If RP and/or the campaign doesn't want to address Social Security, foreign policy, and stop ignoring requests to go on the largest "news" show on tv, there's nothing I can do about that.
Bingo!
For whatever reason, the campaign has gone out of their way to try to get Ron Paul in as few hostile environments as possible. But the irony is, I bet most people in the Ron Paul movement discovered Ron Paul through his participation in some hostile environment (whether it was a biased political debate with Giuliani, a bigoted interview with Hannity, or any of the other innumerable hostile environments Ron Paul and the liberty movement find themselves in).
The lesson is: Ron Paul needs to be part of every discussion at every turn, even if the discussion is there only to attack him. Ron Paul supporters won't leave him, and his detractors may be awoken by RP adversity just as readily as RP propaganda. In other words, Ron Paul needs to cooperate to win, especially if that cooperation is through the competition of ideas. That's what debates are about: cooperating in competition; that's what legal commerce is about: cooperating in competition; that's what art is about: cooperating in competition. We've all but surrendered the field to O'Reilly and Hannity and Huckabee, etc. because we continually refuse to appear where we're most despised. Ghandi, MLK, Rosa Parks, etc. didn't transform nations by avoiding invitations into hostile environments; instead, they welcomed the hostility because they recognized it as yet another opportunity to expose truth.
We may hate O'Reilly (and we're right to hate him) but he still shapes the discussion simply because he talks so much. Even if the neocons hate Ron Paul, Ron Paul can still shape the discussion more just by talking more. That's the nature of how groups operate; he who talks
early has more influence, he who talks
often has more influence. It's true of small groups, it's true of the media, it's true of businesses, it's true of juries, it's true of 5th-grade clicks, it's true everywhere. Doesn't matter who is wrong or right, it's just how people in groups operate. We evolved to be this way, so we better learn to use it to our advantage rather than pretending it's not true.
Remember: John Adams was despised by most of the Continental Congress because he wouldn't shut up about American Independence. The Founders all acknowledged he was "obnoxious and disliked"; but his harping shaped the discussion and allowed the ideas to break through, till eventually they each signed a unanimous resolution agreeing with Adams, making them all traitors to the crown and men marked for execution.
Ron Paul needs to get out there in the media wherever possible as often as possible. He who talks most shapes the discussion.