BREAKING NEWS: ronpaul.com Domain Name Battle update

[PatriotOne]

Hat tip to Torchbearer.

Turns out that a person by the name of Martha Roberts is the registrant on ronpaul.org domain name (who also owns ronpaul.com through another dummy corp in Panama). Email address: [email protected].

http://www.domainwhoisinfo.com/ronpaul.org

Who is DN Capital?

http://dn-capital.com/

DN Capital Inc. is located in Panama City in the Republic of Panama.

Established in 2005, the company specializes in domain name acquisition, management, brokerage and recovery services, website design and administration, graphic design, as well as content creation.

This information was revealed when the privacy shield was lifted due to the complaint that was filed by Ron's lawyers.

 

[angelatc]

Eh, I still don't care. Ron Paul abandoned his trademark intentionally to further his political career. He shouldn't be allowed to come back and claim it now.

 

[qh4dotcom]

There are two Panamanian phone numbers...one on the WHOIS and another one on the DN Capital site contact link.

 

[newbitech]

like it matters. They offered the control of the .org for free!

 

[PatriotOne]

So you are still standing up for cybersquatters who have been lying their asses off instead of Ron Paul?

 

[ronpaulfollower999]

And there we go. Wow.

 

[Chester Copperpot]

SO I assume the ronpaul.com people arent supporters after all?

 

[MelissaWV]

...
Who is DN Capital?

http://dn-capital.com/

DN Capital Inc. is located in Panama City in the Republic of Panama.

Established in 2005, the company specializes in domain name acquisition, management, brokerage and recovery services, website design and administration, graphic design, as well as content creation.

This information was revealed when the privacy shield was lifted due to the complaint that was filed by Ron's lawyers.

See what I did here?:

Established in 2005, the company specializes in domain name acquisition, management, brokerage and recovery services, website design and administration, graphic design, as well as content creation.

 

[torchbearer]

they also own bobbarr.com
discussed in another thread. got the links there.
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...-things-about-that-RonPaul-com-domain-dispute…

 

[Pericles]

SO I assume the ronpaul.com people arent supporters after all?

Same registrant of ronpaul.com also has bobbarr.com so they must be libertarians

 

[angelatc]

Same registrant of ronpaul.com also has bobbarr.com so they must be libertarians

In the cases that lost, this is what a web site looks like when they lose the domain: http://bobbarr.com/

 

[PatriotOne]

See what I did here?:

They ought to stick to cybersquatting. I could have done a better job designing the website. It looks pretty amateurish.

 

[angelatc]

So you are still standing up for cybersquatters who have been lying their asses off instead of Ron Paul?

They haven't lied about anything. I still think it's a fan running the site.

 

[angelatc]

They ought to stick to cybersquatting. I could have done a better job designing the website. It looks pretty amateurish.

So, which is it? They're highly skilled con men, or is it an amateur fan site that looks like it's designed by amateurs ?

 

[Pericles]

In the cases that lost, this is what a web site looks like when they lose the domain: http://bobbarr.com/

I invite your attention to point number ii

From the ICANN policy

[SIZE=-1]b. Evidence of Registration and Use in Bad Faith. For the purposes of Paragraph 4(a)(iii), the following circumstances, in particular but without limitation, if found by the Panel to be present, shall be evidence of the registration and use of a domain name in bad faith:
(i) circumstances indicating that you have registered or you have acquired the domain name primarily for the purpose of selling, renting, or otherwise transferring the domain name registration to the complainant who is the owner of the trademark or service mark or to a competitor of that complainant, for valuable consideration in excess of your documented out-of-pocket costs directly related to the domain name; or
(ii) you have registered the domain name in order to prevent the owner of the trademark or service mark from reflecting the mark in a corresponding domain name, provided that you have engaged in a pattern of such conduct; or
(iii) you have registered the domain name primarily for the purpose of disrupting the business of a competitor; or
(iv) by using the domain name, you have intentionally attempted to attract, for commercial gain, Internet users to your web site or other on-line location, by creating a likelihood of confusion with the complainant's mark as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of your web site or location or of a product or service on your web site or location.[/SIZE]

 

[newbitech]

So you are still standing up for cybersquatters who have been lying their asses off instead of Ron Paul?

out of curiosity, can you find me another case of cyber-squatting where the squatters have squatted for 5 years? What lie? And no I am standing up for the truth of the matter.

 

[PatriotOne]

They haven't lied about anything. I still think it's a fan running the site.

Which one? Timothy? GeorgeR? Martha Roberts? Or whoever the owner of dummy JNR Corp/Panama is?

 

[newbitech]

Same registrant of ronpaul.com also has bobbarr.com so they must be libertarians

and express free market capitalism and individual privacy. What's the real issue here folks?

 

[Pericles]

out of curiosity, can you find me another case of cyber-squatting where the squatters have squatted for 5 years? What lie? And no I am standing up for the truth of the matter.

www.americanairlines.com

 

[PatriotOne]

So, which is it? They're highly skilled con men, or is it an amateur fan site that looks like it's designed by amateurs ?

Neither. It looks like an amateur fan site run by amateur cons.