You Won't Believe What Public Policy Polling (PPP) is Saying!

This scares me cause it basicaly means they are detecting the surge as well. On the other hand if these people can be this effected by one poll..... how are they going to react to speechs during the caucus.

If these people are changing their minds this easily how can their votes be counted on?
How can even the fact that they will attend the caucus can be counted on?

That's why I still think the outcome will be
1. Paul
2. Romney
3. Santorum
 
If we have a Twitter brigade, I sure hope you guys are on top of it.
 
Not a "phew," it just means that Santorum wasn't surging, but because they said he was, he finally did.

Agree with this.

However, the entree for CNN to begin pushing him was when the fundamentalists got together and decided to support him. I think they did an ad for him as well. This "tiny" amount of support seems to have given CNN the impetus to push him all week.
 
A picture is worth a thousand words

35m6ne.jpg


The blatant media propaganda this election cycle is so much worse than 2008.

Check out his Facebook page as well: https://www.facebook.com/RickSantorum?sk=wall&filter=2

Only 40K, and not all that many commenting. We can be respectful and educate them on Ron Paul. Many will come over to RP after Santorum drops out, if we can educate them. They don't like Romney.
 
From ppppolls, their twitter account.

Selzer had Santorum at 9% Tu-W. We had him at `10% M-Tu. Surge quite possibly generated by CNN poll that was quite possibly wrong

If CNN had shown Perry at 15% and he got all the momentum stories, the buzz in Iowa might be all about him this weekend

This means PPP is asserting that CNN had artificial numbers, creating an artificial surge...

What does this even mean? haha I am so confused
 
Anyone shocked by these type of tricks by the corporate media propaganda machine simply doesn't realize it is it's precise nature to do them. :rolleyes:
 
We should eail the other campaigns, bachmann, perry, etc andget them to make a stink about this. Maybe they could split the vote enough to ruin his surge.
 
What does this even mean? haha I am so confused
CNN polled only registered Republicans (no independents or Democrats), where Santorum did well. Then, people in Iowa saw that and latched on to Santorum because it looked like he had a chance again. The tail wagged the dog.
 
Not a "phew," it just means that Santorum wasn't surging, but because they said he was, he finally did.

Exactly! The media knows slanted polls are often a self fulfilling prophecy and they use that to their advantage. People want to put their money on the perceived winning horse. (as if this is some kind of horse race)
 
Back
Top