Not a "phew," it just means that Santorum wasn't surging, but because they said he was, he finally did.Phew!
This scares me cause it basicaly means they are detecting the surge as well. On the other hand if these people can be this effected by one poll..... how are they going to react to speechs during the caucus.
Yes, one way to do our part.If we have a Twitter brigade, I sure hope you guys are on top of it.
Not a "phew," it just means that Santorum wasn't surging, but because they said he was, he finally did.
A picture is worth a thousand words
![]()
The blatant media propaganda this election cycle is so much worse than 2008.
I wish we could drudge tweets...
From ppppolls, their twitter account.
Selzer had Santorum at 9% Tu-W. We had him at `10% M-Tu. Surge quite possibly generated by CNN poll that was quite possibly wrong
If CNN had shown Perry at 15% and he got all the momentum stories, the buzz in Iowa might be all about him this weekend
This means PPP is asserting that CNN had artificial numbers, creating an artificial surge...
I wish we could drudge tweets...
CNN polled only registered Republicans (no independents or Democrats), where Santorum did well. Then, people in Iowa saw that and latched on to Santorum because it looked like he had a chance again. The tail wagged the dog.What does this even mean? haha I am so confused
Very late, 11:30 to midnight EST.what time does PPP's poll come out today??
Not a "phew," it just means that Santorum wasn't surging, but because they said he was, he finally did.