Here is the reply from "Norm-nuts" ...
Dear Mr. Burgess:
Thank you for taking the time to contact me regarding the proposal for immunity for telecommunication companies included in the modernization of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). I respectfully disagree with your view on this matter.
I believe that it is unfair to penalize companies for responding to written assurances from the highest levels of the government that their help is legal and essential for saving lives. The immunity provision will only apply to companies if they have official documents from the government demonstrating the activities were deemed legal and authorized by the President. I would also point out that the Senate Intelligence Committee looked into this matter and found that the telecom companies acted in "good faith" based on the information they had.
Whether the government acted properly is a different question from whether a private person has acted properly in responding to the government's call for help. I have supported efforts to investigate the legality of the wireless surveillance program, and believe that if any wrongdoing is found, measures should be taken accordingly.
As you may know, the FISA Amendments Act of 2007 (S. 2248) was introduced by Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) on October 26, 2007. This bill seeks to amend the FISA Act of 1978 in order to modernize and streamline its provisions, which is necessary for our country to enhance our nation's capability to prevent future terrorist attacks. S. 2248 also includes a retroactive liability protection for telecommunication companies that assisted our government in a warrantless surveillance program in the aftermath of the September 11th terrorist attacks on the U.S. The bill was approved by the Intelligence Committee on a bipartisan basis and currently awaits consideration by the full Senate.
I support national intelligence activities undertaken by the federal government which are lawful and necessary for the pursuit of terrorists. I recognize that we need to strike a balance between preventing another terrorist attack and defending civil liberties. For this reason I am a strong proponent of Congressional oversight of surveillance activities.
I will continue to follow this important issue. While we may agree on some issues and disagree on others, I appreciate hearing from you and hope you will not hesitate to contact me on any issue of concern to you.
Sincerely,
Norm Coleman
United States Senate
Dear Mr. Ludlum,
Thank you for contacting me to express your opposition to the modernization of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and the National Security Agency's surveillance activities. I appreciate hearing from you on this issue.
As you may know, the Senate recently passed S.2248, the FISA Amendments Act of 2007, which updates FISA activities to allow monitoring of certain international communications. This legislation requires that the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence approve surveillance activities and the FISA Court have oversight of the procedures used.
We are actively engaged in a War on Terror, fighting against enemies who have made clear their intention to destroy America. The United States has people dedicated to eliminating terrorism and protecting American lives. We must equip them with the tools necessary to learn of our enemies' plans and quickly and effectively respond to threats.
Like you, I also understand the importance of protecting our constitutional freedoms. A balance must be achieved between safeguarding individual liberties and providing America's defenders with the tools to be successful. Congress will remain vigilant in oversight of these surveillance activities. Please rest assured that I will keep your concerns in mind as the Senate considers this legislation.
Thank you again for sharing your views with me. Please feel free to contact me in the future about anything important to you or your family. It is an honor to serve you and the people of the State of South Carolina.
Sincerely,
Jim DeMint
United States Senator
Code:[/B] How the Senate voted . . . Sen. Joseph Biden [D, DE] Nay Sen. Hillary Clinton [D, NY] Abstain Sen. Christopher Dodd [D, CT] Nay Sen. John Kerry [D, MA] Nay Sen. John McCain [R, AZ] Aye Sen. Barack Obama [D, IL] Abstain
McLame stands above everyone wanting to be POTUS, doesn't he.
[R, SC] Sen. Lindsey Graham Abstain
[R, WY] Sen. John Barrasso Aye
[R, WY] Sen. Michael Enzi Aye
[R, VA] Sen. John Warner Aye
[R, UT] Sen. Robert Bennett Aye
[R, UT] Sen. Orrin Hatch Aye
[R, TX] Sen. John Cornyn Aye
[R, TX] Sen. Kay Hutchison Aye
[R, TN] Sen. Lamar Alexander Aye
[R, TN] Sen. Bob Corker Aye
[R, SD] Sen. John Thune Aye
[R, SC] Sen. Jim DeMint Aye
[R, PA] Sen. Arlen Specter Aye
[R, OR] Sen. Gordon Smith Aye
[R, OK] Sen. Thomas Coburn Aye
[R, OK] Sen. James Inhofe Aye
[R, OH] Sen. George Voinovich Aye
[R, NV] Sen. John Ensign Aye
[R, NM] Sen. Pete Domenici Aye
[R, NH] Sen. Judd Gregg Aye
[R, NH] Sen. John Sununu Aye
[R, NE] Sen. Charles Hagel Aye
[R, NC] Sen. Richard Burr Aye
[R, NC] Sen. Elizabeth Dole Aye
[R, MS-1] Rep. Roger Wicker Aye
[R, MS] Sen. Thad Cochran Aye
[R, MO] Sen. Christopher Bond Aye
[R, MN] Sen. Norm Coleman Aye
[R, ME] Sen. Susan Collins Aye
[R, ME] Sen. Olympia Snowe Aye
[R, LA] Sen. David Vitter Aye
[R, KY] Sen. Jim Bunning Aye
[R, KY] Sen. Mitch McConnell Aye
[R, KS] Sen. Samuel Brownback Aye
[R, KS] Sen. Pat Roberts Aye
[R, IN] Sen. Richard Lugar Aye
[R, ID] Sen. Larry Craig Aye
[R, ID] Sen. Michael Crapo Aye
[R, IA] Sen. Charles Grassley Aye
[R, GA] Sen. C. Saxby Chambliss Aye
[R, GA] Sen. John Isakson Aye
[R, FL] Sen. Mel Martinez Aye
[R, CO] Sen. Wayne Allard Aye
[R, AZ] Sen. Jon Kyl Aye
[R, AZ] Sen. John McCain Aye
[R, AL] Sen. Jefferson Sessions Aye
[R, AL] Sen. Richard Shelby Aye
[R, AK] Sen. Lisa Murkowski Aye
[R, AK] Sen. Ted Stevens Aye
[D, NY] Sen. Hillary Clinton Abstain
[D, IL] Sen. Barack Obama Abstain
[D, WV] Sen. John Rockefeller Aye
[D, WI] Sen. Herbert Kohl Aye
[D, VA] Sen. Jim Webb Aye
[D, SD] Sen. Tim Johnson Aye
[D, RI] Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse Aye
[D, PA] Sen. Robert Casey Aye
[D, NE] Sen. Ben Nelson Aye
[D, ND] Sen. Kent Conrad Aye
[D, MT] Sen. Max Baucus Aye
[D, MO] Sen. Claire McCaskill Aye
[D, MD] Sen. Barbara Mikulski Aye
[D, LA] Sen. Mary Landrieu Aye
[D, IN] Sen. B. Evan Bayh Aye
[D, HI] Sen. Daniel Inouye Aye
[D, FL] Sen. Bill Nelson Aye
[D, DE] Sen. Thomas Carper Aye
[D, CO] Sen. Ken Salazar Aye
[D, AR] Sen. Blanche Lincoln Aye
[D, AR] Sen. Mark Pryor Aye
[D, WV] Sen. Robert Byrd Nay
[D, WI] Sen. Russell Feingold Nay
[D, WA] Sen. Maria Cantwell Nay
[D, WA] Sen. Patty Murray Nay
[D, VT] Sen. Patrick Leahy Nay
[D, RI] Sen. John Reed Nay
[D, OR] Sen. Ron Wyden Nay
[D, OH] Sen. Sherrod Brown Nay
[D, NY] Sen. Charles Schumer Nay
[D, NV] Sen. Harry Reid Nay
[D, NM] Sen. Jeff Bingaman Nay
[D, NJ] Sen. Frank Lautenberg Nay
[D, NJ] Sen. Robert Menendez Nay
[D, ND] Sen. Byron Dorgan Nay
[D, MT] Sen. Jon Tester Nay
[D, MN] Sen. Amy Klobuchar Nay
[D, MI] Sen. Carl Levin Nay
[D, MI] Sen. Debbie Ann Stabenow Nay
[D, MD] Sen. Benjamin Cardin Nay
[D, MA] Sen. Edward Kennedy Nay
[D, MA] Sen. John Kerry Nay
[D, IL] Sen. Richard Durbin Nay
[D, IA] Sen. Thomas Harkin Nay
[D, HI] Sen. Daniel Akaka Nay
[D, DE] Sen. Joseph Biden Nay
[D, CT] Sen. Christopher Dodd Nay
[D, CA] Sen. Barbara Boxer Nay
[D, CA] Sen. Dianne Feinstein Nay
[I, CT] Sen. Joseph Lieberman Aye
[I, VT] Sen. Bernard Sanders Nay
I have said it before and I'll say it again:
Cowards
Sen. Barack Obama [D, IL] Abstain
Sen. Hillary Clinton [D, NY] Abstain
I think that is a Nay. But a cowardly nay. You can't win the Presidency if you "Are weak with National Security"
This was a McCain Nay.
what does abstain mean? They didn't show up to vote?