It's not surprising Fiorina is in the front - she's the only aspiring politician I've ever heard say anything as strong against abortion.
This is the same Gravis poll that had Rand at 0.8% after the first debate, so this is a major improvement. Rand will be excited to learn he's more than doubled his support among the middle school demographic.
Sheep. They do what they're told.
The republican electorate is far more bandwagonish than they used to be it seems to me.
Fiorina wasn't as strongly anti-abortion-sounding back in 2010, when running for the U.S. Senate in blue California. She was clearly a 'three-exception' pro-lifer at the time, meaning she was okay with abortion for rape, incest and maternal endangerment.
It was exactly the same in 2012.
She said she was in favor of an exception for the health of the mother, which is essentially the same as saying that you're pro choice. "The health of the mother" can mean anything. It can mean that a woman can get an abortion because she has a headache, or because she's depressed. It's meaningless for someone to claim that they're pro life if they support an exception for the life of the mother.
What the fuck? Rand Paul 2%? and Jeb Bush is now 6? what a load of a fraud.
you can't be pro-life if you would let the mother die. if there are twins and both would die, that would be stupid. there are always exceptions. you have a right to kill someone who invades your home. no one will get elected with a no exception policy on abortion.
It was exactly the same in 2012.
Michelle Bachmann.Hey wasn't Glenn Beck cheering on Rick Santorum during that time? Hey wait, isn't Glenn Beck cheering on Fiorina now?