with people speaking their mind to media personalities. In fact, I think it should happen a lot more often!

she was completely hounded and was getting visibly exasperated towards the end. she was actually extraordinarily polite in the way she handled the non-stop barrage of criticism.
 
It's getting to be a bit childish now. But, that's Paul supporters for you.

Your love affair with her is what is childish.

thanks Sal. I am so glad you have come here to tell us we are imagining what she is saying in the VERY CLIP we are watching.
And you post again and again that we don't understand her.

I just did a transcript:
--------------------------
But in terms of the long term, there is no question, I'm sure you've talked to Republicans who are worried as well, just like I am, that Ron Paul will continue on long into the spring and summer and even further, even if he runs as a Republican or as an Independent, he could really hurt whomever the Republican nominee is, because still, nobody thinks even if he does well in New Hampshire that he will ultimately be the nominee.
--------------------------

Yes, I understand that if you strangle the grammar textbook you can make her mean 'you're talking to people just as I am talking to people', but in doing so you're picking the harder reading, not the easy one. Furthermore, the entire sentence is pure propaganda that in and of itself is beyond the pale.
 
She's more blonde than fair. At least she's blonde on the surface of things. She doesn't even make pretentions about being objective...
 
she said that's not what she meant. the appropriate response to her is "ok, but please be careful with the way you phrase things in the future." and then politely invite her to consider ron's message. no need for harsh words.

If you believe that to be the appropriate response for you to make to Ms. Bash, then I wholeheartedly support you making that response to her.

For the record, I didn't see any "harsh words" from those who called her out for her blatantly biased reporting.


she was completely hounded and was getting visibly exasperated towards the end. she was actually extraordinarily polite in the way she handled the non-stop barrage of criticism.

I believe that those who chose to call Ms. Bash out have likely each been visibly exasperated with her for her exceedingly biased reporting - when they were watching said biased reporting in the 'privacy' of their own homes. Interesting that you show zero concern for their levels of exasperation, but are quick to rush in to support Ms. Bash.
 
Honestly, I see this as a Freudian slip. Rather than focusing on stupid media stuff like this, how about people point out the more unmistakable cases of media bias? Perhaps someone should take that "objective journalist" line and point out more obvious cases where Bash has clearly demonstrated the opposite.
 
Last edited:
if you didnt think that first woman was being fairly harsh,...well, i do. and not to mention the guy bringing up conspiracy garbage "i want to know who is behind cnn." these things make us look childish.
 
Back
Top