What is this talk?
I keep hearing it over and over and it still makes no sense.
The people vote. Delegates are assigned according how people voted.
Are we really deluding ourselves (again) that just because an assigned delegate is a RP supporter that they are going to go against what the people voted for, what, in some states they are required by law to do, and that the GOP machine is going to allow that to happen?
Here is how I understand it:
1. Not all states have their delegates matched via the vote.
2. Usually the states that don't are caucus states.
3. Caucus states normally require that people volunteer to become "lower level" delegates, who essentially vote each other to become higher level delegates, whom ultimately vote for the nominee.
4. Most americans do not know this, so if you don't look like your in first place, you don't get money or media coverage, even if you get all the delegates
5. At some point, you need money and media coverage to stay relevant.
6. The paul campaign is focusing on caucus states, because they realized if we ever had a chance at this, its through caucus states. For ron paul, who has a passionate base actually willing to stay after the vote, we can win the delegates for cheaper, and without winning the state. It doesn't mean we are gaming the system, it just means it is the strategy that could work for ron paul, given our limits. Obviously its no guarantee.
7. Normally campaigns ignore the delegate process, because most states assign people to become delegates if no one takes the slot. Usually the "state" selected delegates vote via the straw poll whether they have to or not.
8. Ron paul supporters are filling up the delegate slots in caucus states (mostly). We are able to do this because we are pretty much the only campaign in the last 40 years that would actually fair better with such a strategy, given our makeup and the Gop makeup. The other campaigns would have to spend much more money, and simply don't have that calibre of organization. Im not saying other campaigns aren't organized, only they don't have the kind you need to do what ron paul supporters are doing.
9. No one can win with just unbound delegates. There is no guarantee that you will get them until the convention, when votes are cast.
10. Because there are 4 candidates splitting the delegates, this convention might be contested.
11. If romney does not get 1144 delegates on the first vote, most all (if not all) of the delegates previously bound are set free, and vote for whom they want.
12. The ron paul campaign is making sure to have ron paul supporters contesting for delegate slots and in almost every state, even the states where delegates are bound.
13. If they campaign is not lying, and ground RUMOURS are true, we currently are second with delegates... Rommney will not get a majority when this is over. such estimates are projections.
14. if rumors are not true, rommney still probably won't get all the delegates, as long as santorum (and maybe gingrich) stay in the race.
The Lesson:
Don't pretend winning a state "straw poll" isn't important. It is the life blood of any campaign. Its not impossible to win without a state, but expect hell to freeze over if that happens.
Don't think we are already toast. We still have a LONG way to go before this is over. We can win this.
Don't think this is easy, or that the odds are an even 50-50. they are not. this is an up hill battle.
The paul campaign is using an unconventional strategy, so using past nominations as a template, is not necessarily going to give you an accurate reading of where we stand.
Becareful of what the campaign and others tell you. Sometimes "good news" is "lets-get-our-hopes-up". But don't assume its impossible either. It is very possible we have gotten most of the delegates out of the caucus states. It is very possible we are on Romney's heels. It is very possible we can make up that difference with unbound delegates on a second vote. It is also very possible this is all feel-good-bull-!@#$. This takes a bit of dialectic thinking.
If you give up now, we won't win. If you go about calling B.S. on the delegate counts we get from paul, and give up... would you forgive yourself at the slightest chance that it wasn't B.S, and that if supporters kept marching on we could have won?
Personlly I have decided to
A) not get my hopes up
B) NOT GIVE UP.
C) Identify that if there is a chance, or a path for ron paul I think we owe it to him to see it through, rain or shine.
This is all just my understanding. and when i say "you" I am making a general statement toward the reader, not specifically the person i quoted. lol.