YES!! Mediaite covers the edited Paul/Berger interview

[pulp8721]

The full-cut video of CNN’s contentious interview with Ron Paul has been uploaded to the web.According to a popular post on the social link-sharing website Reddit and Daily Paul, a site for Ron Paul supporters, CNN’s original aired interview was “edited” and “misleading”.The full-unedited cut still shows Paul leaving the interview while Gloria Borger is peppering him with questions about his controversial newsletters. But some say that the original cut makes Paul look bad and was unfairly edited.“By watching the full one, it looks like he refused to answer the question and then walked off,” said user SCope13.“The edited video was very convincing. I believed he cut and ran. Now that I’ve seen the uncut one though… It gives you an entirely different impression than the one I originally saw,” said user globalvar.What do you think?​

hxxp://www.mediaite.com/online/did-cnn-unfairly-edit-the-ron-paul-walk-off-interview-watch-the-uncut-interview/

 

[deadfish]

Drudge this?

 

[satchelmcqueen]

the interview really wasnt bad imo. the edited version was though. they made it look like ron ran from the question. but in the full version he actually answered the question perfectly.

even before she asked the question gloria even stated that she knows hes stated he didnt write them and disavowed them in the past.

its obvious that cnn had to use editing to make ron look bad on an issue that the interviewer admitted up front, that he didnt do.

 

[satchelmcqueen]

i say yes. i shared it on facebook just like i do all ron interviews. i didnt even explain what was in it. just the vid link. if people watch it i think they will see it as a positive. i seriously think ron did well. it was the editing. the vid does show that cnn set him up a few days ago.

Drudge this?

 

[satchelmcqueen]

and ron talks about what would happen if iran was a threat to us. that answer alone is worth it to those who doubt him as being weak with the millitary.

 

[milo10]

Drudged here.

 

[undergroundrr]

Best Iran statement ever. The interviewer's confused responses are priceless. You can virtually see her brain rotating in her skull as he answers.

 

[WannabeaJuke]

Best Iran statement ever. The interviewer's confused responses are priceless. You can virtually see her brain rotating in her skull as he answers.

LOL...very funny.

 

[specsaregood]

Best Iran statement ever. The interviewer's confused responses are priceless. You can virtually see her brain rotating in her skull as he answers.

What did he say? I can't watchit right now.

 

[Adrock]

Should I even bother trying to send it to Hot Air?

 

[Bergie Bergeron]

Should I even bother trying to send it to Hot Air?

Meh, doesn't hurt to try.

 

[undergroundrr]

Should I even bother trying to send it to Hot Air?

Sure, but present it as more evidence of Ron Paul's Iranophilia. That's the only way you'll get any of them to watch it.

 

[undergroundrr]

What did he say? I can't watchit right now.

Basically, she asked if there was ever a situation when we'd attack Iran. Ron says "sure." Gloria keeps pushing and he says we would if they attacked us. She asks "us directly?" and he gives her an absolutely priceless "well duh" look. He explains congress getting it declared, winning the objective and get out. He lists off all the countries we've invaded without having been attacked, then -

"Gloria: We were attacked on 9/11

Ron: By who?

Gloria: Terrorists.

Ron: Who were from?

Gloria: An assortment of countries.

Ron: So we attack all of the countries in the world? That's ridiculous!"

You have to see it though. It was not aired because her credibility is absolutely decimated by this exchange.

 

[affa]

looks like some comment help is needed -- some guy is linking out to anti-Ron Paul lie sites.