Youth Vote Stayed Home

Zippyjuan

Banned
Joined
Feb 5, 2008
Messages
49,008
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/m...young-voters/article/2555784?custom_click=rss

Interim elections are typically more older, whiter voters anyways.
The Democratic Party, however, failed miserably to mobilize millennial voters, a crucial voting bloc that it has come to rely on recently for electoral victory.

Voters aged 18-29 made up only 13 percent of the total votes cast in the 2014 midterm elections, according to CNN exit polling data. Of this 13 percent, 54 percent went to the Democrats, while only 43 percent went to Republican candidates.

The problem with these statistics is that that they are either slightly better than what Democrats got in the 2010 midterms or well below what they got in 2012, when President Obama ran for re-election against former Republican Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney.

In 2010, for instance, voters aged 18-29 accounted for 12 percent of the total vote. Democrats got 55 percent of this vote in the infamous 2010 “red wave” midterm elections.

And the figures for the 2012 presidential election aren’t even close.

In 2012, voters aged 18-29 accounted for 19 percent of the total vote. Of that 19 percent, Democrats captured 60 percent, while Republicans got only 37 percent.

Now, it’s important to note that the electorate in presidential election years tends to be younger. The point here, however, is that the Democratic Party spared no expense in 2014 trying to turn out millennial voters. Indeed, the Democrats focused a great deal of time, money and energy on silly, celebrity-studded “get out the youth vote” gimmicks.

Apparently, this didn’t work out too well for the White House and its allies.
 
After being sold a bucket of lies, I would expect so.
 
I am the 13% :(

That's because you got bit by the Ron Paul common sense approach in Politics. More young people came out to vote for Dr. Paul. Unfortunately, no one out there is talking like him anymore.

The opt-out of SS was one of my favorites.
 
That's because you got bit by the Ron Paul common sense approach in Politics. More young people came out to vote for Dr. Paul. Unfortunately, no one out there is talking like him anymore.

The opt-out of SS was one of my favorites.

Ain't that the truth...
 
Let them all stay home.

Only a tiny minority are not there to cast a ballot to force somebody to do something.
 
Not voting doesn't "send a message". They only care about those who actually cast ballots. Non- voters get their opinion ignored.

Youth have known economic tough times for a large portion of their lives. They have also seen political dysfunction a lot of that time as well. Their cynicism is understandable. Where is the "youthful optimism"?
 
Not voting doesn't "send a message". They only care about those who actually cast ballots. Non- voters get their opinion ignored.

Youth have known economic tough times for a large portion of their lives. They have also seen political dysfunction a lot of that time as well. Their cynicism is understandable. Where is the "youthful optimism"?

LOL - Vote harder!
 
Not voting doesn't "send a message". They only care about those who actually cast ballots. Non- voters get their opinion ignored.

Youth have known economic tough times for a large portion of their lives. They have also seen political dysfunction a lot of that time as well. Their cynicism is understandable. Where is the "youthful optimism"?

If your choice is between republicrat and demopublican what kind of "message" are you sending exactly? I seriously thought about not voting this go round. It was the ballot measures that brought me out. (Anti abortion and anti income tax).
 
That's how Shem won.

Local elections close to home.

Federal elections are hopeless.

We get Shem but we still have all four of those awful broads in DC and another idiot in the governors office.

ETA - Well, shut my mouth.

Frank Guinta won my district's race for Congress.
 
Last edited:
Not voting doesn't "send a message".

Neither does voting.

As demonstrated by "analyses" such as the "Hillary was the real winner of the 2014 midterms" and "the Republicans won because voters want them to work with Obama and the Democrats" stories (both of which I have heard in the media since yesterday), the only "messages" sent to the political class are the ones they want to receive (even if they have to just make them up) ...

Non-voters get their opinion ignored.

Given that nothing of any useful specificity can be reliably deduced about the particular opinions of someone merely because he or she has voted for Candidate X, I am unclear as to what substantial differences there might possibly be between "non-voters getting their opinions ignored" (on the one hand) and "voters not getting their opinions ignored" (on the other hand) ...
 
Not voting doesn't "send a message". They only care about those who actually cast ballots. Non- voters get their opinion ignored.

Youth have known economic tough times for a large portion of their lives. They have also seen political dysfunction a lot of that time as well. Their cynicism is understandable. Where is the "youthful optimism"?

Who ran yesterday that there is to be "optimistic" about? Just be optimistic for no reason? You want to see optimism? Go watch some of Ron Paul's speeches at the college campuses in 2012. There will be "youthful optimism" when someone gives them a reason to be optimistic. Last night's election result in a nutshell -- All we got in 2014 elections was more of the same.
 
Back
Top