Benton suggests Romney Campaign involved with Caucus Cancellation

[wgadget]

Jesse called Washington an RP stronghold.

 

[alucard13mmfmj]

Jesse called Washington an RP stronghold.

damn straight he should call them. raise hell. RAISE HELL.

 

[Karsten]

If we wanted to win it, we'd win it. Because Ron Paul could have a day long "hang out with Ron Paul all day" if he wanted to. And 1000 people in Washington county would do that. The Ron Paul Rock Concert and Free Beer Washington County Caucus.

So why don't we?
It's next Saturday.

 

[parocks]

It's a strong college area from what I've read.

it is not a college area. And it wasn't strong for Ron Paul in 2008.

But if Ron Paul is at the caucus, people will show up and vote for him because he's a rockstar. We won Androscoggin with record turnout.

 

[wgadget]

Do it. Show em we haven't lost our fighting spirit and that we are onto them.

 

[alucard13mmfmj]

it is not a college area. And it wasn't strong for Ron Paul in 2008.

But if Ron Paul is at the caucus, people will show up and vote for him because he's a rockstar. We won Androscoggin with record turnout.

It is worth a try ^^ go spend a day there or at least a few hours with VOTERS.. not supporters.. VOTERS. I expect him to be in the next state like right now though. Is he in Washington or Michigan now?

 

[Vanilluxe]

It is worth a try ^^ go spend a day there or at least a few hours with VOTERS.. not supporters.. VOTERS. I expect him to be in the next state like right now though. Is he in Washington or Michigan now?

We should also concentrate on other counties with half-full precincts and the math will add up! We must let the Romney campaign know that there are consequences and what goes around comes around!

 

[jolynna]

The science behind these elections doesn't exactly seem well...exact.

Romney didn't win Iowa after it was re-counted.

It is hard to not think about that little mishap.

And the guy reading the results seemed really, really nervous. Not accusing. Just saying it never hurts to insist on things being done correctly and thoroughly.

 

[parocks]

So why don't we?
It's next Saturday.

Right. But this is up to Ron Paul. Ron Paul is the rockstar. The headliner.

 

[parocks]

It isn't as if caucus counting hasn't been messed up before.

Turns out Romney didn't win Iowa after it was CORRECTLY counted.

The science behind these elections doesn't exactly seem well...exact.

They're leaving off most of Waldo county, Waterville, and they're disenfranchising (maybe) much of Hancock and all of Washington.

 

[parocks]

It is worth a try ^^ go spend a day there or at least a few hours with VOTERS.. not supporters.. VOTERS. I expect him to be in the next state like right now though. Is he in Washington or Michigan now?

Ron Paul needs to be AT THE CAUCUS.

Ron Paul got 1 vote in New Gloucester in 2008.
Ron Paul got 49 votes in New Gloucester in 2012.

Why, because he was at the New Gloucester caucus.

People heard that he was at the caucus and wanted to see him. While they were there, they caucused for him.

Would 49 people gone to that caucus if Ron Paul wasn't there? NO

 

[JJ2]

I can't wait to hear what Alex Jones says this afternoon.

 

[Karsten]

I've scoffed at people who claim foul when they lose... but nothing looks more like fraud than what went down today.

 

[parocks]

And they announced on TV it's over and done, those Washington County votes will NOT be counted. The publicity of a win for Ron must NOT be allowed and Romney could not be allowed to lose in his backyard by 9 whole percent. 42% to 33% -- > a deal was cut at the last minute because Mitt met with GOP last night.... and they did it.. simply gave him 400 votes for nothing.. see the charts, they are exactly the SAME.

Those charts. Pure Bullshit. That's Watch The Vote. Competely meaningless. Yes, those charts contain interesting numbers that are nice to look at when there are no real, official numbers to look at. When you're looking at those charts your looking at something the government or the gop had nothing to do with.

 

[Karsten]

When you're looking at those charts your looking at something the government or the gop had nothing to do with.

Then how could it be bullshit?

 

[parocks]

We can't run Rand in 2016 if anyone but Obama wins.

When is Rand up for reelection to the US Senate?

 

[JJ2]

Those charts. Pure Bullshit. That's Watch The Vote. Competely meaningless. Yes, those charts contain interesting numbers that are nice to look at when there are no real, official numbers to look at. When you're looking at those charts your looking at something the government or the gop had nothing to do with.

That's what makes them more trustworthy!

(Sorry, it was too easy to resist!)

 

[Karsten]

When is Rand up for reelection to the US Senate?

You guessed it, 2016.

 

[JJ2]

You guessed it, 2016.

Does that mean he has to give up his Senate bid if he becomes the nominee? Which might prevent him from running?

 

[DerickVonD]

Does that mean he has to give up his Senate bid if he becomes the nominee? Which might prevent him from running?

I think if Ron doesn't win and there is an America left, that Rand Paul will have a great chance to become president. I think Rand would probably appeal to a larger audience than Ron can. Face it alot of people vote based on appearance.