I don't think those are accurate, as much as I want them to be. Look through the entire list.... if those were accurate, Ron Paul came in first by a wide margin! I think it's mis-labeled, sadly![]()
No, that's an error. McCain had 160, not us...although we probably had some of his 160...and some from others too...
I put a digg up of the CSPAN Video from Earlier, PLEASE DIGG IT, LETS GET THE MESSAGE OUT,
http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Caller_Claims_Voter_Fraud_in_N_H_on_CSPAN
I put a digg up of the CSPAN Video from Earlier, PLEASE DIGG IT, LETS GET THE MESSAGE OUT,
http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Caller_Claims_Voter_Fraud_in_N_H_on_CSPAN
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/nh/nh_primary_gop_results_by_town/
Scroll down, and they have 160 votes for Ron Paul listed as coming from Sutton...
The data is correct, the columns are just misaligned.
I strongly doubt that. fubar
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/nh/nh_primary_gop_results_by_town/
Scroll down, and they have 160 votes for Ron Paul listed as coming from Sutton...
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/nh/nh_primary_gop_results_by_town/
Scroll down, and they have 160 votes for Ron Paul listed as coming from Sutton...