Alleged payment to porn star was illegal donation to Trump campaign, watchdog says

avatar10908_7.gif

Confirmed alt
 
How's the Russia investigation going?

There was a merger and it seems to have turned into Hussia investigation (Or Hushia ?).
Seems similar switch like GOP basers/Moral Right had turned Monica-Clinton affair into Obstrution of Justice investigation/impeachment.


In other news, POTUS says Giuliani is a great guy but Kimmel has a different take:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iA-fY2dr9jc




REPORTER: Mr. President, how’s Rudy doing?

REPORTER: When did you find out?

TRUMP: I tell you what — Rudy is a great guy, but he just started a day ago. But he really has his heart into it. He’s working hard. He’s learning the subject matter. And he’s going to be issuing a statement too. But he is a great guy. He knows it’s a witch hunt. That’s what he knows. He’s seen a lot of them. And he said he’s never seen anything so horrible.
As an example, 33,000 emails requested by Congress with a subpoena, and they get burned, they get deleted. And nobody says anything. Give me a break.

So Rudy knows it’s a witch hunt. He started yesterday. He’ll get his facts straight. He’s a great guy. But what he does is he feels it’s a very bad thing for our country, and he happens to be right.

REPORTER: When did you find out what the retainer was being spent on?
TRUMP: Well, you’re going to find out, because we’re going to give a full list. And people know. And virtually everything said has been said incorrectly, and it’s been said wrong, or it’s been covered wrong by the press — just like NBC and ABC yesterday covered the story wrong.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/04/u...y-daniels.html

Giuliani says Trump doesn't have to comply with a Mueller subpoena and could invoke the Fifth Amendment
Washington Post 2h ago



Giuliani: It is possible Michael Cohen paid off other women for Trump

by Mark Berman May 6
When asked during an interview on ABC News’s “This Week” whether Michael Cohen, Trump’s personal attorney, had made payments to other women, Giuliani said he did not know of any but acknowledged that this could have happened.

“I have no knowledge of that,” Giuliani said. “But I would think if it was necessary, yes.”

Did Michael Cohen make payments to other women on behalf of the president? Rudy Giuliani tells @GStephanopoulos: “I have no knowledge of that, but I would think if it was necessary, yes." https://t.co/LYBy2d6vA3 pic.twitter.com/ESMcGETxx4

— ABC News (@ABC) May 6, 2018



https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-michael-cohen-paid-off-other-women-for-trump
 
Last edited:
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Mueller forced to delay court case alleging Russian interference after two lawyers call his bluff[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]FBI special counsel Robert Mueller is seeking to delay the first court hearing in a criminal case alleging Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election. Mueller has brought charges against three Russian companies and 13 Russians for the alleged interference.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]The delay comes after two attorneys representing one of the Russian entities began challenging Mueller’s evidence in the case.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]What are the details? [/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]According to Politico, the 13 Russians and three companies — the Internet Research Agency, Concord Management and Consulting and Concord Catering — were expected to ignore the indictments since they are outside U.S. jurisdiction.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]However, that’s not what happened. Last month, two lawyers representing Concord Management — Eric Dubelier and Kate Seikaly — surfaced. Mueller told the court Friday the lawyers made a series of discovery requests demanding nonpublic information about Mueller’s case. As attorneys representing one of the defendants, they are allowed to make such requests.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Politico reported that “the move appeared to be a bid to force Mueller’s team to turn over relevant evidence to the Russian firm and perhaps even to bait prosecutors into an embarrassing dismissal in order to avoid disclosing sensitive information.”[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]More from Politico:[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Prosecutors also asked a judge to postpone the formal arraignment of Concord Management set for next week.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]The prosecution team sought the delay on the grounds that it’s unclear whether Concord Management formally accepted the court summons related to the case. Mueller’s prosecutors also revealed that they tried to deliver the summonses for Concord and IRA through the Russian government, without success.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]And despite the fact that Mueller’s team provided Dubelier with a copy of the summons, Dubelier told Mueller’s team this week it was “defective.”[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]The delay will allow the court to determine if Dubelier’s client was properly served a summons, but it will also allow Mueller’s team to provide Dubelier and Seikaly with the requested evidence.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]According to Politico, Mueller’s team proposed both sides file briefs with the court to determine if Concord Management was properly summoned. Mueller’s team said they would file by May 25, while giving Concord’s attorneys until June 15.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]How did the judge rule?[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Federal Judge Dabney Friedrich, who was appointed by President Donald Trump in December to serve in the District of Columbia, did not immediately issue a ruling or postpone the arraignment.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]She instructed Concord’s attorneys to respond to prosecutor’s request to delay by Monday.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/05/05/mueller-forced-to-delay-court-case-alleging-russian-interference-after-two-lawyers-call-his-bluff?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=TheBlaze Daily PM 2018-05-05&utm_term=TheBlaze Daily PM%[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]
[/FONT]
 
Stormy Daniels’ lawyer just made an admission that actually helps President Trump’s legal case, according to scholars.
During an interview with ABC, Stormy’s lawyer Michael Avenatti said the president “had effectively an extramarital affair slush fund that was administered by [Trump’s lawyer] Michael Cohen,” which legal experts say is actually evidence that the payment to Stormy wasn’t related to Trump’s presidential campaign.
AVENATTI: “It’s important to think about what we just heard. According to Giuliani, this was commonplace. The president had effectively an extramarital affair slush fund that was administered by Michael Cohen & then he would just take care of it… they were a regular occurrence” pic.twitter.com/Z6yHzxi90X
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) May 6, 2018
A celebrity’s slush fund set up by his lawyer to handle what he considers “nuisance payments” is fairly routine – and it would explain why President Trump would know about payments but not necessarily the details of such payments.
And remember, Trump was a celebrity before he ever considered entering the political arena, and the affair Stormy claimed she had with Trump occurred in 2006.
“Giuliani has consistently painted the picture of Cohen as a fixer, who would make such payments out of a retainer fund so as not to burden his very busy clients with such trifles,” reported Law & Crime.
Payments made to others would effectively downplay the significance of the payment made to Stormy, legal experts suggest, because those would reveal a pattern by Cohen to pay out what he considered “nuisances” though a slush fund – and thus the payment to Stormy wasn’t politically motivated, regardless of the timing.
Earlier this month President Trump admitted the funds used to pay Stormy came out of a retainer to Cohen, which suggests the existence of a slush fund – and if the slush fund existed before Trump announced his presidential run, that would bolster Trump’s case even more.

More at: https://www.infowars.com/stormys-lawyer-helping-trumps-case-say-legal-experts/
 
Had not expected this story to become so big.

Trump due to file public financial disclosure amid questions of whether he will mention hush money deal for Stormy Daniels


  • President Donald Trump and thousands of other federal executive branch workers are due to file public financial disclosure forms Tuesday.
  • Trump's filing last year apparently did not disclose a debt to his longtime personal lawyer Michael Cohen.
  • Cohen had paid porn star Stormy Daniels $130,000 to keep quiet about an alleged affair with Trump.


Kevin Breuninger | Dan Mangan
Published 2 Hours Ago Updated 1 Hour

Thousands of federal executive branch employees are set to file public financial disclosure forms Tuesday — among them President Donald Trump.

The annually filed documents, which reveal the financial interests of federal workers, provide a rare window into the finances of Trump, who otherwise has notoriously eschewed traditions of transparency established by his recent predecessors in the White House.
This year's financial disclosure filing by Trump — which is not yet publicly available — could be especially significant.
The president is scheduled to file his form on the heels of a revelation from one of his lawyers, Rudy Giuliani, that Trump had repaid his personal attorney, Michael Cohen $130,000 last year.

That reimbursement was for a hush-money payment that Cohen made to porn star Stormy Daniels in late 2016 in exchange for her silence about an alleged affair with Trump. The White House has denied any such affair.
 
Back
Top