Boston.com says 160 RP voters in Sutton

[VRP08]

what list is this?! Pon Paul WON going by that!

 

[Feelgood]

In fact, just scrolling through the list, looks like Ron Paul did pretty damn good....

Somebody get a screen shot of this or at least save it to hard disk!

Done. But why?

 

[Highstreet]

In fact, just scrolling through the list, looks like Ron Paul did pretty damn good....

Somebody get a screen shot of this or at least save it to hard disk!

The columns are off.

Huck Paul and Romney are all shifted to the right one.

Huck got 160.

Paul got 0 in Sutton.

 

[sb10]

In another thread some people from Sutton claim they voted for Ron Paul but the votes weren't tallied. As for this graphic it just looks plain wrong.

 

[Ron2Win]

Digg, even if false, we deserve to add scrutiny to the system

 

[luckypunk]

what list is this?! Pon Paul WON going by that!

Interesting way to fraud...just change the names!

It would be a colossal SStorm if affidavits come back matching MCCains totals

 

[NoPants]

We did win Richmond. That makes RP and Romney the only two candidates to win counties in both Iowa and NH. That's a nice statistic, I guess...

 

[WeWillWin08]

Those 160 Votes are in the McCain Column. Just look at
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/nh/nh_primary_gop_results_by_town/

 

[limequat]

That data is weird. If you copy it into excel you see the "hidden" column that throws everything off. I think it's supposed to represent Alan Keyes. Why hide Keyes' results?

 

[tttar]

That data is weird. If you copy it into excel you see the "hidden" column that throws everything off. I think it's supposed to represent Alan Keyes. Why hide Keyes' results?

Yeah, just copy the whole thing into a spreadsheet (where a hidden column appears at the far right), and below their totals, make your own totals, like =SUM(D6242) across the whole row.

Shift all the names to the right, starting with McCain, and put Keyes' name in the blank where McCain's was.

Then it adds up. Too bad.

 

[pilby]

That data is weird. If you copy it into excel you see the "hidden" column that throws everything off.

correct. i just did it. column 3 (of the candidates) totals to 206 votes. but the heading for that column as well as the total at the bottom are left out, meaning that that column headings and totals after that are left off.

 

[breakranks]

correct. i just did it. column 3 (of the candidates) totals to 206 votes. but the heading for that column as well as the total at the bottom are left out, meaning that that column headings and totals after that are left off.

Not to be too far outside the box, but how do we know for sure that the
column headings are off? Why are we assuming this?

 

[tttar]

correct. i just did it. column 3 (of the candidates) totals to 206 votes. but the heading for that column as well as the total at the bottom are left out, meaning that that column headings and totals after that are left off.

I wish your "REAL TOTAL" for Ron Paul was correct, but that will have to happen in the next primary.

 

[pilby]

Not to be too far outside the box, but how do we know for sure that the
column headings are off? Why are we assuming this?

good point, i guess. how about this: the column headings are off from other sites reporting. the results do match with other sites reporting if you shift the column headings.

i gotta tell ya, though. i'm always a skeptic when people start yelling "conspiracy" but there are quite a few strangities with tonight's results (numerous people saying they voted Paul in Sutton, but official results say 0? Giuliani getting 9.11% in 3 counties!!???! were the hired programmers purposely sending a msg?)

 

[FreestarMediaDotCom]

The column labels must be misaligned with columns of numbers. If not this is a story AS BIG AS WATERGATE.

 

[jupiter]

The column labels must be misaligned with columns of numbers. If not this is a story AS BIG AS WATERGATE.

Uhh...everything this idiot we have for a president has done (and his vp) exceeds watergate by a huge margin.

 

[Electric Church]

//