'Black Lives Matter' Organizer Outed as White?

JK/SEA said:
you either drink too much flouride, or you have mad cow disease, or both...

whoever you are, you are an embarassment to the human race....

geez...what a freaking moron.
Click to expand...

that's how you win an argument? calling somebody a moron?
 
PRB said:
It just did.

It shows that a person's ancestry has either absolute zero, or practically and negligibly zero common ancestry with people living in Africa today. If any, it'd be dozens of generations that the traits are no longer identifiable.
Click to expand...

I don't believe that. Source?
 
there was stability in Africa,, before the Europeans invaded and raped it. Before artificial borders were established.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I'm sure it was all just like in Coming to America.
They were all princes living the high life then evil YT came along and ruined it for everybody. :rolleyes:
The truth is Africa has always been an unstable disaster.
Charles Darwin wrote detailed descriptions of the savagery he witnessed when visiting there.
Canabalism. Voodoo. And of course nothing has changed to this day.
The only bright spot for that train-wreck was during colonialism.
Which gave Africans access to clean water, food, and modern medicine.
This was Africas "golden age." A time of relative peace and prosperity.
And as a testament to just how good things were, many Africans today are openly calling for a return to colonialism.
 
Last edited:
erowe1 said:
Take those three skulls in the picture above. A person with a skull matching the shape of any one of those three could be born anywhere on the planet and have ancestors who were born anywhere on the planet. There may be a greater likelihood that they or some of their ancestors were born in one place versus another. But the possibility will always remain that that likelihood will not match reality.
Click to expand...
This is just false. If you have a skull shaped like this, you have African ancestry:
variants_large_3563.jpg
 
PRB said:
it tells you a person's ancestry comes from different parts of Europe, but not Asia or Africa or the new World
Click to expand...

I highly doubt that. Is there a written explanation that goes with it?
 
erowe1 said:
And people who don't have the same DNA. There is not a gene that is unique to people living in Africa.
Click to expand...

Actually there is, several. Or else how would they have noticeably different skin color as Europeans and east Asians.
 
DFF said:
You're correct. But what you (conveniently) failed to mention is that the slave-owners are not White, they're black.
African tribes enslaving other African tribes.
However I'm sure this type of oppression is perfectly acceptable since there's no White guilt angle for your kind to try and exploit.
Click to expand...

Crap, just back for the last time and I am out for good.

I can't believe you actually thought that was a serious post.

I am just going to explain it to you and this time I am very serious. The numbers given by the western NGO groups estimate are so wrong that nobody living in these places were they get their numbers believe it. They count as slaves indentured servants which is silly. Take for example, I send 20k to a couple with more kids that they can take care off. They cannot pay this money back and instead decided to give one of their children as a domestic servant to work for me. Some people without a brain would regard this as contract as "x tribe coming in and stealing child as slave" when it is nothing more than an economic exchange to work. Btw, its not just a mere exchange cos as part of the deal usually stipulates visits either from the servant or the parents/relatives, also that the servant would start apprentice in a trade or go to school.

This is a custom that I don't expect anyone living in the west to understand, they see it and immediately start raising money to buy the child back to parent who originally cannot afford to take care of the child. They do that removing the child from a home where he/she is eating 3 square meals, going to school and/or learning a trade. Sorry but that arrangement is not slavery and I will never consider it as one

Also child labor in the places where I know about are so cheap that it would actually be cost prohibitive to try and acquire labor via slavery. It is much easier and more common to use indentured servants as house helps, child care providers etc than to try and hunt you a slave. One of the girls who lived with us when we were growing up is still working for my parents today, my parents paid for her schooling and she is now managing one of my parent's businesses.

If you are to believe anything I tell you about Africa, it is that the numbers the NGOs give out about the numbers of slaves in Africa are wrong by a very wide margin. I am sure you can find some small tribe in some small remote war ravaged community still practicing some form of tribal war then slavery, but this popular idea painted by the NGOs of tribes fighting and taking slaves is for the most part a myth. It is far much easier to buy it than try to take it by force.
 
erowe1 said:
And people who don't have the same DNA. There is not a gene that is unique to people living in Africa.
Click to expand...
Your arguments are utterly incoherent. There are genetic differences between the races. Modern genetic tests can tell where someone's ancestry comes from very accurately.

This is you: "Race is a social construct, but there are biological differences, but biologists say there aren't biological differences, but anyone from anywhere with any ancestry can have the biological differences, but DNA can't tell where someone's ancestry comes from, even though it can."

It's like a pathetic clown act.
 
tod evans said:
Can "Hillbilly" be a race?

How about subspecies? Ozark, Blue Ridge, Appalachian, etc.....

I want a pedigree!

What about stud service? Will I get kicked out of the Hillbilly registry if I breed city mongrels?

It's all so damn confusing trying to be special..........
Click to expand...

LOL.

We gotta have a beer sometime.

I would bet that most of these folks can't trace their family lines back 300 years.. let alone know who was fucking who 2000 years ago.

I can trace the French lines back the farthest. but that is still only a few hundred years.
 
ThePaleoLibertarian said:
Pretty close. Even a paternity test isn't 100% accurate.


If that's true, it must be bad methodology.
Click to expand...

I just fucking love it when creationists deny DNA is a good measure for ancestry in support of humans being related to apes, then liberals who want to use common ancestry to argue all humans are one. But then come the paternity tests, destroys both arguments.

You can cherry pick both similarities and differences to emphasize in your argument, can't you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

jmdrake
White man shoots black disabled veteran after phony "stolen valor" claim turns violent.
Replies
0
Views
101
jmdrake
jmdrake
Swordsmyth
Disproportionate Black Crime Rates in America Exposed
Replies
16
Views
174
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
jmdrake
Black lesbian couple in Virginia allegedly chased by white locals with guns until they crashed with severe injuries
3 4 5
Replies
95
Views
1K
jmdrake
jmdrake
PAF
Netanyahu To Visit White House for 4th Time
2
Replies
20
Views
515
unknown
unknown
jmdrake
Charlie Kirk getting destroyed in debates
2 3 4
Replies
65
Views
2K
Invisible Man
I
Back
Top