You have a gift for the obvious.
Which was in response to someone saying people weren't going there to die on that hill.
Opinion courtesy of your crystal ball?
Really? Do you even have a clue just how much firepower can be brought against a few militia members with small arms. Get a clue.
Unlike 90% of the people around here I don't smoke that stuff. You are right that there is no guarantee that the public would turn against the feds but I still maintain that you have a whole lot better chance of winning the public opinion war if it isn't a two sided gun war.You think? I will tell you what I think: you're smoking things you ought leave alone. A majority of Americans put a lunatic in the Oval Office not once, but twice. A vast plurality wants to have his babies and defend his "record" no matter how dismal a failure it is. They are hopelessly bereft of intellect, integrity, honesty, or any other virtue you may care to name. They are cowards of the lowest order, by and large, and will do NOTHING no matter the trespass.
We are not talking about national armies, we are talking about small bands of revolutionaries pitting themselves against a public that is 70-80-90% against them and supporting the feds.Which is, of course, nonsense... unless you can provide factual figures proving that 90% of all armies that have engaged in battle have been killed, in which case I will have to concede the point, but not until then.
Last edited: