I wouldn't think Bloomberg is credible. I'm not saying they are known to be wrong or anything, but I just don't think they are known to be right either. But if another poll from a different firm says the same thing, I will believe it!
I wouldn't think Bloomberg is credible. I'm not saying they are known to be wrong or anything, but I just don't think they are known to be right either. But if another poll from a different firm says the same thing, I will believe it!
There’s good news in the poll for Paul, 76, a Texas congressman who has attracted ardent supporters. Among likely caucus-goers who say their minds are made up, Paul leads with 32 percent, followed by Romney at 25 percent and Gingrich, a former House speaker, at 17 percent.
Among Paul supporters who backed him in the 2008 caucuses, 69 percent are still with him now.
Poll participant Sarah Stang, 78, a retired teacher who lives in Osage, Iowa, said she switched parties four years ago so she could vote for Paul.
“He doesn’t want to raise taxes on us middle- and low- income people,” she said, adding that she “loves” his challenges to the Federal Reserve. “They have way too much power. They should let the marketplace do what it’s supposed to,” she said.
How about if it was from the highly credible Des Moines Register? Their Iowa polls are highly regarded. Same pollster.
This needs to be spread far and wide. If this doesn't recharge grassroots enthusiasm, I don't know what will.
This.
The psychological effects of this poll on voters (especially iowans) could be huge. One of the biggest hurdles we've faced is trying to bridge the chasm without any 'social proof' that Paul could actually win. People like us, who are 'early adopters' / 'mavens' can make the mental leap with ease... but most others can't.
Very few people like to openly back the guy with 'no shot in hell'.... but lots like to back the 'underdog' ... and this Poll definitely opens up that narrative![]()
We need people making youtube videos of themselves phone banking ASAP. This will encourage others when they see how easy it is to do.Phone From Home will boost these numbers a lot. We have 1.5 months to make this happen. We need to come up with a way to advertise Phone From Home to more supporters. The more people doing it, the higher we'll surge in the polls.
a good pick me up for those have doubts about Ron's chances:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-...ay-republican-dead-heat-in-iowa-caucuses.html
One thing that stood out in the article:
Where did the other 31% go?!?
We need people making youtube videos of themselves phone banking ASAP. This will encourage others when they see how easy it is to do.
Is there any proof that this isn't an online poll? I don't see any.![]()
The Bloomberg Iowa poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.4 percentage points and was taken Nov. 10-12. Selzer & Co. is the same West Des Moines-based firm that conducts the Iowa Poll for the Des Moines Register newspaper.
Given this quote
I'd say it was probably not online. Excellent news.Also promising that more people in the state report hearing from the Paul campaign then any of the other candidates. That's the sort of stuff that wins elections, especially in a state like Iowa.
I'd like to see another poll confirm this, especially PPP. Is Bloomberg an accurate pollster?