BI: "Obnoxious Troll Asks Massachusetts Governor If Marathon Attack Was A 'False Flag'"

[V3n]

Lady_V3n and I heard the question and thought it was great!

Of course he wasn't going to get the answer he was looking for, but the point was to ask. On National television, he spoke the words and thousands of people heard it. Putting the question out there, first, straight into people's ears - might make them think.

We didn't know it was an Infowars guy, and it doesn't matter, no one at home knew that either, we were excited to hear that someone asked the question - that we have come at least far enough as a People that someone is asking.

 

[Reason]

^This. Sorry but the question was poorly framed and the "reporter" looked like an idiot. He should have asked "Can you respond to a report on local NBC affiliate channel 15 that the crowd was being told there was a bomb drill going on before the bomb went off?" Set the MSM against itself rather than setting yourself up.

This.

 

[Sonny Tufts]

This won't satisfy the morons who blame the government for everything bad that happens, but it's a good read:

http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2...rists_will_have_a_tough_time_with_boston.html

 

[Cody1]

Smh at people defending this reporter without any solid evidence.

So, it's fine for us to cry wolf, but how is this any different than libs who jump at the chance to label any attack the work of 'right wing extremists'? What about neocons that cry 'Muslim'?

You're right.

Personally i'm so sick of this that I want something incredibly draconian to happen. Americans are so fucking dumb it's laughable anymore. Television and other media outlets over the years have created a sick and disturbing duality of American existence where our citizens actually believe we are intellectual, free, rich, God fearing, hell..damn near perfect! I'm sorry i'm having a bad day. Don't mean to smear the intellectual capabilities of 300 million people, that's quite a broad brush. Things could be worse you know, I could have been blown up at a marathon or something.

 

[mczerone]

Why not "Brave Journalist" instead of "Obnoxious Troll"?

Because someone who genuinely believes that this could have been a FF would know that the people running the press conference would either lie out of necessity or be insulated from the knowledge that it was a FF.

It was a troll move. Either that or the infowars correspondent is stupid enough to believe that the people who perpetrated a FF would come out and directly admit it.

 

[V3n]

Just to add.. I'm not saying whether I think it was False or not.. but I still appreciate that it was asked.
I believe questioning authority is a good thing.

 

[itshappening]

This won't satisfy the morons who blame the government for everything bad that happens, but it's a good read:

http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2...rists_will_have_a_tough_time_with_boston.html

Yes, we're morons.

I've already contacted Weigel and asked him if he'll have a tough time explaining the man on the roof and the eyewitness accounts of drills before and during the bombings.

I doubt i'll hear back because he truly is a moron not me - or anyone else - asking questions.

 

[mczerone]

Lady_V3n and I heard the question and thought it was great!

Of course he wasn't going to get the answer he was looking for, but the point was to ask. On National television, he spoke the words and thousands of people heard it. Putting the question out there, first, straight into people's ears - might make them think.

We didn't know it was an Infowars guy, and it doesn't matter, no one at home knew that either, we were excited to hear that someone asked the question - that we have come at least far enough as a People that someone is asking.

That's called trolling.

And while it might excite people who are looking for FFs and already be conspiratorial, it will further polarize those who still trust the govt. They'll think that to question the official story is to be an obnoxious outsider. That's what trolling does.

 

[phill4paul]

This won't satisfy the morons who blame the government for everything bad that happens, but it's a good read:

http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2...rists_will_have_a_tough_time_with_boston.html

So Weigals premise is that AJ is wrong because there were no announcements to remain calm? How does this jibe with what coach Ali Stevenson had to say about it? Has coach Ali Stevenson been debunked? Did I miss that?

University of Mobile’s Cross Country Coach, who was near the finish line of the Boston Marathon when a series of explosions went off, said he thought it was odd there were bomb sniffing dogs at the start and finish lines.
　
“They kept making announcements to the participants do not worry, it’s just a training exercise,” Coach Ali Stevenson told Local 15.

Stevenson said he saw law enforcement spotters on the roofs at the start of the race. He’s been in plenty of marathons in Chicago, D.C., Chicago, London and other major metropolitan areas but has never seen that level of security before.
　
“Evidently, I don’t believe they were just having a training exercise,” Stevenson said. “I think they must have had some sort of threat or suspicion called in.”

In the search for truth questions must be asked. The conspiracy here could simply be that there was a bomb threat that was considered serious enough to cause an escalation in police presence, but not enough to allow citizens to make up their own mind regarding the threat.

 

[itshappening]

When a terrorist bombs they usually give warning or claim responsibility.

i.e see IRA bombings of England and London.

Nobody is claiming this. It is right to suggest it stinks to high heaven.

 

[VoteRandPaul2016]

When a terrorist bombs they usually give warning or claim responsibility.

i.e see IRA bombings of England and London.

Nobody is claiming this. It is right to suggest it stinks to high heaven.

Perhaps the "globalists" have learned from their past clean up jobs and have changed strategy?

 

[itshappening]

BTW, Weigel was part of a conspiracy himself. He was a member of 'journo-list' setup by Ezra Klein to smear political enemies especially those on the right.

How do these people retain credibility? And we're supposed to take their word for it and not make up our own minds?

Weigel had a tough job explaining that one. In fact, it cost him his job.

 

[itshappening]

Prof. DiLorenzo asks a question. Burn him!!

-
Something to Ponder About the Boston Marathon Murderer(s)
Posted by Thomas DiLorenzo on April 16, 2013 01:52 PM

One legacy of 9/11 was that America has been turned into a Stalinist police state that makes Stalin look like a rank amateur. Stalin had to employ thousands of human spies to spy on their neighbors. Our government does that, of course, but also utilizes mind-boggling new technology including satellites and drones. Every city in America is polluted with thousands of "security" and "red light" cameras; just about every store in Boston has cameras; there are cameras at most intersections; and on Marathon Day the entire world's media was set up right there at the finish line where the bombs went off with cameras rolling.

So my question is this: According to news reports, the bombs were made of gallon-and-a-half metal pressure cookers filled with ball bearings and nails and a detonation device. They must have been extremely heavy. Why has not one camera captured someone lugging and struggling with a large, heavy duffel bag with a giant bomb and shrapnel in it into that Lenscrafter store in Boston where the bomb went off?

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/135755.html

 

[jtstellar]

Why not "Brave Journalist" instead of "Obnoxious Troll"?

cus he's not mel gibson

 

[VoteRandPaul2016]

Prof. DiLorenzo asks a question. Burn him!!

-
Something to Ponder About the Boston Marathon Murderer(s)
Posted by Thomas DiLorenzo on April 16, 2013 01:52 PM

One legacy of 9/11 was that America has been turned into a Stalinist police state that makes Stalin look like a rank amateur. Stalin had to employ thousands of human spies to spy on their neighbors. Our government does that, of course, but also utilizes mind-boggling new technology including satellites and drones. Every city in America is polluted with thousands of "security" and "red light" cameras; just about every store in Boston has cameras; there are cameras at most intersections; and on Marathon Day the entire world's media was set up right there at the finish line where the bombs went off with cameras rolling.

So my question is this: According to news reports, the bombs were made of gallon-and-a-half metal pressure cookers filled with ball bearings and nails and a detonation device. They must have been extremely heavy. Why has not one camera captured someone lugging and struggling with a large, heavy duffel bag with a giant bomb and shrapnel in it into that Lenscrafter store in Boston where the bomb went off?

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/135755.html

Even non-conspiracy theorists are starting to catch on to their bull shit.

 

[awake]

I disagree. While the spotlight was shining brightly and lots of people around the nation (and world) were focused in, it was the perfect time to ask. More exposure to the concept of false flags.

If this was, or was not, is yet to be determined and may never be determined. But it might have made more people who were watching say "What's a false flag?"

It just seems a little odd to me that we have all these recent shootings and then this. It sure makes it easier to sell the false sense of "safety and security" of the police state. Disarm and increase security everywhere, it is justified. And after some of the information revealed on OKC, whose to say what is real, and what is not.

From what I have read, there were lots of bomb sniffing dogs at the start and finish lines, and spotters on roofs (http://www.local15tv.com/news/local...Spotters-on-Roofs/BrirjAzFPUKKN8z6eSDJEA.cspx).

My hunch.... they had a warning / tip / knowledge of something from someone (false flag / terrorist / lone wolf / whatever), tried to stop it, failed, and now deny they had any warning so they don't look incompetent.

I would say this is the case. And instead of being fired, they will get raises if they hide the fact they did nothing to protect any one. Any one want to ask why there was no evacuation? And why no one looses a job?

 

[Brett85]

But not every event that receives widespread media coverage directly involves the government. That's the problem with InfoWars, they 'cry wolf' on everything. If there every is a government plot, no one is going to take them seriously because that's what they always say.

Loughner was a false flag.
Holmes was a false flag.
Lanza was a false flag.

Because as we all know, it's not possible for a random nut with no direct government involvement to go on a killing spree.

That's basically what I think. It's certainly possible that you could have an actual legitimate conspiracy theory that turns out to be true, but you lose credibility when you just say that every random event that happens is a conspiracy.

 

[Anti Federalist]

It wasn't the venue for rhetorical questions. Maybe in a few days, but this was too soon.

Why?

Is anybody going to be less dead or injured?

Why ask any questions at all then?

 

[ghengis86]

Not a single camera or witnesses for 5, count em 5, bombs placed in trash cans?

How were the others found? And why weren't they detonated?

Any passports found?

 

[Anti Federalist]

Because someone who genuinely believes that this could have been a FF would know that the people running the press conference would either lie out of necessity or be insulated from the knowledge that it was a FF.

It was a troll move. Either that or the infowars correspondent is stupid enough to believe that the people who perpetrated a FF would come out and directly admit it.

Meh, no different than what the last few White House correspondents used to do.

Of course, I say "used to".

Now, the press corps, being the good government organs they are, just regurgitate every ounce of bullshit that the government feeds them.