Gary Johnson Another good reason we should all really together to vote Gary Johnson

[tuggy24g]

 

[MozoVote]

The Michigan "3 minute" problem I expect will be thrown out by the court. Judges don't let minor matters of form do greater injustices. (Unless they are party hacks, of course.)

 

[acptulsa]

Oh, rally. I get it. We should really rally behind Johnson.

Well, it would do two things for us. It would demonstrate that we have the numbers to make a difference if we can stop acting like a herd of cats long enough to put our entire weight to work toward a specific goal--whether we all consider it the perfect goal or not. And it would demonstrate that it is possible to shove some impressive numbers through the Diebold filter and onto a third party--assuming, of course, that this really is possible and Diebold doesn't have a 'minimum duopoly stop-loss' function to their programming.

Something to be said for us acting like a bloc long enough to demonstrate that we have electoral muscle. Of course, if half of us insist on shoving east and half of us insist on shoving west, no one will ever discover that we have electoral muscle because we'll cancel ourselves out forever...

 

[Aratus]

i feel that even getting gary johnson into any of the debates is an achievement

 

[specsaregood]

i feel that even getting gary johnson into any of the debates is an achievement

It would be an "achievement" but I'm not convinced he'd do a good job of defending/promoting our positions. I think he might even hurt us. and by "our" and "us" I mean the general things most RP supporters agree upon.

 

[cajuncocoa]

I'm not voting for Johnson, but for those who are....this is for you:

 

[tuggy24g]

We need to in my option vote Gary Johnson. It is more important now then ever to do so. See the Gop want him off the ballot in a number of states. Are we just going to allow them to get away with something else again. We need to make a loud message. We need to stop this idea that writing in Ron Paul is the best thing to do. Voting Gary. Johnson would be best. Look if Ron Paul would go as a write in candidate I would vote for him. So since most states do not allow write in then why not work with everyone. Voting Johnson would be a way to shove it in the GOPS face.

 

[alucard13mmfmj]

Doesnt matter. Romney is going to lose without the Ron Paul's supporter's votes/grassroots. I wonder how many % will we cause Romney to lose by? 3%? 5%? 10%?

Obama has an army of real grassroots. Romney has to pretend he has grassroots supporting him with fake grassroots signs.

GOP needs Ron Paul fanatics to combat Obama's fanatics. lol. Too bad the GOP done goofed and screwed themselves.

 

[MozoVote]

I've been to two county executive meetings where they passed around a sign up sheet to call for Romney. Maybe one or two people put their names down. Last I heard, the Romney campaign was resorting to paying volunteers to man the phones.

Romney did open a field office in Charlotte, and the county chair is grateful for that as it helped him shuffle some office space around and save money. But it certainly seems like grassroots support is wafer thin. I have not even seen a Romney sign in anyone's yard all year long, from the primaries to now. Only local candidates (county/state).

 

[DavidK]

I'm not voting for abortion and "humanitarian" wars. Will you Johnson people go away, you're making us real Libertarians look bad.