You'll have to take atheism up with an atheist. My post wasn't about it.
Also, you're evading what I wrote about the "fall of man".
Not at all. Do you think you deserve by virtue of being born to be granted paradise, something akin to the Garden of Eden? That endowed by your own existence, you should by default have eternity, omnipotence, unaided or unsupported by the Source of what brought you to existence? What works have you done to justify you eternal life? What have you created which should necessitate you the riches of life and the joys of heavenly bliss? Are you, just because you are, entitled to those things that came before you? Do you have the love of Christ? Do you have the mercy of Christ? Do you have the wisdom and power of Christ?
The fall of man happened because Adam tried to be a god by his own self and on his own terms, thinking he could do so in disobedience and without the grace of his Source and Creator, all because of pride and selfishness. This is the spirit of Ayn Rand's 'Objectivism'.
As for the fall, it was collectivist in a sense that it has affected our generation from the very beginning. If it was not 'collectivist', then Adam and his descendants would have lived for eternity estranged from the source of life. They would have themselves to be in the company of the demons.
Because of God's mercy, lest we lose any chance to return to Him, did He allow us to fall, so that He might one day come down amongst us, suffer with us, and show us the way back to Him and to His Kingdom. You seem to see the fall as a punishment, but it was not a punishment unto eternal death - for the Christian believes we all, the righteous
and the unrighteous, will one day rise again. But rather, so as an act of mercy, so that we might not follow the eternal path of satan and the demons into eternal darkness and estrangement from the Source and Creator of life, He gave us a way out and the opportunity to follow Him willfully and in truth.