No coverage is bad coverage right?
Of these protests? We don't want Ron Paul associated with these protests. No coverage is best.
No coverage is bad coverage right?
Just watching CNN and the live reporter from the scene of one of the protests was asked if the protesters were supporting any particular party or candidate and said said many are libertarians and are supporting Ron. If any GOP primary voters were watching we just lost their vote. It was pretty bad, she actually made it sound like the majority of the protesters are Ron Paul supporting Libertarians.
so... Im wondering if our low poll numbers are being caused by lots of our supporters camped out in diffrent cities? Just an ideal thought and probably wrong.
so... Im wondering if our low poll numbers are being caused by lots of our supporters camped out in diffrent cities? Just an ideal thought and probably wrong.
You said the reporter in the title said MOST were, yet in this post you said the reporter said many were. Which is it? Were you there??
The media is now portraying us as storming a value voters summit and "stuffing" the ballot box. They'e trying to make us look like fanatics. If fox is able to start associating us with this too it's literally over for the campaign.
I think everyone on rpf is and has been pretty aware for weeks that there are RP people there, I think you're seriously missing the point of this thread, political ramifications.
Once you start playing the politics game you've already lost. This is a campaign of truth, honesty, and integrity, and trying to hide this portion of Ron Paul's support is none of those things.
Of these protests? We don't want Ron Paul associated with these protests. No coverage is best.
Unless you have multiple personalities on whose behalf you are speaking, you are not a "we" and you do not represent RPF.
Good question I don't actually remember what they said, I heard OWS, although at this point I don't think the average GOP voter would even notice the difference
OWS like the Anti-War Movement during the Bush Administration will be co-opted.
Co-opted to play up class warfare and anti-capitalism sentiments.
One need only look to whom is now attaching themselves to OWS.
Obama, Pelosi, & Reid have in the past few days voiced support for OWS and tapping into the "frustration".
Despite Goldman Sachs bankrolling 1/3 of Obama's re-election campaign. Plus, we add SEIU(Obama's union thug buddies), Moveon.org(pushing Obama's jobs bill and tax hike on the "rich"), 60's radical Francis Fox-Piven(whom has called for violence), self-proclaimed Communist and former Obama Green Jobs Czar Van Jones(whose call for violence in the "Top Down, Bottom Up, & Inside Out" to try and force a government crackdown destroying civil liberties under the guise of protection), Obama's spiritual adviser Jim Wallis(whom claims the Gospel of Christ is all about Redistribution of Wealth), plus others in the way of anarchy socialism ect.., plus a media that plays the narrative this Administration is pushing.
One has to forgive of being cynical if I think OWS is being, has been, or will be morphed into this.
Obama like Bush use these financial crisis(they and their friends in Washington helped or directly created) to justify abandonment of the free market and crony capitalism.
Yes, you may have some good people down their in the sense of what they are standing for in the way of true freedom, liberty, and honesty, but IMO that message will be or is being drowned out. And we know the Washington master's and how they can manipulate wordings or deceive based on dubious connotations.
So because they are trying to co-opt it, we should back off and let them do so?
Why are we incapable of making this blow up in their faces by taking over and turning the angry crowds against the people paying for it? If we stand around and do nothing it just turns into a big media narrative that pits Romney vs Obama and leaves us sitting around with nothing.