ALERT!!! Luntz just told the world to come to RP sites...

That's about it. First we pwn you, then if you still refuse to admit we make one or two good points we throw snowballs. Of course, on the internet they tend not to melt and soak down into your underwear or anything. But, hey. Fate worse than death, right Frank? Ya propagandist...

At least we don't waterboard our guests. :D
 
By all means, get on the internet. The more time someone spends on the net, the more likely they are to become Ron Paul supporters, socialists, people who troll message boards, people who post ridiculously hurtful comments on Youtube or some combination of the previously mentioned items.
 
Is that the guy who plants 30 or so handpicked supporters for the GOP and then has them dial a Quija board meter to mold the TV audience opinion? A modern day Carnival Barker.................
 
This just in from Frank Luntz: People are mean on the internet.

Lol, isn't that the truth. Try being a Ron Paul supporter on some other websites!

Attention Newbies, this is the "inside joke" as to why people say "FU Frank".

Frank probably doesn't like it, but this is where it comes from:

 
Last edited:
I see the sanitize squad is out. Make us look all politically correct and mirror good little behaving neocons the way big brother expects of us.
 
"I came for the cookies, I stayed for the truth!"

"Dr. Paul cured my apathy!"

"Ron Paul Forums has helped my attitude!"

"I learned there were others who think like I do!"

"I was plumb sick and tired of being scared all the time, thanks Ron Paul Forums!"

"I'm constantly challenged and encouraged to take the high road!"




:)
 
Ah, Mr manupilative Frank Luntz. Unlike Luntz we don't lie and decieve people. :)

That's the point. Luntz and Levin LIE about Ron by implication or through manipulation, or outright by printing stuff they know has already been debunked without mentioning that detail. We have strong feelings against them.

As to others, come argue with us. Maybe you have thought of something we haven't thought of yet. Please help our ideas get even better and sharper by challenging them.

But expect the same in return.

"Here there be monsters...." may be a bit rich, though....
 
Last edited:
Frank Luntz : I met you at the Ames Straw Poll. I asked you how you would report the story if Ron Paul got 1st or 2nd. You said the story would be that it was a "Big Deal" if Ron Paul won. I took you at your word, yet after the win you repeatedly failed to mention his name during any segments about GOP candidates and their performances.

You additionally stack your audiences with people who will represent the view of the agenda you are trying to promote. You don't find out what people think, you find people who think what you want them to. You put "undecided voters" in your focus groups that have been in prior focus groups from completely different states. You are responsible for the "Climate Change" phrase which so many of us despise. You are a master of manipulation.

That said, I welcome anyone you sent this way to discuss with us. We are a group of individuals, and do not adopt a collectivist mindset, so do not try to lump us all together. Each person here speaks for themselves, and it not an official representation of Ron Paul supporters.
 
Welcome new people that Luntz sent. Guess what, he's not going to dictate who the nominee is with his not so subtle mind games aka "focus groups"

It's not all rainbows and unicorns here, but if you're intelligent and fair, we treat you well.
 
This is a golden opportunity to practice emulating the good doctor himself. :):):):):):):):):)"smiley"

Tod, are you pandering????????? :D (Had to delete one of your pandering smiley faces in order to post. Hope you don't mind that I subbed my own "grin".
 
We must've been listening to different interviews then.

He said Ron Paul would probably win Iowa, he's got great organization, and he would gain points from the debate. Not exactly praising Paul, but not unfair.
 
He said Ron Paul would probably win Iowa, he's got great organization, and he would gain points from the debate. Not exactly praising Paul, but not unfair.

Has he not also said he has not chance against Obama, though he polls highest against him in all polls, except some where Romney is slightly higher?
 
Honestly, I have seen some pretty brutal stuff said on these forums. It needs to stop, because it can (and will) be used against us.
 
'ol frank is under the impression that just because we hate his guts that we would be anything other than pleasant and civil to the innocent victims of his propaganda.
 
He said Ron Paul would probably win Iowa, he's got great organization, and he would gain points from the debate. Not exactly praising Paul, but not unfair.


And then implied that "we" cheated on the "wayin" poll..

Selective hearing ownz u.:p
 
Honestly, I have seen some pretty brutal stuff said on these forums. It needs to stop, because it can (and will) be used against us.

You and all other members have the ability to report any posts you feel are against forum guidelines.
 
Back
Top