1000s of fish wash ashore, 1000s of birds fall from the sky in Arkansas

I wonder how much of this is exaggerated by environazis. I mean they claimed wi-fi was killing trees in Amsterdam when it was really soil compaction. Oh and lets not forget CO2, the gas plants breathe was also bad.
 
HazyHusky420 said:
I wonder how much of this is exaggerated by environazis. I mean they claimed wi-fi was killing trees in Amsterdam when it was really soil compaction. Oh and lets not forget CO2, the gas plants breathe was also bad.
Click to expand...

These bird & fish things are actually fairly common throughout time .
 
Fox McCloud said:
Or we could realize that burning a leaky-roofed home is legitimate, especially when the home-owners have aggressed against you. If we merely stuck to property right the EPA would not be needed in the slightest--if you pollute someone else's property, against their wishes, you get fined/shut down/jailed---if they agree to it, then that person has no right to complain.
Click to expand...

Sure, if the home owners want to live out in the cold.

A home is a necessity. One fixes the leaky roof.

Expanding on the analogy, corporations have proven themselves polluters for profit. The number of corporations that are environmentally aware on their own is indeed rare, and many times are aware due to strict environmental protection laws.

Your "property rights" are a pure smoke screen that illustrates, at the risk of being insulting, a complete and utter ignorance on just how much pollution is spewed when EPA laws are relaxed. No one can live in, or near, Love Canal. No one can recoup the loss of their investment in their homes. No one can live on land once occupied by steel plants and other former industries now gone, leaving large swathes of toxic brown fields not even safe for kids to play in. Factories pump millions of tons of mercury laden poisons into the Hudson. Whose property is spoiled? Factories spew millions of tons of poison into the air. Whose property is impacted even as children cough their lungs out?

The difference in causing a company a 4.8% profit margin as opposed to a 4.9% profit margin to force them to take measures to ensure they are not pumping poisons into the air, the ground, or the water is well worth it.
 
the birds were caught up in a large jet wash from a UFO...as it sped off to the gulf to dump its 5 light years of sewage....hence the dead fish...

the quandary has been solved.....yea
 
puppetmaster said:
the birds were caught up in a large jet wash from a UFO...as it sped off to the gulf to dump its 5 light years of sewage....hence the dead fish...

the quandary has been solved.....yea
Click to expand...

Now we're getting somewhere. :)
 
AxisMundi said:
Sure, if the home owners want to live out in the cold.

A home is a necessity. One fixes the leaky roof.

Expanding on the analogy, corporations have proven themselves polluters for profit. The number of corporations that are environmentally aware on their own is indeed rare, and many times are aware due to strict environmental protection laws.

Your "property rights" are a pure smoke screen that illustrates, at the risk of being insulting, a complete and utter ignorance on just how much pollution is spewed when EPA laws are relaxed. No one can live in, or near, Love Canal. No one can recoup the loss of their investment in their homes. No one can live on land once occupied by steel plants and other former industries now gone, leaving large swathes of toxic brown fields not even safe for kids to play in. Factories pump millions of tons of mercury laden poisons into the Hudson. Whose property is spoiled? Factories spew millions of tons of poison into the air. Whose property is impacted even as children cough their lungs out?

The difference in causing a company a 4.8% profit margin as opposed to a 4.9% profit margin to force them to take measures to ensure they are not pumping poisons into the air, the ground, or the water is well worth it.
Click to expand...

It is not always corporate management worrying about profit margin. It sometimes is employees covering their mistakes or department heads trying to stay within budget so they do not get fired. There needs to be EPA laws that prosecute the individuals. The individuals-employees that execute such actions and corporate management if they were derelict in policing their staff or failed to report-correct the problem after it was discovered.
 
Last edited:
kahless said:
It is not always corporate management worrying about profit margin. It sometimes is employees covering their mistakes or department heads trying to stay within budget so they do not get fired. There needs to be EPA laws that prosecute the individuals. The individuals-employees that execute such actions and corporate management if they were derelict in policing their staff or failed to report-correct the problem after it was discovered.
Click to expand...

Lol! Sounds familiar. While working at a chemical company, somebody spilled a bit of a hazardous chemical, which flowed toward (but did not reach) the storm-drain. The guy followed the company procedure, which included notifying the fire department. That employee got into a lot of trouble. "You have to know when to follow the damn procedure!" ;)
 
You know, if it is Aliens, I find it disturbing that they are learning about our species by visiting Arkansas.

Slutter McGee
 
kahless said:
It is not always corporate management worrying about profit margin. It sometimes is employees covering their mistakes or department heads trying to stay within budget so they do not get fired. There needs to be EPA laws that prosecute the individuals. The individuals-employees that execute such actions and corporate management if they were derelict in policing their staff or failed to report-correct the problem after it was discovered.
Click to expand...

Then you run into problems of a "Sacrificial Lamb". Companies would create positions specifically for the purpose of throwing the employee under the bus to that said company could increase it's profits by dumping crap into the environment.

There is simply too much wiggle room for corruption under such a system.
 
MelissaWV said:
Species = flock. A large flock flying at a certain altitude at a given moment would expose the flock to a unique set of weather/atmospheric conditions.

Of course, the kicker NOW is that dead blackbirds seem to be popping up in Louisiana....
Click to expand...

that's normal. one shotgun shell will net several handfuls of black birds for gumbo.
sportsman's paradise, where animals comes to die from something other than old age.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

PAF
When do we "fall back" for daylight saving time 2024 and why does the time change twice a year
Replies
5
Views
2K
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
Swordsmyth
Mississippi Eliminates the Income Tax
Replies
12
Views
130
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
Swordsmyth
DOGE Works: First of Thousands? Crooked Government Official Jailed After Trillions Stolen from the Biden Administration – Here’s What We Know!
Replies
8
Views
80
unknown
unknown
Brian4Liberty
The Fall of Rome Plan
Replies
3
Views
254
Brian4Liberty
Brian4Liberty
Anti Federalist
AR - 3 killed 14 wounded in mass shooting at grocery store in Fordyce, Arkansas
Replies
6
Views
461
navy-vet
navy-vet
Back
Top