Bin Laden Killed? Who's buying it?

Which is it?


  • Total voters
    264
He said he was hidden by Pakistan for 10 years. 2001 + 10 =2011.

Please, listen.

You are becoming a broken record. So I will cut and paste my response to another poster.


Read any decent book on debate and it will tell you to concede points that you are unlikely to be able to persuade your audience to accept in order to preserve your credibility. Just because Ron Paul is apparently smart enough to know that doesn't make him a liar. He said on the Dianne Rheems show that he needed more information and he had questions about the DNA. Why do you not believe him?
 
I still have no idea what to believe. I can't help but be skeptical of the claim that he was alive in 2011, until i see some actual proof. The man has been on Kidney dialysis for over a decade...

ehow.com said:
The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases reports the dialysis survival rate at close to 80 percent through one year, 64 percent through two years, 33 percent after five years and 10 percent through 10 years.
http://www.ehow.com/about_5507068_long-people-live-kidney-dialysis.html#ixzz1LPrKrlDb
 
Ron is on Cavuto right now talking about the details of the assault. He even compared it to the Saddam capture, and said "it wasn't much of a firefight".

"Just because Ron Paul is apparently smart enough to know that doesn't make him a liar."
No. If he is saying he believes Osama was killed in Pakistan, and he does not believe that, he is a liar. Because he would be telling a lie.
 
So, he's lying?

No, he's playing the game-go along to get along. Congress isn't known for being an honest organization, you know. RP, like all elected folks, makes calculations and acts on them. This is not to say that RP is evil, just that he's playing the game-picking his battles carefully, as it were.
 
No, he's playing the game-go along to get along. Congress isn't known for being an honest organization, you know. RP, like all elected folks, makes calculations and acts on them. This is not to say that RP is evil, just that he's playing the game-picking his battles carefully, as it were.

I've given you hard proof of Ron's thoughts on this. You're just giving conjecture. You're assuming ron is playing word games, or political games, and that his statements cannot be trusted. Again, with no evidence.
Ron's consistency is legendary, when have you known him to say one thing for a while and then come out later and admit he was just saying that to get by?
 
I don't know that he "believes" that. He has said that it raises more questions than it answers. But he is taking it on face value as it supports his position that the wars were unnecessary, and that foreign policy is flawed.
I agree with him there.

This^^
 
I did not vote in the poll.

Who could vote unless they knew the truth? I sure do not.

After reading the posts concerning Bin Laden over the last 24 hours, I am going to make a prediction.

Bin Laden conspiracy theorists are going to cost Ron Paul the presidency. That is my prediction.

Truth often carries high prices.

I don't know or care if he is dead now or died in 2001 or died in 2003 or died in 2007. It really makes no difference to the issue of needing to end these horrendous wars.

In an sense I agree, but overall this position is short-sighted. When he died and the exact nature of his position in this scheme of war and politics are issues that should be central to at least parts of our opinions on how the political world stage is being played. I will grant that even if everything "they" have claimed were true, the justifications for going to war are thin to none at best. But that is not enough, or ought not be. If "we" are those whom "they" serve, and this is still ostensibly the case, then "we" should be intensely interested in the truth of all these political events if for no other reason than "they" are engaging in mass murder and economic, as well as political pillage on an unprecedented scale. "They" are doing it in your name. This at least partly the reason that people have flown planes into our office buildings and we now have TSA sticking their thingies up our backsides at the airport.

Do not for a moment believe that we are just the innocent victims of the evil ones. We are that only in part. That we are victims at all is partly due to our lazy and blind acceptance of "their" actions, carried out officially in "our" names. We all need to think about that. We have the blood of millions upon our hands because we pretty well know that what "they" are doing is fucked, yet we have taken no decisive action to stop them. They represent us and we accept it if through no other mechanism than willful default. That places at least some onus upon our shoulders. But what is far and away more practically significant it that the onus rests entirely with us in the minds of a determined enemy. So forget the moral/philosophical argument if you must and focus on the practical side. Your thoughts form your reality. If one believes Americans are the devil's minions, then that is what they are and one will act accordingly and we will have to defend ourselves against them.

This is not to say the blame is 100% ours. It certainly is not, but we do hold a stiff proportion of it.


Our focus should be on bring the troops home from all these needless wars, not bickering over non-issues.

Devil is in the details. So long as the people sufficiently buy the terrorist fairy tale, there will be sufficient power to keep the troops where they are, all else equal. Proving that Bin Laden had been dead for years prior would open a great can of worms with which "they" would have to then deal, so do not be so rash in dismissing the significance of this little turn of history. Granted, it is not terribly likely that the truth will ever be made clear. It may well be that they just got lucky and offed the bastard. It may not. We do not know what to believe because "they" have been caught in lie after lie, and as the old saying goes, "fool me once, shame on you..." and so on. Not just that, but "they" have done an incalculably poor PR job, if we are to grant they are telling the truth in general. It is difficult to believe that so many people - persons basically running the world as the official story goes - are so fathomlessly inept and stupid as to have proceeded as they have over the past several decades with respect to countless bungled political dealings. Recall Gulf War version 1.0? What would possess anyone to stop short of locating Hussein and permanently removing him as a threat, assuming he indeed was that?

Either these people are dumber than donuts or they are up to something that is not being published.

Trying to spread this idea that the official story is not true is not a smart idea.

From a standpoint of pure pragmatism, you may be right. But if we become pure pragmatists, then we are no different than the progressive/liberal vermin who'd sell their own sisters into prostitution and screw their own daddies if it got them what they wanted. I'd rather lose than stoop to that level of existence.

Even if they lied through their teeth, it really does not matter at this point.

Once again, this is painfully misguided thinking. It matters for any of a number of reasons, not the least of which being the inuring of the public to the lies told them. This is perhaps the most dangerous aspect of it. As the callouses build, the lies become less onerous and more acceptable until one day they become accepted truth and people stop caring enough to want to discern truth from lie. If the significance of this escapes you, then I would submit they have already succeeded wildly in your case. The question of veracity is one of the most important and we should be on "them" like stink on rice, and when the great lies are uncovered, those having told them and those having charged them will telling the lies should be locked into small boxes for the rest of their lives. The damage this does to every one of us - to YOU - so very directly, cannot be overstated. Killing you outright would be a lesser crime.

We can sort through the rest of the lies and political garbage that our government tries to give us later after Ron Paul is elected.

And if he is not elected, then what? I pray he makes it, but let us face it that as things stand this very hour, he is not a likely victor. Let us all hope that changes by election day.

Trying to spread that stuff now or during the campaign will only hurt our cause.

If done in the wrong way, you may be right, but also bear in mind that the enemies of liberty know this as well. They will doubtlessly have their provocateurs on task to broadcast and propagate the conspiracy-loon image no matter what the rest of us do. No doubt the media will, if so bid by their masters, take up the cause of assassination to eliminate the Ron Paul hazard.

Your position in this is similar to bailing a rowboat with a thimble in the midst of a hurricane. The deck is very much stacked against us as it is. Broaching the subject in a rational manner is not likely to change the game either way - though a breakthrough in the truth, in fact, might alter the game completely, so I say keep at it.
 
Last edited:
Why does it even matter what Ron says? This is a forensic issue, not a philosophical issue. Ron is speculating based on the same information we've all heard. Without more evidence, none of us can really claim to know very much about what went down.
 
Why does it even matter what Ron says? This is a forensic issue, not a philosophical issue. Ron is speculating based on the same information we've all heard. Without more evidence, none of us can really claim to know very much about what went down.

"You have given out too much Reputation in the last 24 hours, try again later."
IOU 1 +rep, Clay.
 
I've given you hard proof of Ron's thoughts on this. You're just giving conjecture. You're assuming ron is playing word games, or political games, and that his statements cannot be trusted. Again, with no evidence.
Ron's consistency is legendary, when have you known him to say one thing for a while and then come out later and admit he was just saying that to get by?

It doesn't matter what you say or what evidence you provide. The Alex Jones army will not be denied another conspiracy no matter what the facts are. There needs to be a constant effort by people with commen sense to let people know these folks don't represent Ron's point of view and we don't have to waste valuable debate minutes answering 911 or now bin laden conspiracy questions. You won't change their mind ever but you can let normal republican primary voters know the truth.
 
Last edited:
The poll is at 3 to 1 folks ain't buyin' it.
I suspect that nationwide it is about 3/4 of folks ain't buyin' it. (75% I heard somewhere)

People are expecting lies anymore.
Normal people don't believe the Government Bullshit. Idiots do, Shills do.
Not the public.
We just need to give the disgusted, disillusioned, and the disregarded majority a reason to go vote.
 
I've given you hard proof of Ron's thoughts on this. You're just giving conjecture. You're assuming ron is playing word games, or political games, and that his statements cannot be trusted. Again, with no evidence.
Ron's consistency is legendary, when have you known him to say one thing for a while and then come out later and admit he was just saying that to get by?

RP deals with sensitive issues indirectly. Take the issue of Israel. Instead of talking about various crime committed by the Israeli regime, he talks about foreign policy. He also skirts 9/11 truth by addressing it indirectly (AFAIK). I have to give ron credit for knowing his audience, though.
 
It doesn't matter what you say or what evidence you provide. The Alex Jones army will not be denied another conspiracy no matter what the facts are. There needs to be a constant effort by people with commen sense to let people know these folks don't represent Ron's point of view and we don't have to waste valuable debate minutes answering 911 or now bin laden conspiracy questions. You won't change their mind ever but you can let normal republican primary voters know the truth.

Proof, verified by an uninterested 3rd party would convince me (I'm not an Alex Jones-er, btw). The US regime has plenty to gain by lying, and you know it. Considering that the government lies about even petty things, you would be incredibly naive NOT to question the "official" story.
 
Last edited:
It doesn't matter what you say or what evidence you provide. The Alex Jones army will not be denied another conspiracy no matter what the facts are. There needs to be a constant effort by people with commen sense to let people know these folks don't represent Ron's point of view and we don't have to waste valuable debate minutes answering 911 or now bin laden conspiracy questions. You won't change their mind ever but you can let normal republican primary voters know the truth.

LOL. Lot's of people who are questioning what happened to Osama Bin Laden hate Alex Jones and aren't 9/11 truthers. Face it, at the very least Ron Paul has endorsed the legitimacy of people questioning this ("the government is inviting the conspiracy theories") and Ron Paul has questions about it himself (questions about timing, the DNA claims and he needs more details). Why you just can't let people including Ron Paul make up their own minds about this is beyond me.
 
Proof, verified by an uninterested 3rd party would convince me (I'm not an Alex Jones-er, btw). The US regime has plenty to gain by lying, and you know it. Considering that the government lies about even petty things, you would be incredibly naive NOT to question the "official" story.

Yep. I've seen quite a few people on this forum who have a record of not being truthers raising questions about this. I even heard a talk radio host who's as anti-truther as you can get raising questions over the past couple of days. It just doesn't all add up.
 
Ron is on Cavuto right now talking about the details of the assault. He even compared it to the Saddam capture, and said "it wasn't much of a firefight".

"Just because Ron Paul is apparently smart enough to know that doesn't make him a liar."
No. If he is saying he believes Osama was killed in Pakistan, and he does not believe that, he is a liar. Because he would be telling a lie.

A) You're cherry picking only the reports that you think support your position.
B) Even talking about the "details" doesn't prove he believes those details. After all those "details" have been changing every 6 hours (or less).
 
Yep. I've seen quite a few people on this forum who have a record of not being truthers raising questions about this. I even heard a talk radio host who's as anti-truther as you can get raising questions over the past couple of days. It just doesn't all add up.

Talked to a Marine and Vietnam vet who has been as gung-ho as it gets about finding Osama bin Laden, and even he thinks the official story on this raid stinks to high heaven.

Approval ratings low.

+ Gas prices high.

=This was Obama's hail mary, but it may have been a trick play.

Personally, I think I've listened to about 10 minutes of Alex Jones my whole life, and not all in one sitting.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top