Bold Prediction: Sarah Palin Will Endorse Ron Paul on Sept 3rd

Yeah, highly doubt it. It would hard to retract all the things I said about her. But I'd do it. Oh yeah, and some pooping would certainly be in order.
 
I know, I know...a lot of people are going to say "are you crazy?" Or "she will not put herself out there like that!" But this would be MAJOR news to me. I do not see her endorsing any other candidates, truthfully. She cannot sit there and say she is against the status quo, then say she supports Rick Perry or Mitt Romney for President. That wouldn't make too much sense. Also, as we all know...there is a feud between Bachmann and Palin. So that won't happen. We all must understand, shes a businesswoman now...and SOMETIMES, you have to take risks. But if you really look at the poll numbers, Ron isn't THAT much of a risk. His numbers have steadily increased, while others have decrease. The only reason Gov. Perry is so high is because he is fresh. Look at Cain, that could happen to Perry once he is vetted a little more (just not as severely). If Sarah Palin just plays it safe all the time, her image/brand would lose its thunder. Everyone, including Palin, needs to take risks or do spontaneous things (like the Bus Tour) and make things interesting. Can you honestly sit there and say that for her to sit and wait for a clear frontrunner, then come out and support them, keeps her interesting? No, it doesn't. It makes her predictable. Moreover, what does she have to lose by endorsing Ron? Say Ron doesn't win (which I think he will), she can then just get behind the GOP nominee anyway. No harm, no foul. Now, when Sept 3rd comes, I could be made to look like a fool, but ya know what? Who cares!? Again, Palin's MAJOR announcement in Iowa will go something like this, "I am endorsing Congressman Ron Paul for President of the United States of America."


Right guys...right? Amiright? Amiright?

We are 3 days away from finding out the answer is an obvious NO. And that this is a useless thread.
 
Ron Paul is noticeably absent from http://sarahpac.com/candidates

Rand is listed but not Ron. Just adds more weight as to why she would not do this. I think she was going to endorse someone else at the event and the candidate (probably Perry) thought it would do more harm than good.
 
Last edited:
This woman is a Flustercuck of confusion.

It might not have been her choice. I am guessing she was probably going to endorse and be a cheerleader for Perry or someone but the endorsement was rejected or strategically postponed since he is running high right now. They will wait for her endorsement when or if his numbers start dropping to prop them back up again.
 
If Obama gets his joint session of congress the day after Ron Paul wipes the floor with Rick Perry in the debate, his flavor of the month poll premium might not take as hard a hit as otherwise. The media would go back to the old jobs jobs jobs gibberish and give Perry back his only leg to stand on.
 
Impossible. Palin is beholden to the military-industrial complex and is pro-war like everyone but Paul. She will do no such thing.
 
@ Join the Paul Side

If this was such a "useless thread", why comment on it? Get your "useless" negativity out of here...
"
 
Someone at cnn said that palin wont announce if shes running or not. If so, that means she wont endorse anyone.
 
She's probably going to announce that she's running... she gave up her job as governor for this moment, ffs lol. She's not going to just give up -- she's going to run...

EDIT: Okay, maybe that was a bad opinion on my part -- didn't fully read the topic nor the headlines... I dunno'. I just don't see her endorsing Ron.
 
Last edited:
I know this may not be credible but CNN said that she will be King making the Tea Party but will not be endorsing any of the candidates by name.
 
"There's room for more" in the Republican field - Sarah Palin in Des Moines yesterday
 
Back
Top