Article: 'Donald Trump calls for revolution after Obama is declared the winner'

Sore losers.

So the goal was to make it seem like black people would revolt if obama lost, so now it will make it okay for crazy gun thumping conservatives to riot. Go ahead though, it's laughable how you think Donald Trump is on your side.
 
Trump is out of luck. It isn't 'revolution' it is r3VOLution.

And he plays no role in it.
 
Sore losers.

So the goal was to make it seem like black people would revolt if obama lost, so now it will make it okay for crazy gun thumping conservatives to riot. Go ahead though, it's laughable how you think Donald Trump is on your side.

No one here thinks Trump is on anyone's side but his own. I'm sure this was posted from irony.
 
He needs to mind his business and go fuck his mistress or something and leave the current issues with the experts.
 
Calling for a Revolution? I wonder if Obama will give Trump the same treatment as Anwar Alwaki?
 
I personally would like to see massive civil unrest.

If Trump can rally a few hundred thousand to stand with him it will only serve to expose the "Just-Us" for what it really is.

Can't you imagine the outcry when thousands of suit-wearing stuff-shirts are brought up on domestic terrorism charges and detained "indefinitely"?
 
Sore losers.

So the goal was to make it seem like black people would revolt if obama lost, so now it will make it okay for crazy gun thumping conservatives to riot. Go ahead though, it's laughable how you think Donald Trump is on your side.

I didn't write the article. But I clearly remember ol' Donald saying he "liked" Dr. Paul but Dr. Paul wasn't electable. And now he wants a r3VOLution. Billionaires usually get what they ask for, so let's give him one. "Becareful what you ask for, you may just get it."
 
I didn't write the article. But I clearly remember ol' Donald saying he "liked" Dr. Paul but Dr. Paul wasn't electable. And now he wants a r3VOLution. Billionaires usually get what they ask for, so let's give him one. "Becareful what you ask for, you may just get it."

He wasn't complimenting Ron, he was dismissing him. But who is more relevant to the results?

Trump endorsed and campaigned for Romney.
 
No one here thinks Trump is on anyone's side but his own. I'm sure this was posted from irony.
Please refer to this
I personally would like to see massive civil unrest.

If Trump can rally a few hundred thousand to stand with him it will only serve to expose the "Just-Us" for what it really is.

Can't you imagine the outcry when thousands of suit-wearing stuff-shirts are brought up on domestic terrorism charges and detained "indefinitely"?
I know this is just one opinion... but still, it's an opinion from someone on your side.
 
Please refer to this
I know this is just one opinion... but still, it's an opinion from someone on your side.

I personally would like to see massive civil unrest.

If Trump can rally a few hundred thousand to stand with him it will only serve to expose the "Just-Us" for what it really is.

Can't you imagine the outcry when thousands of suit-wearing stuff-shirts are brought up on domestic terrorism charges and detained "indefinitely"?


Your side?

Whos side?

If Trump and a load of his cronies (deeply entrenched republicans) rise-up against "the establishment" do you not think the "Just-Us" system would not lock them up post-haste under the guise of domestic terrorism?

And if this were to happen, who better it happen to than those who so maliciously maligned Dr. Paul?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top