CEO of United Healthcare shot and killed in NYC

042d996977861f6aff28a68d7a0be7da.jpg

So with different camera's things can definitely look very different. Number 8 and 9 are liekly the same person. Same jacket, same fluffy hood. Number 7's hood looks to be a different material. The colour differences can generally be explained by camera types etc. However, the backpack on No 7 looks very light whereas the one shown in No 8 is most definitely very dark.

So I would say not all of these people are the same person, or at least without changing some clothing or accessories.
 
I'm wondering whether facial recognition is making this match and they are choosing to explain the change of clothes away later.

The face does look pretty similar, but it could be very incorrect.
 
I'm wondering whether facial recognition is making this match and they are choosing to explain the change of clothes away later.

The face does look pretty similar, but it could be very incorrect.

They probably just don't want to admit they have no leads.
 
Did Josh Shapiro just kill his chances in the 2028 Democratic primary?



‘He is no hero’: Pennsylvania governor rips people praising UnitedHealthcare CEO’s suspected killer
Josh Shapiro warned Americans not to let their ‘real frustration with our healthcare system’ lead them to ’dehumanize’ victim Brian Thompson

Io Dodds
10 December 2024


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MnPeYGq2pE


Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro has condemned those who praised the killer of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, insisting: "He is no hero."

At a press conference on Monday evening in Altoona, Pennsylvania, Shapiro addressed the "disturbing" number of Americans who had "looked to celebrate instead of condemning this killer."

...

"In America, we do not kill people in cold blood to resolve policy differences or express a viewpoint. I understand people have real frustration with our healthcare system, and I have worked to address that throughout my career.

"But I have no tolerance, nor should anyone, for one man using an illegal ghost gun to murder someone because he thinks his opinion matters most. In a civil society, we are all less safe when ideologues engage in vigilante justice.

“In some dark corners, this killer is being hailed as a hero. Hear me on this: he is no hero.”

...


read more:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...lvania-reaction-health-insuranc-b2661599.html
 
But I have no tolerance, nor should anyone, for one man using an illegal ghost gun to murder someone [...]

As opposed to what? Using a "legal", government-permitted gun to murder someone? (Or even just a knife ... or a rock ... or ...)

I'd be more impressed with (and more inclined to believe in the sincerity of) their "outrage" over the killer being called a "hero" if they didn't so liberally (ha-ha) pepper their declarations with such gratuitous qualifications. IOW: The "outrage" of Shapiro, et al. is at least as much of a cynical and opportunistic politicization of the murder as some peoples' use of the "the killer is a hero" thing is.
 
Luigi Mangione, who was arrested and charged with murder in the shooting death of United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson, once belonged to a group of Ivy League gamers who played assassins, a member of the group told NBC News.

In the game, called "Among Us," some players are secretly assigned to be killers in space who perform other tasks while trying to avoid suspicion from other players.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...e-slaying-played-video-game-killer-rcna183550


This guy was trained online in a leftist murder simulator "game" to not only commit the crime but to get away with it afterwards - to avoid being "sus."
 
My guess is the actual killer was a hired gun and all the clues he intentionally left behind are red herrings to make it look personal :up:
 
The insurance companies are not innocent or blameless.


In my opinion it's 100% the fault of government. "Blaming" the insurance companies makes it sound like you want the government to punish them as part of the solution. If you agree with me that 100% of the solution is to get government out of health care then we agree and are just arguing about semantics.
 
In my opinion it's 100% the fault of government. "Blaming" the insurance companies makes it sound like you want the government to punish them as part of the solution. If you agree with me that 100% of the solution is to get government out of health care then we agree and are just arguing about semantics.

Would you make the same defense of the role private companies play in the MIC?
 
I’d like to learn about United Healcares decade long journey of lobbying the US Government, in order to become the 9th largest revenue company in the World
 
Back
Top