No. it is to have safe civilized society. You stop making thing up.
Ban Guns
- Thread starter JohnLVT
- Start date
No. it is to have safe civilized society. You stop making thing up.
Where do you live?
OH the percentage game to confuse. What is it? 60,000 a year die from gunshot - carnage. The aim is ZERO. ZERO tolerance.
zHorns
Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2011
- Messages
- 876
Like Great Britain. Police have NO guns on them.
The freedom to walk down the street and not be threatened by people with firearms, private people or the state. This freedom is denied to many in countries like the USA. Americans need to get heir basic freedom back. Get into the 21st century.
You can't talk about private property either? Wow!
I will ask again In which country do you live in ? and Where do you come from?
Last edited:
zHorns
Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2011
- Messages
- 876
No, you're really confused. Freedom of speech cannot be abridged by the state.
This is a private forum, which means, freedom of speech doesn't apply here. They can ban you for saying "pineapple", it doesn't matter.
tod evans
Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2008
- Messages
- 36,071
Hey, I'm all for this guy not having guns.........In fact let him convince as many people as he wants not to own guns.
Just stay the hell away from the RIGHTS of others to own guns.
If he could convince cops not to carry guns I'm sure lots of people (and their dogs) would be grateful.
Either way for God's sake please don't introduce more legislation!
Just stay the hell away from the RIGHTS of others to own guns.
If he could convince cops not to carry guns I'm sure lots of people (and their dogs) would be grateful.
Either way for God's sake please don't introduce more legislation!
WilliamC
Member
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2007
- Messages
- 6,682
No, but the person posting it is.
Some liberty forum if they do that eh! This sounds like Nazism they way you say it - do and think like us or else. All those millions in WW2 died for nothing then if that is what you want.
Last edited:
Nathan Hale
Member
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2007
- Messages
- 4,155
Great thread! Apparently JohnLVT got lost coming out of the Bill Maher forums or something.
I want more freedom. Freedom from fear of people with guns.
zHorns
Member
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2011
- Messages
- 876
Once again, you're confused.
We are big believers in restraining the state and exercising private property rights.
The "liberty" thing to do is respect the decisions of the owner of this forum in banning you. He's practicing his private property rights.
otherone
Member
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2011
- Messages
- 9,638
Hello. Welcome to the RPF. I don't think you are aware of the basis and intent of the 2nd amendment. That's ok. This forum is an educational springboard for those who wish to honestly debate political issues. 911 exposed a basic human principle of which the founding fathers were keenly concerned:
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety
-Benjamin Franklin
Your Right to Safety is a positive Right, meaning someone or something must provide it for you. Where does that positive Right come from? Are you a tax payer? You realize that your positive Right comes from unwilling theft of someone else? Positive Rights, by their nature, come from the STATE. The State giving and taking away Rights is a terrifying prospect.
WilliamC
Member
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2007
- Messages
- 6,682
Yes he is now one of the few that has earned a place on my ignore list.
I don't mind folks with views different than mine, in fact it's much more likely I'm going to learn something new by debating with those who disagree with me than those who agree with me.
But that assumes there is an intelligent mind on the other end of the debate.
For some folks that's just not the case.
Pericles
Member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2008
- Messages
- 9,921
So, why is crime in the UK increasing?
But it is the naming of Britain as the most violent country in the EU that is most shocking. The analysis is based on the number of crimes per 100,000 residents.
In the UK, there are 2,034 offences per 100,000 people, way ahead of second-placed Austria with a rate of 1,677.
The U.S. has a violence rate of 466 crimes per 100,000 residents, Canada 935, Australia 92 and South Africa 1,609.
But it is the naming of Britain as the most violent country in the EU that is most shocking. The analysis is based on the number of crimes per 100,000 residents.
In the UK, there are 2,034 offences per 100,000 people, way ahead of second-placed Austria with a rate of 1,677.
The U.S. has a violence rate of 466 crimes per 100,000 residents, Canada 935, Australia 92 and South Africa 1,609.
Similar threads
