You DO NOT have the right to burn the Koran.

[hillbilly123069]

I have to post a new path for this conversation. After listening to Hannity yesterday(9/14) on the radio with his 2 guests, the korn needs to be examined a little closer. A commandment to lie until #'s are sufficient to start a war against ALL non believers????
1 woman on the show was headline on al kida's top site 3 times in the last 6 months.
Both were in hiding and agreed that it's only a matter of time b4 they're dead, and that the korn had to be exposed.
Yes I said korn because Jesus is the only begotten son of God Himself. I have NO respect for the deception that is islam.

 

[Kludge]

I understand that government can take away our property or treasures without a reason.... the funny part is where do they get the moral power to RULE over me? take away my property... i refuse to participate in this idiotic corrupt system voting is a sham whoever gets into office government always slips in.

In that case, you own any Koran you can keep and you can do whatever you want with it until you're no longer able to resist the occupying government -- But... it'll probably be a short life.

 

[erowe1]

so you've already burned one? lol

No. I meant it makes me want to do it more, meaning more than I already want to do it. I've been itching to lately.

 

[BlackTerrel]

I have to post a new path for this conversation. After listening to Hannity yesterday(9/14) on the radio with his 2 guests, the korn needs to be examined a little closer. A commandment to lie until #'s are sufficient to start a war against ALL non believers????
1 woman on the show was headline on al kida's top site 3 times in the last 6 months.
Both were in hiding and agreed that it's only a matter of time b4 they're dead, and that the korn had to be exposed.
Yes I said korn because Jesus is the only begotten son of God Himself. I have NO respect for the deception that is islam.

Was the username hillbilly123068 taken?

 

[PreDeadMan]

In that case, you own any Koran you can keep and you can do whatever you want with it until you're no longer able to resist the occupying government -- But... it'll probably be a short life.

Of course I can't go up against the government a gigantic coercive violent monopoly. If it wants something and it doesn't get it FORCE will be used. If you don't comply to its wishes even though it's CLEARLY immoral... FORCE will be used.

 

[Trigonx]

I never thought of burning any book in general in my life. But now, after hearing "i do not have the right" to burn some book, I kind of want to.

 

[Pericles]

I never thought of burning any book in general in my life. But now, after hearing "i do not have the right" to burn some book, I kind of want to.

Sam Adams would be proud of you.

 

[hillbilly123069]

Was the username hillbilly123068 taken?

My username is the same everywhere you go. I'm easy to find if you look. Are you ashamed of what you feel or believe?

 

[JustinTime]

Breyer didn’t really say that at all. He only said the SC would probably come to a decision based on that concept over a series of cases (paraphrased).

Would probably come to that decision? Well golly, thanks for making me feel so much better.

 

[JustinTime]

I think the OP was well meaning but it would have been better received if it was posted as a positive suggestion. One can do it, but should one? Of course context is always important.

When government gets involved, the "should you?" question is out the window. I dont even think you should, but regardless the government has no business telling you that.

Its not the Koran, Muslims, or any of that attention grabbing stuff so popular in the media that irks me about this. Its the idea that our right to expression should be restricted by government because it may offend violent people.

I know it sounds like a strech, but I can see a day when government makes all sorts of speech illegal by using agent provocateurs to cause violence.

 

[ARealConservative]

You remind me of what Freud said in his essay on group psychology. He cited Gustave LeBon (noted for his works promoting racial superiority and how individuals become "dumb" when in crowds-the latter of which he makes valid observations about) in asserting that the individual's nature is "drowned" in the context of society. It's indeed sad that you accept such archaic European notions that diminish the individual in favor of "society".

you remind me of every high school/college libertarian I have ever met.

sophomoric thinking works great when life is so simple.

 

[ARealConservative]

But you don't have a right not to be offended.

in context, your response makes no sense.

never did I say a thing about being offended.

it seems like you don't have a clue what I am saying but felt the need to reply anyway

 

[hillbilly123069]

When government gets involved, the "should you?" question is out the window. I dont even think you should, but regardless the government has no business telling you that.

Its not the Koran, Muslims, or any of that attention grabbing stuff so popular in the media that irks me about this. Its the idea that our right to expression should be restricted by government because it may offend violent people.

I know it sounds like a strech, but I can see a day when government makes all sorts of speech illegal by using agent provocateurs to cause violence.

How has anyone overlooked the fact that the more the fed govt gets involved with everyday events, the worse our situation gets?

 

[Feenix566]

If the federal government wants to get into the business of stopping people from doing things that might provoke muslim hatred of the United States, they could start by banning drone attacks in Pakistan.

 

[Travlyr]

You DO NOT have the right to burn the Koran.

If I buy a Koran in an auction with a bunch of other stuff, I have the right to throw it out along with other stuff I did not want. That is my right.
What is wrong is for me to call Hannity and tell him about it so he can make a big deal of it to perpetuate hatred and war.

 

[idirtify]

Would probably come to that decision? Well golly, thanks for making me feel so much better.

Sorry for the not-perfectly-explicit wording. Breyer did not seem to be saying which way the decision would or should probably come out; but only that the question of legality based on the concept of “yelling fire in theatre” would probably come up in future cases. That says nothing about which way he thinks it would or should go. It’s really just a fancy way of saying “yes, it’s a question”.

 

[Vessol]

you remind me of every high school/college libertarian I have ever met.

sophomoric thinking works great when life is so simple.

I share heavenlyboy's thoughts and opinions on this matter.

I do not live simply. I've grown up fairly rough, I was homeless for a couple months when I was 16. Currently I am struggling with just affording a meal a day. I personally enjoy the challenge and living fully independently on my own. I'm attending college full time while fully supporting myself working 30 hours over the weekends.

I find the fact that you think that those whom believe in individualism are just "sophomoric thinkers living the simple live" VERY insulting.

These beliefs while more developed as I've gotten older and studied, have always been at the core of my morality system. That what you earn by your own sweat is yours and that you are your own ruler.

Plus you again make just another Ad hominem attack. You attack the person instead of attacking their argument or idea, which is actually against the rules on this forum if you didn't know.

 

[Warrior_of_Freedom]

I'm getting sick of all this crap. It just makes me want to make a bonfire out of every religious text in existence.

 

[JustinTime]

Sorry for the not-perfectly-explicit wording. Breyer did not seem to be saying which way the decision would or should probably come out; but only that the question of legality based on the concept of “yelling fire in theatre” would probably come up in future cases. That says nothing about which way he thinks it would or should go. It’s really just a fancy way of saying “yes, it’s a question”.

It shouldnt be a question at all. Its ridiculous to even consider it.

 

[JustinTime]

I share heavenlyboy's thoughts and opinions on this matter.

I do not live simply. I've grown up fairly rough, I was homeless for a couple months when I was 16. Currently I am struggling with just affording a meal a day. I personally enjoy the challenge and living fully independently on my own. I'm attending college full time while fully supporting myself working 30 hours over the weekends.

I find the fact that you think that those whom believe in individualism are just "sophomoric thinkers living the simple live" VERY insulting.

These beliefs while more developed as I've gotten older and studied, have always been at the core of my morality system. That what you earn by your own sweat is yours and that you are your own ruler.

Plus you again make just another Ad hominem attack. You attack the person instead of attacking their argument or idea, which is actually against the rules on this forum if you didn't know.

That, and the fact that he can't find his caps key, makes him calling you a sophomoric thinker LOLworthy.