Atheist Ron Paul supporters

[Revolution9]

1. You advocate that I am often mistaken, and then immediately claim to advocate nothing.
2. You hurl insults, then characterize MY method of disagreement as “childish”.
3. You claim I deserved the insult “clown” because I “clown around”.
4. You commit insults and get flagged for it, then claim I’m “so frakkin' sensitive”.
5. You insult and then claim you are only dishing out what has been dealt.
---------------------------
1. Direct contradiction (MULTIPLE contradiction, since you have advocated multiple claims).
2. Kettle calling the pot black.
3. Blaming me for your baseless initiation of aggression.
4. Trying to excuse your aggression, yet making another insult in the process.
5. Trying out a second excuse for behaving aggressively.

Now…what were you calling “childish”??

You sound frustrated. Tough luck for you. Try other tactics and you won't end up frustrated. As well, don't mistake sarcasm for seriousness as in the sensitive comment.

HTH
Rev9

 

[Revolution9]

Of course it looks like a mushroom. Here, I’ll make it easy for you. Look at the first letter in the word “TV”, and then look at the profile of a mature toadstool.

It is still not a cross but a T-square. A cross has a top section equivalent to the arms length. Mushrooms of any kind do not sport this geometry. Next fallacy. Andrew Weil was reaching on this one.

Rev9

 

[idirtify]

You sound frustrated. Tough luck for you. Try other tactics and you won't end up frustrated. As well, don't mistake sarcasm for seriousness as in the sensitive comment.

HTH
Rev9

It is most curious for the one who resorts to insults to characterize the other as “sounding frustrated” and “using tactics”. But OTOH, it is not really curious; since those who insult often resort to such hypocritical reversals – out of a frustration of not being able to support their position.

 

[idirtify]

It is still not a cross but a T-square. A cross has a top section equivalent to the arms length. Mushrooms of any kind do not sport this geometry. Next fallacy. Andrew Weil was reaching on this one.

Rev9

If you would correctly visualize the profile of a mature toadstool, you would see not only the two arms of the outstretched cap but also the top-most point of the arch of the cap.