Fact: the universe was never created.
I guess most people are too busy arguing to watch a one hour video?
Depends on how you define "created." If you mean creation out of nothing than modern day advanced science is trending against that. Though those theories are far from being securely established. They are theories, not Theories. Mathematical constructs of the Universe have been disproven before, don't bet all your eggs on this one being absolutely correct either.
If you mean creation in the sense that God created something from formerly chaotic parts, such as a watchmaker creating a watch from a chaotic gathering of small metal bits, then you are closer to the truth. The Hebrew of the Old Testament even backs this up as the word often translated as "created" in Genesis holds the connotation of "organized", not made something appear from nothing.
You didn't get to the part about time expansion.I listened to it in the background. It's interesting. Basically he went back to some early commentators who wrote about the Bible before the creationism/evolutionism debate began and made the claim that they believed the Bible looked at days 1 - 5 of creation differently than day 6 onward. Interesting theory. I've heard it before but without the "Old Bible commentators said this" twist. The problem I have with that theory is that it puts sin before death, but God made it clear to Adam and Eve that death would be the result of their sin as opposed to the process of their creation. But it is an interesting theory. Oh, and just ignore the people who troll you by wanting to argue without taking the time to watch what you presented. That's just the nature of the beast hear at RPF.
Depends on how you define "created." If you mean creation out of nothing than modern day advanced science is trending against that. Though those theories are far from being securely established. They are theories, not Theories. Mathematical constructs of the Universe have been disproven before, don't bet all your eggs on this one being absolutely correct either.
If you mean creation in the sense that God created something from formerly chaotic parts, such as a watchmaker creating a watch from a chaotic gathering of small metal bits, then you are closer to the truth. The Hebrew of the Old Testament even backs this up as the word often translated as "created" in Genesis holds the connotation of "organized", not made something appear from nothing.
The next question would be, which universe?
You didn't get to the part about time expansion.
Fact: the universe was never created.
He explains how time isn't a constant. When the universe was much smaller, time passed at a different speed than it does now. He said something along the lines, "If when the Big Bang happened, someone had been sending out a pulse of light at one second intervals, and encoded in that light was the message, "I am sending this pulse once every second.", if we were able to see it today, the time between those pulses would be something like fifteen minutes."Well admittedly I was doing something else at the time. I'll listen to it again, but I did hear that part I think. (The part about there being some places in the universe where a clock would seem to move imperceptibly slow?) I'm not sure how that answers the question of whether or not death preceded sin.![]()
He explains how time isn't a constant. When the universe was much smaller, time passed at a different speed than it does now. He said something along the lines, "If when the Big Bang happened, someone had been sending out a pulse of light at one second intervals, and encoded in that light was the message, "I am sending this pulse once every second.", if we were able to see it today, the time between those pulses would be something like fifteen minutes."
Yes, and a smaller universe would mean there was much more gravity. As the universe expands, our clocks tick relatively faster.It's amazing how gravity influences both time itself and the perception of time.
I feel like some of the people in this thread didn't pay attention in school.
Evolution isn't a scientific theory?
![]()
Evolution is a scientific theory. It is important to qualify the theory as 'scientific', because when people use the word theory in 'normal' conversation, they mean a hunch or a guess. Scientists have a word for that. In science, this type of intelligent guessing is called a hypothesis. A scientific theory, however, carries much more importance. Scientists do not lightly assign the term theory to an idea. There are many experiments and observations by many scientists over a large span of time.
Why can't evolution be thought of as being the tool God used to bring about what we now have as life on Earth? Creation could very well have happened in six twenty-four hour days.
He didn't have to. But in essence, He did. He just made those six days take billions of years by our reckoning of time.Well I am too busy at the moment to watch (but will later), but I have a question:
Why couldn't an omnipotent creator create a universe in six days that was already billions of years old?
He explains how time isn't a constant. When the universe was much smaller, time passed at a different speed than it does now. He said something along the lines, "If when the Big Bang happened, someone had been sending out a pulse of light at one second intervals, and encoded in that light was the message, "I am sending this pulse once every second.", if we were able to see it today, the time between those pulses would be something like fifteen minutes."