I've been saying
since before NH that if Paul does well delegate wise in most states and places highly (and takes one of) the following three states NY/CA/TX things work out. This is what I am still saying now. I like the looks of CA more as the race goes on

until that point the only thing that could do serious harm to Pauls tract to the Nomination is for supporters to buy into the MSM view that the straw poll is the one that counts. Placing first in the state in
delegates is
more of a win than first in the straw poll. Yes the straw poll would help us break more into the mainstream with some undecided, yes that could really be a boon to the effort... but why are Paul supporters
HERE treating the straw poll as if it counts outside of converting the less politically savvy?
Why is it so often that individuals here rank a state as "a win" or "a loss" based on the straw poll and without providing any context?
Santos three state "win" helped him, but since that "win" was made of pure straw poll he walked away with the attention and
Ron Paul walked away with the stronger claim to the Nomination.
Can we
please keep some perspective here? Straw Poll matter, but they matter
less than delegates. We don't have to be able to convince or explain that fact to those who aren't on board, in fact it's likely we won't be able too (hence
why straw polls help us) but for
us to give up or get bogged down
by the same misconception that the MSM is selling to them? Well that's just sad

(and I don't mean that with any sarcasm)
I dearly hope Liberty minded individuals are made of sterner stuff than to buckle under a media blackout... but only time will tell.