BI: "Obnoxious Troll Asks Massachusetts Governor If Marathon Attack Was A 'False Flag'"

[BlackTerrel]

If a reporter for FoxNews used the same press conference to ask "was it a Muslim" - would that be ok?

 

[Petar]

If a reporter for FoxNews used the same press conference to ask "was it a Muslim" - would that be ok?

There is no shortage of individuals in the media postulating that it may have been a moslem or a tea-partier.

What there is a shortage of is individuals who have the intelligence/balls to ask if this could have been a false-flag government operation.

In case you weren't aware, that's what incidences such as this usually consist of.

 

[silverhandorder]

So according to conspiracy nuts no one can snap in a country of 300 million?

 

[itshappening]

So according to conspiracy nuts no one can snap in a country of 300 million?

No one can plant two bombs in front of the worlds media and disappear like a fart in the wind.

 

[Petar]

So according to conspiracy nuts no one can snap in a country of 300 million?

No, according to anyone with half a brain, these types of incidences are usually government conspiracies, so government must be considered the number 1 suspect until it is absolutely ruled out as such.

 

[phill4paul]

So according to conspiracy nuts no one can snap in a country of 300 million?

It is possible. Conspiracy theorists look for underlying causes. In this case the conspiracy could simply be that there was advanced warning and authorities choose not to warn the participants. In the case of 9/11 it could simply be that there was a major intelligence blunder and that no one was fired over it. In the case of school shootings it could simply be that media and government are ignoring the affect of SSRI's due to big pharma lobbying.
Why do you have a problem when people try to look at a subject from many angles?

 

[Carehn]

It wasn't the venue for rhetorical questions. Maybe in a few days, but this was too soon.

No, its was a day to late. They where talking about domestic terrorists seconds after the bombs went off.

 

[ghengis86]

No one can plant two bombs in front of the worlds media and disappear like a fart in the wind.

^this. Not in our surveillance state full of cameras a see-something-say-something robots.

 

[jmdrake]

So according to conspiracy nuts no one can snap in a country of 300 million?

Oh sure. Now how often do they snap when there are bomb sniffing dogs and roof spotters in place and it's being announced over the loudspeaker "This is just a drill?" And according to the witness, who is a marathon coach, this has not been happening at marathons lately. Now it's possible that there was some advanced intel. The government should just say that and quit the "We had no advanced intel" BS line we're being fed.

 

[Ranger29860]

No one can plant two bombs in front of the worlds media and disappear like a fart in the wind.

1. If the "worlds media" is there to cover an event and focus on the runners they sure as hell could.

2. If they are in a crowd as big as there was there, yes they could.

3. They were in bags and backpacks. You know how many people carry those in an event like this? They are having (as far as I can tell) to get every single photograph possible of the event and compare who has a back pack and who dropped one and when and where.

4. You assume one person did this, there could be multiple people involved and would make there job of spotting them that much harder.

 

[Ranger29860]

Oh sure. Now how often do they snap when there are bomb sniffing dogs and roof spotters in place and it's being announced over the loudspeaker "This is just a drill?" And according to the witness, who is a marathon coach, this has not been happening at marathons lately. Now it's possible that there was some advanced intel. The government should just say that and quit the "We had no advanced intel" BS line we're being fed.

Because if they got intel at the last minute they might not want to tip of who there source was. If I was the bomber and I was told that they knew what I was going to do before it happens I start looking at who knew and when or who could of figured it out. IF anything letting that fact get out of there would cause me to scramble and take off. Granted there is a decent chance they already have.

 

[phill4paul]

Because if they got intel at the last minute they might not want to tip of who there source was. If I was the bomber and I was told that they knew what I was going to do before it happens I start looking at who knew and when or who could of figured it out. IF anything letting that fact get out of there would cause me to scramble and take off. Granted there is a decent chance they already have.

I'm sure those killed and injured would find great solace that their lives were not as important as catching the bomber.

 

[Ranger29860]

I'm sure those killed and injured would find great solace that their lives were not as important as catching the bomber.

I would like you to meet my friend.

 

[phill4paul]

Witty are you.

I would like you to meet my friend.

 

[VoteRandPaul2016]

Oh sure. Now how often do they snap when there are bomb sniffing dogs and roof spotters in place and it's being announced over the loudspeaker "This is just a drill?" And according to the witness, who is a marathon coach, this has not been happening at marathons lately. Now it's possible that there was some advanced intel. The government should just say that and quit the "We had no advanced intel" BS line we're being fed.

This.

 

[jmdrake]

Because if they got intel at the last minute they might not want to tip of who there source was. If I was the bomber and I was told that they knew what I was going to do before it happens I start looking at who knew and when or who could of figured it out. IF anything letting that fact get out of there would cause me to scramble and take off. Granted there is a decent chance they already have.

So if you were a bomber you wuold just hang around to see if you got caught or not? Mmmmm....okay. I wouldn't but okay.

Edit : The problem with your analysis is that it doesn't take into account the overall pattern of "drills" happening right when terrorist attacks happen. On 9/11 NORAD was running drills simulating hijacked airplanes as flying bombs. At the 7/7 bombings drills were being run. And, now that the cat's out of the bag, there's not logical reason for the government to continue to say "Oh...we didn't have any advanced intel." You "skittish terrorist" would figure that out from the drill announcment that's already been on the news. Nice try though.

 

[donnay]

After some research I understand that they supposedly used a pressure cooker as a vessel--kind of like a pipe bomb. I guess because I watch very little television programming like; CSI, my naivete precedes me.

I stumbled across this site, and started reading some comments--Dan Bidondi God bless you for asking the right questions that the average Joe is now questioning! "What is a false flag?"

http://gawker.com/5994842/here-are-photos-of-the-pressure+cooker-bomb-used-in-boston?post=58890535


Then I came across this article from the Washington Post:

Homeland Security warned about terrorist use of pressure cooker bombs in 2004

Posted by Caitlin Dewey on April 16, 2013 at 1:43 pm

Few Americans are likely to be familiar with pressure cooker bombs, the explosives reportedly used in Monday’s Boston Marathon attacks – but the Department of Homeland Security has been on alert for the devices since at least 2004, according to an internal memo from that year.

The almost decade-old memo described pressure cooker bombs as “a technique commonly taught in Afghan terrorist training camps.”

To be clear, there’s no evidence linking Monday’s attacks to foreign terrorists. Just as important to keep in mind is that a great deal may have changed in the nine years since DHS released the memo, particularly in terms of who uses these sorts of devices and where.

The memo goes on:

Typically, these bombs are made by placing TNT or other explosives in a pressure cooker and attaching a blasting cap at the top of the pressure cooker. The size of the blast depends on the size of the pressure cooker and the amount of explosive placed inside. Pressure cooker bombs are made with readily available materials and can be as simple or as complex as the builder decides. These types of devices can be initiated using simple electronic components including, but not limited to, digital watches, garage door openers, cell phones or pagers. As a common cooking utensil, the pressure cooker is often overlooked when searching vehicles, residences or merchandise crossing the U.S. Borders.

The 2004 memo mentions foiled plots in France, Nepal and Jammu, India. A series of seven pressure cooker bombs killed more than 200 people in India in 2006, during the Mumbai train attacks.


Source:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...rrorist-use-of-pressure-cooker-bombs-in-2004/

Then this pamphlet (2010) was issued by DHS:

http://info.publicintelligence.net/DHSpressurecookerieds.pdf


Then I research a little more and came across this article from the Atlantic:

http://www.theatlantic.com/internat...irst-english-language-magazine-is-here/59006/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~






So here we have the authorities saying in 2004, that pressure cookers are devices used in other jihad attacks and a supposed drill going on the day of the marathon, yet these devices were never detected by all the alphabet soup groups milling about smartly with bomb sniffing dogs at the marathon?

 

[JK/SEA]

Bottom line: he asked the question BLUNTLY> got an answer> its now DOCUMENTED.

Mission accomplished.

 

[TruckinMike]

Smh at people defending this reporter without any solid evidence.

So, it's fine for us to cry wolf, but how is this any different than libs who jump at the chance to label any attack the work of 'right wing extremists'? What about neocons that cry 'Muslim'?

If I'm not mistaken, I read some where that 17 of the past 21 major terrorism plots/arrests had FBI informants orchestrating the events. Not to mention that damn near every time there has been an "attack" the government has been performing a training exercise of the very type in the immediate area. And many speculate ---> was the case in Boston.

Who knows the truth? But if folks believe our government, it is they that are truly moronic, a danger to themselves, and their neighbors.


EDIT: OOPS, looks like someone beat me to it.

 

[BlackTerrel]

There is no shortage of individuals in the media postulating that it may have been a moslem or a tea-partier.

This black conservative that no one heard of speculated it may have been a Muslim and was attacked in the media.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/...muslims_n_3087642.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular

Why is Alex Jones better than him?